验证具有优先级继承锁的周期性程序

S. Chaki, A. Gurfinkel, O. Strichman
{"title":"验证具有优先级继承锁的周期性程序","authors":"S. Chaki, A. Gurfinkel, O. Strichman","doi":"10.1109/FMCAD.2013.6679402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Periodic real-time programs are ubiquitous: they control robots, radars, medical equipment, etc. They consist of a set of tasks, each of which executes (in a separate thread) a specific job, periodically. A common synchronization mechanism for such programs is via Priority Inheritance Protocol (PIP) locks. PIP locks have low programming overhead, but cause deadlocks if used incorrectly. We address the problem of verifying safety and deadlock freedom of such programs. Our approach is based on sequentialization - converting the periodic program to an equivalent (non-deterministic) sequential program, and verifying it with a model checker. Our algorithm, called pipVerif, is iterative and optimal - it terminates after sequentializing with the smallest number of rounds required to either find a counterexample, or prove the program safe and deadlock-free. We implemented pipVerif and validated it on a number of examples derived from a robot controller.","PeriodicalId":346097,"journal":{"name":"2013 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design","volume":"407 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Verifying periodic programs with priority inheritance locks\",\"authors\":\"S. Chaki, A. Gurfinkel, O. Strichman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FMCAD.2013.6679402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Periodic real-time programs are ubiquitous: they control robots, radars, medical equipment, etc. They consist of a set of tasks, each of which executes (in a separate thread) a specific job, periodically. A common synchronization mechanism for such programs is via Priority Inheritance Protocol (PIP) locks. PIP locks have low programming overhead, but cause deadlocks if used incorrectly. We address the problem of verifying safety and deadlock freedom of such programs. Our approach is based on sequentialization - converting the periodic program to an equivalent (non-deterministic) sequential program, and verifying it with a model checker. Our algorithm, called pipVerif, is iterative and optimal - it terminates after sequentializing with the smallest number of rounds required to either find a counterexample, or prove the program safe and deadlock-free. We implemented pipVerif and validated it on a number of examples derived from a robot controller.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design\",\"volume\":\"407 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FMCAD.2013.6679402\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FMCAD.2013.6679402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

周期性实时程序无处不在:它们控制着机器人、雷达、医疗设备等。它们由一组任务组成,每个任务(在单独的线程中)定期执行一个特定的作业。这类程序的常见同步机制是通过优先级继承协议(Priority Inheritance Protocol, PIP)锁。PIP锁具有较低的编程开销,但如果使用不当会导致死锁。我们解决了验证这些程序的安全性和死锁自由的问题。我们的方法基于顺序化——将周期性程序转换为等效的(不确定的)顺序程序,并用模型检查器对其进行验证。我们的算法称为pipVerif,是迭代的和最优的——它在找到反例或证明程序安全且无死锁所需的最小轮数排序后终止。我们实现了pipVerif,并在来自机器人控制器的许多示例上验证了它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Verifying periodic programs with priority inheritance locks
Periodic real-time programs are ubiquitous: they control robots, radars, medical equipment, etc. They consist of a set of tasks, each of which executes (in a separate thread) a specific job, periodically. A common synchronization mechanism for such programs is via Priority Inheritance Protocol (PIP) locks. PIP locks have low programming overhead, but cause deadlocks if used incorrectly. We address the problem of verifying safety and deadlock freedom of such programs. Our approach is based on sequentialization - converting the periodic program to an equivalent (non-deterministic) sequential program, and verifying it with a model checker. Our algorithm, called pipVerif, is iterative and optimal - it terminates after sequentializing with the smallest number of rounds required to either find a counterexample, or prove the program safe and deadlock-free. We implemented pipVerif and validated it on a number of examples derived from a robot controller.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信