{"title":"Janus的伪造——Janus资本集团诉第一衍生品交易商案的简要案例评论","authors":"Edward G. Pekarek, Genavieve Shingle","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1942748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rule 10b-5 prohibits 'making any untrue statement of a material fact' in connection with the purchase or sale of securities. The critical question considered by the Janus Court was how the term 'make' in Rule 10b-5 should be construed. The SEC contended that 'make' is synonymous with 'create,' which would allow it (and private plaintiffs) to assert a claim against one who provides false or misleading material information to another, who later includes it in a statement. However, the Court rejected this definition and found the phrase at issue in Rule 10b-5, 'to make . . . any statement,' to be the approximate equivalent of 'to state.'","PeriodicalId":289542,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Securities Litigation (Sub-Topic)","volume":"552 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Make Believe of Janus - A Brief Case Comment Examining Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders\",\"authors\":\"Edward G. Pekarek, Genavieve Shingle\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1942748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rule 10b-5 prohibits 'making any untrue statement of a material fact' in connection with the purchase or sale of securities. The critical question considered by the Janus Court was how the term 'make' in Rule 10b-5 should be construed. The SEC contended that 'make' is synonymous with 'create,' which would allow it (and private plaintiffs) to assert a claim against one who provides false or misleading material information to another, who later includes it in a statement. However, the Court rejected this definition and found the phrase at issue in Rule 10b-5, 'to make . . . any statement,' to be the approximate equivalent of 'to state.'\",\"PeriodicalId\":289542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CGN: Securities Litigation (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"552 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CGN: Securities Litigation (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1942748\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Securities Litigation (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1942748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Make Believe of Janus - A Brief Case Comment Examining Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders
Rule 10b-5 prohibits 'making any untrue statement of a material fact' in connection with the purchase or sale of securities. The critical question considered by the Janus Court was how the term 'make' in Rule 10b-5 should be construed. The SEC contended that 'make' is synonymous with 'create,' which would allow it (and private plaintiffs) to assert a claim against one who provides false or misleading material information to another, who later includes it in a statement. However, the Court rejected this definition and found the phrase at issue in Rule 10b-5, 'to make . . . any statement,' to be the approximate equivalent of 'to state.'