实证生产力指数与指标

B. Balk
{"title":"实证生产力指数与指标","authors":"B. Balk","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The empirical measurement of productivity change (or difference) by means of indices and indicators starts with the ex post profit/loss accounts of a production unit. The key concepts are profit, leading to indicators, and profitability, leading to indices. The main task for the productivity analyst is to decompose profit or profitability change into price and quantity components, leading to measures of total factor productivity change and total price recovery. This chapter discusses various input–output models and their linkages; the relation between productivity measurement and growth accounting; the relation between total and partial productivity measures; and aggregation issues. The approach advocated here is able to deliver the same results as the neoclassical approach; for example, it appears that for a table in which output growth is decomposed into the contributions of total factor productivity change and input growth, the neoclassical assumptions are neither necessary nor do they contribute anything to our understanding of what productivity precisely is.","PeriodicalId":448105,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Productivity (Topic)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical Productivity Indices and Indicators\",\"authors\":\"B. Balk\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The empirical measurement of productivity change (or difference) by means of indices and indicators starts with the ex post profit/loss accounts of a production unit. The key concepts are profit, leading to indicators, and profitability, leading to indices. The main task for the productivity analyst is to decompose profit or profitability change into price and quantity components, leading to measures of total factor productivity change and total price recovery. This chapter discusses various input–output models and their linkages; the relation between productivity measurement and growth accounting; the relation between total and partial productivity measures; and aggregation issues. The approach advocated here is able to deliver the same results as the neoclassical approach; for example, it appears that for a table in which output growth is decomposed into the contributions of total factor productivity change and input growth, the neoclassical assumptions are neither necessary nor do they contribute anything to our understanding of what productivity precisely is.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Productivity (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Productivity (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Productivity (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

通过指数和指标对生产率变化(或差异)的实证测量始于生产单位的事后损益账户。关键概念是利润,导致指标和盈利能力,导致指数。生产率分析师的主要任务是将利润或盈利能力的变化分解为价格和数量的组成部分,从而得出全要素生产率变化和总价格恢复的度量。本章讨论各种投入产出模型及其联系;生产率计量与增长核算的关系总生产力测度与部分生产力测度的关系以及聚合问题。这里提倡的方法能够提供与新古典主义方法相同的结果;例如,对于一个将产出增长分解为全要素生产率变化和投入增长贡献的表格,新古典主义假设既没有必要,也无助于我们对生产率究竟是什么的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empirical Productivity Indices and Indicators
The empirical measurement of productivity change (or difference) by means of indices and indicators starts with the ex post profit/loss accounts of a production unit. The key concepts are profit, leading to indicators, and profitability, leading to indices. The main task for the productivity analyst is to decompose profit or profitability change into price and quantity components, leading to measures of total factor productivity change and total price recovery. This chapter discusses various input–output models and their linkages; the relation between productivity measurement and growth accounting; the relation between total and partial productivity measures; and aggregation issues. The approach advocated here is able to deliver the same results as the neoclassical approach; for example, it appears that for a table in which output growth is decomposed into the contributions of total factor productivity change and input growth, the neoclassical assumptions are neither necessary nor do they contribute anything to our understanding of what productivity precisely is.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信