{"title":"内在伦理与表现形式","authors":"Elizabeth N. Vasileva","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439077.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the many recurring themes in Deleuzeʼs writings is the problem of representation. This can be traced as early as Difference and Repetition, but his critique of representation also played a major role in his collaborations with Guattari and continue in later writings such as What is Philosophy? This chapter aims at extending and applying this critique to ethics and, more specifically, to (post)anarchist ethics.","PeriodicalId":107197,"journal":{"name":"Deleuze and Anarchism","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immanent Ethics and Forms of Representation\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth N. Vasileva\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439077.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Among the many recurring themes in Deleuzeʼs writings is the problem of representation. This can be traced as early as Difference and Repetition, but his critique of representation also played a major role in his collaborations with Guattari and continue in later writings such as What is Philosophy? This chapter aims at extending and applying this critique to ethics and, more specifically, to (post)anarchist ethics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Deleuze and Anarchism\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Deleuze and Anarchism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439077.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deleuze and Anarchism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439077.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Among the many recurring themes in Deleuzeʼs writings is the problem of representation. This can be traced as early as Difference and Repetition, but his critique of representation also played a major role in his collaborations with Guattari and continue in later writings such as What is Philosophy? This chapter aims at extending and applying this critique to ethics and, more specifically, to (post)anarchist ethics.