对于跨项目缺陷预测,哪个更重要:实例还是特征?

Qiao Yu, Shujuan Jiang, Junyan Qian
{"title":"对于跨项目缺陷预测,哪个更重要:实例还是特征?","authors":"Qiao Yu, Shujuan Jiang, Junyan Qian","doi":"10.1109/SATE.2016.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software defect prediction plays an important role in software testing. We can build the prediction model based on historical data. However, for a new project, we cannot be able to build a good prediction model due to lack of historical data. Therefore, researchers have proposed the cross-project defect prediction (CPDP) methods to share the historical data among different projects. In practice, there may be the problems of instance distribution differences and feature redundancy in cross-project datasets. To investigate which is more important for CPDP, instance or feature, we take instance filter and feature selection as examples to show their efficiency for CPDP. Our experiments are conducted on NASA and PROMISE datasets, and the results indicate that feature selection performs better than instance filter in improving the performance of CPDP. We can conclude that feature could be more important than instance for CPDP.","PeriodicalId":344531,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Conference on Software Analysis, Testing and Evolution (SATE)","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which Is More Important for Cross-Project Defect Prediction: Instance or Feature?\",\"authors\":\"Qiao Yu, Shujuan Jiang, Junyan Qian\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SATE.2016.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software defect prediction plays an important role in software testing. We can build the prediction model based on historical data. However, for a new project, we cannot be able to build a good prediction model due to lack of historical data. Therefore, researchers have proposed the cross-project defect prediction (CPDP) methods to share the historical data among different projects. In practice, there may be the problems of instance distribution differences and feature redundancy in cross-project datasets. To investigate which is more important for CPDP, instance or feature, we take instance filter and feature selection as examples to show their efficiency for CPDP. Our experiments are conducted on NASA and PROMISE datasets, and the results indicate that feature selection performs better than instance filter in improving the performance of CPDP. We can conclude that feature could be more important than instance for CPDP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344531,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 International Conference on Software Analysis, Testing and Evolution (SATE)\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 International Conference on Software Analysis, Testing and Evolution (SATE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SATE.2016.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Conference on Software Analysis, Testing and Evolution (SATE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SATE.2016.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

软件缺陷预测在软件测试中起着重要的作用。我们可以根据历史数据建立预测模型。然而,对于一个新项目,由于缺乏历史数据,我们无法建立一个很好的预测模型。因此,研究人员提出了跨项目缺陷预测(CPDP)方法,以便在不同项目之间共享历史数据。在实际应用中,跨项目数据集可能存在实例分布差异和特征冗余的问题。为了研究实例和特征哪个对CPDP更重要,我们以实例滤波和特征选择为例来说明它们在CPDP中的效率。我们在NASA和PROMISE数据集上进行了实验,结果表明特征选择在提高CPDP性能方面优于实例滤波。我们可以得出结论,对于CPDP来说,功能可能比实例更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Which Is More Important for Cross-Project Defect Prediction: Instance or Feature?
Software defect prediction plays an important role in software testing. We can build the prediction model based on historical data. However, for a new project, we cannot be able to build a good prediction model due to lack of historical data. Therefore, researchers have proposed the cross-project defect prediction (CPDP) methods to share the historical data among different projects. In practice, there may be the problems of instance distribution differences and feature redundancy in cross-project datasets. To investigate which is more important for CPDP, instance or feature, we take instance filter and feature selection as examples to show their efficiency for CPDP. Our experiments are conducted on NASA and PROMISE datasets, and the results indicate that feature selection performs better than instance filter in improving the performance of CPDP. We can conclude that feature could be more important than instance for CPDP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信