协作系统中多维分析与改进的参与式方法

Bernardo Alves Villarinho Lima, L. Almeida
{"title":"协作系统中多维分析与改进的参与式方法","authors":"Bernardo Alves Villarinho Lima, L. Almeida","doi":"10.1145/3274192.3274194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The difficulty of evaluating collaborative systems is a historical challenge, since the multiple dimensions of collaboration are considered success factors for the system, and these factors go beyond individual interaction. Adopting the fundamentals of Participatory Design, this paper presents a multidimensional method for evaluating and proposing improvements on collaborative systems. The method involves three phases: (1) a presential briefing phase; (2) a non-presential observation phase; and (3) a Future Workshop phase. Instances of the proposed method seek to involve users as co-designers, making informed and relevant decisions about the future of a system which they could learn and use. This paper also presents the results of a preliminary evaluation, which consists in an instance of the method: evaluating and proposing improvements on a groupware prototype. The instance is compared to a traditional groupware evaluation method, exposing that the instance, not only identified similar collaboration-related issues, but also identified issues that were not identified by the inspection. During the experiment, participants informed us about issues experienced while collaborating and how they were perceived, and elicited possible futures in which the system would have more value to their objectives.","PeriodicalId":314561,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"283 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Participatory Method for Multidimensional Analysis and Proposing Improvements in Collaborative Systems\",\"authors\":\"Bernardo Alves Villarinho Lima, L. Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3274192.3274194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The difficulty of evaluating collaborative systems is a historical challenge, since the multiple dimensions of collaboration are considered success factors for the system, and these factors go beyond individual interaction. Adopting the fundamentals of Participatory Design, this paper presents a multidimensional method for evaluating and proposing improvements on collaborative systems. The method involves three phases: (1) a presential briefing phase; (2) a non-presential observation phase; and (3) a Future Workshop phase. Instances of the proposed method seek to involve users as co-designers, making informed and relevant decisions about the future of a system which they could learn and use. This paper also presents the results of a preliminary evaluation, which consists in an instance of the method: evaluating and proposing improvements on a groupware prototype. The instance is compared to a traditional groupware evaluation method, exposing that the instance, not only identified similar collaboration-related issues, but also identified issues that were not identified by the inspection. During the experiment, participants informed us about issues experienced while collaborating and how they were perceived, and elicited possible futures in which the system would have more value to their objectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"volume\":\"283 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3274192.3274194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3274192.3274194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估协作系统的困难是一个历史性的挑战,因为协作的多个维度被认为是系统的成功因素,这些因素超越了个体的相互作用。采用参与式设计的基本原理,本文提出了一种多维度的方法来评估和提出对协作系统的改进。该方法包括三个阶段:(1)演示简报阶段;(2)非呈现观测阶段;(3)未来研讨会阶段。所建议的方法的实例设法让用户作为共同设计者参与其中,对他们可以学习和使用的系统的未来作出知情和相关的决定。本文还给出了一个初步评估的结果,其中包括该方法的一个实例:对一个群件原型进行评估并提出改进建议。将实例与传统的群件评估方法进行比较,发现实例不仅识别了类似的与协作相关的问题,而且还识别了未被检查识别的问题。在实验过程中,参与者告诉我们在合作过程中遇到的问题,以及他们如何看待这些问题,并引出系统对他们的目标更有价值的可能未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Participatory Method for Multidimensional Analysis and Proposing Improvements in Collaborative Systems
The difficulty of evaluating collaborative systems is a historical challenge, since the multiple dimensions of collaboration are considered success factors for the system, and these factors go beyond individual interaction. Adopting the fundamentals of Participatory Design, this paper presents a multidimensional method for evaluating and proposing improvements on collaborative systems. The method involves three phases: (1) a presential briefing phase; (2) a non-presential observation phase; and (3) a Future Workshop phase. Instances of the proposed method seek to involve users as co-designers, making informed and relevant decisions about the future of a system which they could learn and use. This paper also presents the results of a preliminary evaluation, which consists in an instance of the method: evaluating and proposing improvements on a groupware prototype. The instance is compared to a traditional groupware evaluation method, exposing that the instance, not only identified similar collaboration-related issues, but also identified issues that were not identified by the inspection. During the experiment, participants informed us about issues experienced while collaborating and how they were perceived, and elicited possible futures in which the system would have more value to their objectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信