内在伦理与表现形式

Elizabeth N. Vasileva
{"title":"内在伦理与表现形式","authors":"Elizabeth N. Vasileva","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439077.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the many recurring themes in Deleuzeʼs writings is the problem of representation. This can be traced as early as Difference and Repetition, but his critique of representation also played a major role in his collaborations with Guattari and continue in later writings such as What is Philosophy? This chapter aims at extending and applying this critique to ethics and, more specifically, to (post)anarchist ethics.","PeriodicalId":107197,"journal":{"name":"Deleuze and Anarchism","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immanent Ethics and Forms of Representation\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth N. Vasileva\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439077.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Among the many recurring themes in Deleuzeʼs writings is the problem of representation. This can be traced as early as Difference and Repetition, but his critique of representation also played a major role in his collaborations with Guattari and continue in later writings such as What is Philosophy? This chapter aims at extending and applying this critique to ethics and, more specifically, to (post)anarchist ethics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Deleuze and Anarchism\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Deleuze and Anarchism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439077.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deleuze and Anarchism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439077.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

德勒兹作品中反复出现的主题之一是再现问题。这可以追溯到早在《差异与重复》中,但他对再现的批判也在他与瓜塔里的合作中发挥了重要作用,并在后来的作品中继续发挥作用,如《什么是哲学?》本章旨在将这种批判扩展并应用于伦理学,更具体地说,应用于(后)无政府主义伦理学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immanent Ethics and Forms of Representation
Among the many recurring themes in Deleuzeʼs writings is the problem of representation. This can be traced as early as Difference and Repetition, but his critique of representation also played a major role in his collaborations with Guattari and continue in later writings such as What is Philosophy? This chapter aims at extending and applying this critique to ethics and, more specifically, to (post)anarchist ethics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信