应用机器学习方法预测青光眼引流失败

Paul Morrison, Maxwell Dixon, A. Sheybani, B. Rahmani
{"title":"应用机器学习方法预测青光眼引流失败","authors":"Paul Morrison, Maxwell Dixon, A. Sheybani, B. Rahmani","doi":"10.5121/IJDKP.2021.11101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this retrospective study is to measure machine learning models' ability to predict glaucoma drainage device failure based on demographic information and preoperative measurements. The medical records of 165 patients were used. Potential predictors included the patients' race, age, sex, preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), preoperative visual acuity, number of IOP-lowering medications, and number and type of previous ophthalmic surgeries. Failure was defined as final IOP greater than 18 mm Hg, reduction in intraocular pressure less than 20% from baseline, or need for reoperation unrelated to normal implant maintenance. Five classifiers were compared: logistic regression, artificial neural network, random forest, decision tree, and support vector machine. Recursive feature elimination was used to shrink the number of predictors and grid search was used to choose hyperparameters. To prevent leakage, nested cross-validation was used throughout. With a small amount of data, the best classfier was logistic regression, but with more data, the best classifier was the random forest.","PeriodicalId":131153,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Data Mining & Knowledge Management Process","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Apply Machine Learning Methods to Predict Failure of Glaucoma Drainage\",\"authors\":\"Paul Morrison, Maxwell Dixon, A. Sheybani, B. Rahmani\",\"doi\":\"10.5121/IJDKP.2021.11101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this retrospective study is to measure machine learning models' ability to predict glaucoma drainage device failure based on demographic information and preoperative measurements. The medical records of 165 patients were used. Potential predictors included the patients' race, age, sex, preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), preoperative visual acuity, number of IOP-lowering medications, and number and type of previous ophthalmic surgeries. Failure was defined as final IOP greater than 18 mm Hg, reduction in intraocular pressure less than 20% from baseline, or need for reoperation unrelated to normal implant maintenance. Five classifiers were compared: logistic regression, artificial neural network, random forest, decision tree, and support vector machine. Recursive feature elimination was used to shrink the number of predictors and grid search was used to choose hyperparameters. To prevent leakage, nested cross-validation was used throughout. With a small amount of data, the best classfier was logistic regression, but with more data, the best classifier was the random forest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Data Mining & Knowledge Management Process\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Data Mining & Knowledge Management Process\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5121/IJDKP.2021.11101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Data Mining & Knowledge Management Process","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5121/IJDKP.2021.11101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本回顾性研究的目的是测量机器学习模型基于人口统计信息和术前测量预测青光眼引流装置失效的能力。使用165例患者的医疗记录。潜在的预测因素包括患者的种族、年龄、性别、术前眼压(IOP)、术前视力、降眼压药物的数量、既往眼科手术的次数和类型。失败定义为最终IOP大于18 mm Hg,眼压较基线下降小于20%,或需要与正常种植体维持无关的再次手术。比较了五种分类器:逻辑回归、人工神经网络、随机森林、决策树和支持向量机。采用递归特征消去法减少预测量,采用网格搜索法选择超参数。为了防止泄漏,在整个过程中使用了嵌套交叉验证。当数据量较小时,最佳分类器是逻辑回归,而当数据量较大时,最佳分类器是随机森林。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Apply Machine Learning Methods to Predict Failure of Glaucoma Drainage
The purpose of this retrospective study is to measure machine learning models' ability to predict glaucoma drainage device failure based on demographic information and preoperative measurements. The medical records of 165 patients were used. Potential predictors included the patients' race, age, sex, preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), preoperative visual acuity, number of IOP-lowering medications, and number and type of previous ophthalmic surgeries. Failure was defined as final IOP greater than 18 mm Hg, reduction in intraocular pressure less than 20% from baseline, or need for reoperation unrelated to normal implant maintenance. Five classifiers were compared: logistic regression, artificial neural network, random forest, decision tree, and support vector machine. Recursive feature elimination was used to shrink the number of predictors and grid search was used to choose hyperparameters. To prevent leakage, nested cross-validation was used throughout. With a small amount of data, the best classfier was logistic regression, but with more data, the best classifier was the random forest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信