用保险为国家不可分割费用融资

Markus Fels
{"title":"用保险为国家不可分割费用融资","authors":"Markus Fels","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3587649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Standard economic theory interprets insurance as a means for risk-averse individuals to transfer risk. I argue that another important function of insurance is to optimally finance indivisible expenses that only have value in particular states of nature. Contrary to traditional predictions, insurance is then a normal good, the additional consumption of the covered goods and services by the insured is not a sign of inefficiency, and the marginal-utility gap between states is not informative about the value of insurance. Acknowledging this additional purpose of insurance requires a novel understanding of risk attitudes in general, and a reconsideration and possibly reevaluation of previous policy advice.","PeriodicalId":423793,"journal":{"name":"SIRN: Health Insurance (Topic)","volume":"12 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financing State-Dependent Indivisible Expenses With Insurance\",\"authors\":\"Markus Fels\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3587649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Standard economic theory interprets insurance as a means for risk-averse individuals to transfer risk. I argue that another important function of insurance is to optimally finance indivisible expenses that only have value in particular states of nature. Contrary to traditional predictions, insurance is then a normal good, the additional consumption of the covered goods and services by the insured is not a sign of inefficiency, and the marginal-utility gap between states is not informative about the value of insurance. Acknowledging this additional purpose of insurance requires a novel understanding of risk attitudes in general, and a reconsideration and possibly reevaluation of previous policy advice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":423793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SIRN: Health Insurance (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"12 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SIRN: Health Insurance (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3587649\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIRN: Health Insurance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3587649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

标准经济理论将保险解释为风险厌恶者转移风险的一种手段。我认为保险的另一个重要功能是为不可分割的费用提供最佳融资,这些费用只有在特定的自然状态下才有价值。与传统预测相反,保险是一种正常商品,被保险人对保险商品和服务的额外消费并不是效率低下的标志,各州之间的边际效用差距并不能提供有关保险价值的信息。要认识到保险的这一附加目的,需要对一般的风险态度有新的理解,需要对以前的政策建议进行重新考虑和可能的重新评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Financing State-Dependent Indivisible Expenses With Insurance
Standard economic theory interprets insurance as a means for risk-averse individuals to transfer risk. I argue that another important function of insurance is to optimally finance indivisible expenses that only have value in particular states of nature. Contrary to traditional predictions, insurance is then a normal good, the additional consumption of the covered goods and services by the insured is not a sign of inefficiency, and the marginal-utility gap between states is not informative about the value of insurance. Acknowledging this additional purpose of insurance requires a novel understanding of risk attitudes in general, and a reconsideration and possibly reevaluation of previous policy advice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信