十字路口:同行评议

C. Jordan
{"title":"十字路口:同行评议","authors":"C. Jordan","doi":"10.1145/1247238.1247242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, it seems that there is a growing number of complaints coming out of academia regarding getting work published at good venues and the importance of having a high publication count. I am sure many of us have heard the phrase \"publish or perish\" before. In fact, there has been a case of a professor leaving his field of research (http://www.cs.utah.edu/~michael/leaving.html) over these issues. He criticizes the peer review process as being both fallible and corrupt in his explanation of why he left. He also discusses what he believes to be misplaced importance that many people have put on publishing at top conferences.","PeriodicalId":429016,"journal":{"name":"ACM Crossroads","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"At a Crossroads: peer review\",\"authors\":\"C. Jordan\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1247238.1247242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently, it seems that there is a growing number of complaints coming out of academia regarding getting work published at good venues and the importance of having a high publication count. I am sure many of us have heard the phrase \\\"publish or perish\\\" before. In fact, there has been a case of a professor leaving his field of research (http://www.cs.utah.edu/~michael/leaving.html) over these issues. He criticizes the peer review process as being both fallible and corrupt in his explanation of why he left. He also discusses what he believes to be misplaced importance that many people have put on publishing at top conferences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":429016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Crossroads\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Crossroads\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1247238.1247242\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Crossroads","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1247238.1247242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,似乎有越来越多的抱怨来自学术界,关于在好的场所发表作品和拥有高发表数量的重要性。我相信我们很多人以前都听过“要么发表,要么灭亡”这句话。事实上,已经出现了教授因这些问题离开自己的研究领域(http://www.cs.utah.edu/~michael/leaving.html)的事例。在解释自己离职的原因时,他批评同行评议过程既容易出错,又腐败。他还讨论了他认为许多人在顶级会议上对出版的重视错位的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
At a Crossroads: peer review
Recently, it seems that there is a growing number of complaints coming out of academia regarding getting work published at good venues and the importance of having a high publication count. I am sure many of us have heard the phrase "publish or perish" before. In fact, there has been a case of a professor leaving his field of research (http://www.cs.utah.edu/~michael/leaving.html) over these issues. He criticizes the peer review process as being both fallible and corrupt in his explanation of why he left. He also discusses what he believes to be misplaced importance that many people have put on publishing at top conferences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信