检测社交媒体新闻评论中的无意信息泄露

I. Yahav, D. Schwartz, Gahl Silverman
{"title":"检测社交媒体新闻评论中的无意信息泄露","authors":"I. Yahav, D. Schwartz, Gahl Silverman","doi":"10.1109/IRI.2014.7051874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is concerned with unintentional information leakage (UIL) through social networks, and in particular, Facebook Organizations often use forms of self censorship in order to maintain security. Non-identification of individuals, products, or places is seen as a sufficient means of information protection. A prime example is the replacement of a name with a supposedly non-identifying initial. This has traditionally been effective in obfuscating the identity of military personnel, protected witnesses, minors, victims or suspects who need to be granted a level of protection through anonymity. We challenge the effectiveness of this form of censorship in light of current uses and ongoing developments in Social Networks showing that name-obfits cation mandated by court or military order can be systematically compromised through the unintentional actions of public social network commenters. We propose a qualitative method for recognition and characterization of UIL followed by a quantitative study that automatically detects UIL comments.","PeriodicalId":360013,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 15th International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IEEE IRI 2014)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detecting unintentional information leakage in social media news comments\",\"authors\":\"I. Yahav, D. Schwartz, Gahl Silverman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IRI.2014.7051874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is concerned with unintentional information leakage (UIL) through social networks, and in particular, Facebook Organizations often use forms of self censorship in order to maintain security. Non-identification of individuals, products, or places is seen as a sufficient means of information protection. A prime example is the replacement of a name with a supposedly non-identifying initial. This has traditionally been effective in obfuscating the identity of military personnel, protected witnesses, minors, victims or suspects who need to be granted a level of protection through anonymity. We challenge the effectiveness of this form of censorship in light of current uses and ongoing developments in Social Networks showing that name-obfits cation mandated by court or military order can be systematically compromised through the unintentional actions of public social network commenters. We propose a qualitative method for recognition and characterization of UIL followed by a quantitative study that automatically detects UIL comments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 15th International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IEEE IRI 2014)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 15th International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IEEE IRI 2014)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IRI.2014.7051874\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 15th International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IEEE IRI 2014)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IRI.2014.7051874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本文关注的是通过社交网络的无意信息泄露(UIL),特别是Facebook组织经常使用自我审查的形式来维护安全。不识别个人、产品或场所被视为一种充分的信息保护手段。一个典型的例子是用一个可能无法识别的首字母替换名字。传统上,这在混淆军事人员、受保护证人、未成年人、受害者或嫌疑人的身份方面是有效的,这些人需要通过匿名获得一定程度的保护。鉴于社交网络的当前使用和持续发展,我们对这种审查形式的有效性提出了质疑,这表明法院或军事命令强制执行的姓名目标可能会通过公共社交网络评论者的无意行为系统性地受到损害。我们提出了一种定性的方法来识别和表征UIL,然后进行定量研究,自动检测UIL评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detecting unintentional information leakage in social media news comments
This paper is concerned with unintentional information leakage (UIL) through social networks, and in particular, Facebook Organizations often use forms of self censorship in order to maintain security. Non-identification of individuals, products, or places is seen as a sufficient means of information protection. A prime example is the replacement of a name with a supposedly non-identifying initial. This has traditionally been effective in obfuscating the identity of military personnel, protected witnesses, minors, victims or suspects who need to be granted a level of protection through anonymity. We challenge the effectiveness of this form of censorship in light of current uses and ongoing developments in Social Networks showing that name-obfits cation mandated by court or military order can be systematically compromised through the unintentional actions of public social network commenters. We propose a qualitative method for recognition and characterization of UIL followed by a quantitative study that automatically detects UIL comments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信