特征选择技术在学生成绩分类中的比较研究

Wattana Punlumjeak, Nachirat Rachburee
{"title":"特征选择技术在学生成绩分类中的比较研究","authors":"Wattana Punlumjeak, Nachirat Rachburee","doi":"10.1109/ICITEED.2015.7408984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Student performance classification is a challenging task for teacher and stakeholder for better academic planning and management. Data mining can be used to find knowledge from student data to improve the performance of classifying model. Before applying a classification model, feature selection method is proposed in data preprocessing process to find out the most significant and intrinsic features. In this research, we propose a comparison of four feature selection methods: genetic algorithms, support vector machine, information gain, and minimum redundancy and maximum relevance with four supervised classifiers: naive bays, decision tree, k-nearest neighbor, and neural network. The experimental results show that the minimum redundancy and maximum relevance feature selection method with 10 feature selected give the best result on 91.12% accuracy with a k-nearest neighbor classifier. The result of the present study shows that the advantage of future selection to find a minimum and significant of feature is more effective to classify the student performance.","PeriodicalId":207985,"journal":{"name":"2015 7th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of feature selection techniques for classify student performance\",\"authors\":\"Wattana Punlumjeak, Nachirat Rachburee\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICITEED.2015.7408984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Student performance classification is a challenging task for teacher and stakeholder for better academic planning and management. Data mining can be used to find knowledge from student data to improve the performance of classifying model. Before applying a classification model, feature selection method is proposed in data preprocessing process to find out the most significant and intrinsic features. In this research, we propose a comparison of four feature selection methods: genetic algorithms, support vector machine, information gain, and minimum redundancy and maximum relevance with four supervised classifiers: naive bays, decision tree, k-nearest neighbor, and neural network. The experimental results show that the minimum redundancy and maximum relevance feature selection method with 10 feature selected give the best result on 91.12% accuracy with a k-nearest neighbor classifier. The result of the present study shows that the advantage of future selection to find a minimum and significant of feature is more effective to classify the student performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":207985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 7th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 7th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITEED.2015.7408984\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 7th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITEED.2015.7408984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

学生成绩分类对教师和利益相关者来说是一项具有挑战性的任务,以更好地进行学术规划和管理。数据挖掘可以从学生数据中发现知识,从而提高分类模型的性能。在应用分类模型之前,在数据预处理过程中提出特征选择方法,找出最显著的和内在的特征。在这项研究中,我们提出了四种特征选择方法:遗传算法、支持向量机、信息增益、最小冗余和最大相关性与四种监督分类器:朴素贝叶斯、决策树、k近邻和神经网络的比较。实验结果表明,选择10个特征的最小冗余和最大相关性特征选择方法在k近邻分类器下的准确率为91.12%。本研究的结果表明,未来选择的优势是寻找最小和显著的特征是更有效的分类学生的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study of feature selection techniques for classify student performance
Student performance classification is a challenging task for teacher and stakeholder for better academic planning and management. Data mining can be used to find knowledge from student data to improve the performance of classifying model. Before applying a classification model, feature selection method is proposed in data preprocessing process to find out the most significant and intrinsic features. In this research, we propose a comparison of four feature selection methods: genetic algorithms, support vector machine, information gain, and minimum redundancy and maximum relevance with four supervised classifiers: naive bays, decision tree, k-nearest neighbor, and neural network. The experimental results show that the minimum redundancy and maximum relevance feature selection method with 10 feature selected give the best result on 91.12% accuracy with a k-nearest neighbor classifier. The result of the present study shows that the advantage of future selection to find a minimum and significant of feature is more effective to classify the student performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信