信任与伙伴关系在建设项目成功中的作用的文献综述

Shahnawaz Khan, S. Gul, Attaullah Shah
{"title":"信任与伙伴关系在建设项目成功中的作用的文献综述","authors":"Shahnawaz Khan, S. Gul, Attaullah Shah","doi":"10.5897/AJBMX11.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contracting plays a dominant role mostly in large scale and complex projects. Its use in construction projects takes the role of risk transference and governance. Despite the developments taking place in the discipline of project management in general and contracting in specific, projects are still failing. Literature attributes various reasons to these failures; however, a significant body of literature on project seems to attribute failure to poor contracting practice. Contractual failures give rise to situations of litigation and long-running disputes that recursively cause various problems within projects. The effect of poor contracting has often been observed in the various components of the project management triangle (that is, scope, quality, cost, and time). Contracts are pervasive and contractual agreements exist between the project principal and contractors as well as between contractors and sub-contractors; the review of literature presented in this work, however, is focused on the former. This paper presents a discussion from the perspective of the literature pertaining to the softer issues in contracts and provides discussion on how trust and partnering act within the contracts of construction projects.","PeriodicalId":360067,"journal":{"name":"ERN: The Partnership Form (Topic)","volume":"405 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Review of Literature on the Role of Trust and Partnering in Success of Construction Projects\",\"authors\":\"Shahnawaz Khan, S. Gul, Attaullah Shah\",\"doi\":\"10.5897/AJBMX11.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Contracting plays a dominant role mostly in large scale and complex projects. Its use in construction projects takes the role of risk transference and governance. Despite the developments taking place in the discipline of project management in general and contracting in specific, projects are still failing. Literature attributes various reasons to these failures; however, a significant body of literature on project seems to attribute failure to poor contracting practice. Contractual failures give rise to situations of litigation and long-running disputes that recursively cause various problems within projects. The effect of poor contracting has often been observed in the various components of the project management triangle (that is, scope, quality, cost, and time). Contracts are pervasive and contractual agreements exist between the project principal and contractors as well as between contractors and sub-contractors; the review of literature presented in this work, however, is focused on the former. This paper presents a discussion from the perspective of the literature pertaining to the softer issues in contracts and provides discussion on how trust and partnering act within the contracts of construction projects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: The Partnership Form (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"405 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: The Partnership Form (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBMX11.024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: The Partnership Form (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBMX11.024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

承包在大型、复杂的工程项目中起主导作用。它在建设项目中的应用起到了风险转移和治理的作用。尽管总体项目管理和具体承包方面的学科有了发展,但项目仍然失败。文学将这些失败归结为各种原因;然而,关于项目的大量文献似乎将失败归因于糟糕的承包实践。合同失败会引起诉讼和长期纠纷,从而递归地导致项目中的各种问题。在项目管理三角形的各个组成部分(即范围、质量、成本和时间)中,经常可以观察到不良合同的影响。合同无处不在,项目主体与承包商之间以及承包商与分包商之间存在合同协议;然而,在这项工作中提出的文献综述主要集中在前者。本文从文献的角度对合同中的软问题进行了讨论,并就建筑项目合同中的信任和伙伴关系如何发挥作用进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Review of Literature on the Role of Trust and Partnering in Success of Construction Projects
Contracting plays a dominant role mostly in large scale and complex projects. Its use in construction projects takes the role of risk transference and governance. Despite the developments taking place in the discipline of project management in general and contracting in specific, projects are still failing. Literature attributes various reasons to these failures; however, a significant body of literature on project seems to attribute failure to poor contracting practice. Contractual failures give rise to situations of litigation and long-running disputes that recursively cause various problems within projects. The effect of poor contracting has often been observed in the various components of the project management triangle (that is, scope, quality, cost, and time). Contracts are pervasive and contractual agreements exist between the project principal and contractors as well as between contractors and sub-contractors; the review of literature presented in this work, however, is focused on the former. This paper presents a discussion from the perspective of the literature pertaining to the softer issues in contracts and provides discussion on how trust and partnering act within the contracts of construction projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信