欧拉图和树形图的设计和评价,用于社会网络可视化

Mithileysh Sathiyanarayanan, N. Burlutskiy
{"title":"欧拉图和树形图的设计和评价,用于社会网络可视化","authors":"Mithileysh Sathiyanarayanan, N. Burlutskiy","doi":"10.1109/COMSNETS.2015.7098715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At present, the complexity and scale of modern social networks is at its highest level but there is a gap in how to represent these networks and their relationships to a user. As a result, it is often hard for a user to understand the relationships in the social networks and make an informed decision over it. Network diagrams has become a standard for social networks visualisation and analysis. However, in this paper, two alternative visualisation types for social network representation and analysis were considered. An Euler diagram and treemap were evaluated for visualising social networks and conveying information on people in a network, their relationships and common interests. Then two new visualisations for social network representation based on these two types of visualisation were proposed. An Euler diagram augmented by a network diagram and a treemap combined with a network diagram were designed and then compared in an evaluation. The visualisations were evaluated by twenty participants for appropriateness and usefulness of the two visualisations in comparison to each other. Finally, the results of the evaluation, limitations and usefulness of the proposed diagrams were discussed.","PeriodicalId":277593,"journal":{"name":"2015 7th International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design and evaluation of euler diagram and treemap for social network visualisation\",\"authors\":\"Mithileysh Sathiyanarayanan, N. Burlutskiy\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COMSNETS.2015.7098715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At present, the complexity and scale of modern social networks is at its highest level but there is a gap in how to represent these networks and their relationships to a user. As a result, it is often hard for a user to understand the relationships in the social networks and make an informed decision over it. Network diagrams has become a standard for social networks visualisation and analysis. However, in this paper, two alternative visualisation types for social network representation and analysis were considered. An Euler diagram and treemap were evaluated for visualising social networks and conveying information on people in a network, their relationships and common interests. Then two new visualisations for social network representation based on these two types of visualisation were proposed. An Euler diagram augmented by a network diagram and a treemap combined with a network diagram were designed and then compared in an evaluation. The visualisations were evaluated by twenty participants for appropriateness and usefulness of the two visualisations in comparison to each other. Finally, the results of the evaluation, limitations and usefulness of the proposed diagrams were discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":277593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 7th International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 7th International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMSNETS.2015.7098715\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 7th International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMSNETS.2015.7098715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

目前,现代社交网络的复杂性和规模都达到了最高水平,但在如何表示这些网络及其与用户的关系方面还存在差距。因此,用户通常很难理解社交网络中的关系,并据此做出明智的决定。网络图已经成为社会网络可视化和分析的标准。然而,在本文中,两种可供选择的可视化类型的社会网络表示和分析被考虑。欧拉图和树状图在可视化社会网络和传达网络中人们的信息、他们的关系和共同利益方面进行了评估。然后在这两种可视化的基础上提出了两种新的社会网络表示可视化。设计了网络图扩充的欧拉图和网络图结合的树状图,并在评价中进行了比较。可视化是由20名参与者评估的适当性和有用的两个可视化相互比较。最后,讨论了评价结果、所提出的图的局限性和有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design and evaluation of euler diagram and treemap for social network visualisation
At present, the complexity and scale of modern social networks is at its highest level but there is a gap in how to represent these networks and their relationships to a user. As a result, it is often hard for a user to understand the relationships in the social networks and make an informed decision over it. Network diagrams has become a standard for social networks visualisation and analysis. However, in this paper, two alternative visualisation types for social network representation and analysis were considered. An Euler diagram and treemap were evaluated for visualising social networks and conveying information on people in a network, their relationships and common interests. Then two new visualisations for social network representation based on these two types of visualisation were proposed. An Euler diagram augmented by a network diagram and a treemap combined with a network diagram were designed and then compared in an evaluation. The visualisations were evaluated by twenty participants for appropriateness and usefulness of the two visualisations in comparison to each other. Finally, the results of the evaluation, limitations and usefulness of the proposed diagrams were discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信