加纳北部的环境卫生和个人卫生习惯:家庭健康风险分析

I. K. Osumanu, Awzai Mohammed Amin
{"title":"加纳北部的环境卫生和个人卫生习惯:家庭健康风险分析","authors":"I. K. Osumanu, Awzai Mohammed Amin","doi":"10.4314/gjds.v20i1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study assessed household health risks in relation to sanitation and hygiene practices. A convergent parallel mixed method design, involving a survey  of 200 household heads and two semi-structured interviews, was employed. The forward linear regression method was used to determine how  sanitation and hygiene practices influence household health risks. From the results, age was the most considered criterion for using a homestead toilet  facility. Income made the most significant contribution to change in the choice of toilet facility with a Beta Weight of 0.313 at a statistically significant level  of p<0.00. Income was again identified to be the most statistically significant determining factor for access to sanitation and hygiene materials with  0.389 at a significant alpha level of p<0.00. The identified factors that define sanitation and hygiene practices cut across gender division of labour, age,  occupation, housing type and residential location. Owing to the range of demographic, social and economic factors influencing the adoption of proper  sanitation and hygiene practices, it is recommended that sanitation and hygiene improvement interventions should inculcate socio-demographic and   economic concepts to reduce household health risks.","PeriodicalId":110495,"journal":{"name":"Ghana Journal of Development Studies","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sanitation and Hygiene Practices in Northern Ghana: An Analysis of Household Health Risks\",\"authors\":\"I. K. Osumanu, Awzai Mohammed Amin\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/gjds.v20i1.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study assessed household health risks in relation to sanitation and hygiene practices. A convergent parallel mixed method design, involving a survey  of 200 household heads and two semi-structured interviews, was employed. The forward linear regression method was used to determine how  sanitation and hygiene practices influence household health risks. From the results, age was the most considered criterion for using a homestead toilet  facility. Income made the most significant contribution to change in the choice of toilet facility with a Beta Weight of 0.313 at a statistically significant level  of p<0.00. Income was again identified to be the most statistically significant determining factor for access to sanitation and hygiene materials with  0.389 at a significant alpha level of p<0.00. The identified factors that define sanitation and hygiene practices cut across gender division of labour, age,  occupation, housing type and residential location. Owing to the range of demographic, social and economic factors influencing the adoption of proper  sanitation and hygiene practices, it is recommended that sanitation and hygiene improvement interventions should inculcate socio-demographic and   economic concepts to reduce household health risks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":110495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ghana Journal of Development Studies\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ghana Journal of Development Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/gjds.v20i1.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ghana Journal of Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/gjds.v20i1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究评估了与环境卫生和个人卫生习惯有关的家庭健康风险。采用收敛平行混合方法设计,包括对200户户主的调查和两次半结构化访谈。采用正向线性回归方法确定环境卫生和个人卫生习惯如何影响家庭健康风险。从结果来看,年龄是使用宅基地厕所设施最考虑的标准。收入对厕所设施选择变化的贡献最为显著,贝塔权重为0.313,p<0.00,具有统计学显著性水平。收入再次被确定为获得卫生设施和卫生用品的最具统计学意义的决定因素,在显著α水平p<0.00时为0.389。确定环境卫生和个人卫生习惯的因素跨越了性别、劳动分工、年龄、职业、住房类型和居住地点。由于影响采用适当的环境卫生和个人卫生习惯的人口、社会和经济因素的范围很广泛,因此建议改善环境卫生和个人卫生的干预措施应反复灌输社会人口和经济概念,以减少家庭健康风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sanitation and Hygiene Practices in Northern Ghana: An Analysis of Household Health Risks
This study assessed household health risks in relation to sanitation and hygiene practices. A convergent parallel mixed method design, involving a survey  of 200 household heads and two semi-structured interviews, was employed. The forward linear regression method was used to determine how  sanitation and hygiene practices influence household health risks. From the results, age was the most considered criterion for using a homestead toilet  facility. Income made the most significant contribution to change in the choice of toilet facility with a Beta Weight of 0.313 at a statistically significant level  of p<0.00. Income was again identified to be the most statistically significant determining factor for access to sanitation and hygiene materials with  0.389 at a significant alpha level of p<0.00. The identified factors that define sanitation and hygiene practices cut across gender division of labour, age,  occupation, housing type and residential location. Owing to the range of demographic, social and economic factors influencing the adoption of proper  sanitation and hygiene practices, it is recommended that sanitation and hygiene improvement interventions should inculcate socio-demographic and   economic concepts to reduce household health risks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信