心理咨询师对将神经科学与心理咨询相结合的伦理考虑的看法

C. Luke, Eric T. Beeson, Raissa Miller, Thom A. Field, Laura k. Jones
{"title":"心理咨询师对将神经科学与心理咨询相结合的伦理考虑的看法","authors":"C. Luke, Eric T. Beeson, Raissa Miller, Thom A. Field, Laura k. Jones","doi":"10.15241/cl.10.2.204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As with many advancements in science and technology, ethical standards regarding practice often follow innovation. The integration of neuroscience with counseling is no exception, as scholars are just beginning to identify important ethical concerns related to this shift in the profession. Results of an inductive thematic analysis exploring the perspectives of 312 participants regarding the ethics of integrating neuroscience with counseling are presented. This study is the first of its kind to explore mental health counselors’, counselorsin-training’s, and counselor educators’ perceptions of neuroscience integration. The researchers identified a continuum of concern ranging from no concerns to grave concerns. In addition, they identified four specific ethical quandaries: a) neuroscience does not align with our counselor identity, b) neuroscience is outside the scope of counseling practice, c) challenges with neuroscience and the nature of neuroscience research, and d) potential for harm to clients. Implications include four key considerations for counselors prior to proceeding with integrating neuroscience into practice.","PeriodicalId":179932,"journal":{"name":"The Professional Counselor","volume":"161 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Counselors’ Perceptions of Ethical Considerations for Integrating Neuroscience With Counseling\",\"authors\":\"C. Luke, Eric T. Beeson, Raissa Miller, Thom A. Field, Laura k. Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.15241/cl.10.2.204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As with many advancements in science and technology, ethical standards regarding practice often follow innovation. The integration of neuroscience with counseling is no exception, as scholars are just beginning to identify important ethical concerns related to this shift in the profession. Results of an inductive thematic analysis exploring the perspectives of 312 participants regarding the ethics of integrating neuroscience with counseling are presented. This study is the first of its kind to explore mental health counselors’, counselorsin-training’s, and counselor educators’ perceptions of neuroscience integration. The researchers identified a continuum of concern ranging from no concerns to grave concerns. In addition, they identified four specific ethical quandaries: a) neuroscience does not align with our counselor identity, b) neuroscience is outside the scope of counseling practice, c) challenges with neuroscience and the nature of neuroscience research, and d) potential for harm to clients. Implications include four key considerations for counselors prior to proceeding with integrating neuroscience into practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Professional Counselor\",\"volume\":\"161 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Professional Counselor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15241/cl.10.2.204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Professional Counselor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15241/cl.10.2.204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

随着许多科学技术的进步,实践的道德标准往往伴随着创新。神经科学与咨询的整合也不例外,因为学者们刚刚开始确定与这一职业转变相关的重要伦理问题。一项归纳主题分析的结果,探讨了312名参与者关于整合神经科学与咨询伦理的观点。本研究首次探讨心理健康咨询师、培训咨询师和咨询教育者对神经科学整合的认知。研究人员确定了一个连续的关注范围,从没有关注到严重关注。此外,他们还确定了四个具体的伦理困境:a)神经科学与我们的咨询师身份不一致,b)神经科学超出了咨询实践的范围,c)神经科学的挑战和神经科学研究的本质,d)对客户的潜在伤害。在将神经科学融入实践之前,咨询师需要考虑四个关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Counselors’ Perceptions of Ethical Considerations for Integrating Neuroscience With Counseling
As with many advancements in science and technology, ethical standards regarding practice often follow innovation. The integration of neuroscience with counseling is no exception, as scholars are just beginning to identify important ethical concerns related to this shift in the profession. Results of an inductive thematic analysis exploring the perspectives of 312 participants regarding the ethics of integrating neuroscience with counseling are presented. This study is the first of its kind to explore mental health counselors’, counselorsin-training’s, and counselor educators’ perceptions of neuroscience integration. The researchers identified a continuum of concern ranging from no concerns to grave concerns. In addition, they identified four specific ethical quandaries: a) neuroscience does not align with our counselor identity, b) neuroscience is outside the scope of counseling practice, c) challenges with neuroscience and the nature of neuroscience research, and d) potential for harm to clients. Implications include four key considerations for counselors prior to proceeding with integrating neuroscience into practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信