{"title":"对具有并发输出的规范进行分解,以解决异步逻辑合成中的状态编码冲突","authors":"H. Kapoor, M. B. Josephs","doi":"10.1145/996566.996788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Synthesis of asynchronous logic using the tool Petrify requires a state graph with a complete state coding. It is common for specifications to exhibit concurrent outputs, but Petrify is sometimes unable to resolve the state coding conflicts that arise as a result, and hence cannot synthesise a circuit. A pair of decomposition heuristics (expressed in the language of Delay-Insensitive Sequential Processes) are given that helps one to obtain a synthesisable specification. The second heuristic has been successfully applied to a set of nine benchmarks to obtain significant reductions both in area and in synthesis time, compared with synthesis performed on the original specifications.","PeriodicalId":115059,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 41st Design Automation Conference, 2004.","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decomposing specifications with concurrent outputs to resolve state coding conflicts in asynchronous logic synthesis\",\"authors\":\"H. Kapoor, M. B. Josephs\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/996566.996788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Synthesis of asynchronous logic using the tool Petrify requires a state graph with a complete state coding. It is common for specifications to exhibit concurrent outputs, but Petrify is sometimes unable to resolve the state coding conflicts that arise as a result, and hence cannot synthesise a circuit. A pair of decomposition heuristics (expressed in the language of Delay-Insensitive Sequential Processes) are given that helps one to obtain a synthesisable specification. The second heuristic has been successfully applied to a set of nine benchmarks to obtain significant reductions both in area and in synthesis time, compared with synthesis performed on the original specifications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":115059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. 41st Design Automation Conference, 2004.\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. 41st Design Automation Conference, 2004.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/996566.996788\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 41st Design Automation Conference, 2004.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/996566.996788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Decomposing specifications with concurrent outputs to resolve state coding conflicts in asynchronous logic synthesis
Synthesis of asynchronous logic using the tool Petrify requires a state graph with a complete state coding. It is common for specifications to exhibit concurrent outputs, but Petrify is sometimes unable to resolve the state coding conflicts that arise as a result, and hence cannot synthesise a circuit. A pair of decomposition heuristics (expressed in the language of Delay-Insensitive Sequential Processes) are given that helps one to obtain a synthesisable specification. The second heuristic has been successfully applied to a set of nine benchmarks to obtain significant reductions both in area and in synthesis time, compared with synthesis performed on the original specifications.