战略家的观点需要从计划延伸到执行

T. Galpin
{"title":"战略家的观点需要从计划延伸到执行","authors":"T. Galpin","doi":"10.1108/sl-04-2023-0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe Oxford Strategy Insights Project was designed to assess the current approaches, aims, and focus of strategists across industries and geographies.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe project received input from 167 executives and managers across twenty-six industries, spanning over thirty countries, regarding their firm’s strategy process.\n\n\nFindings\nThe biggest gap highlighted by the Oxford Strategy Insights Project is effective strategy execution. An overwhelming majority of respondents indicated that their organization’s strategy execution efforts are ineffective and slow, with accelerated implementation being the exception rather than the norm. In line with these findings, few firms appear to be applying the best practice of establishing an implementation management infrastructure including a “Program Manager” tasked to manage and coordinate the firm’s strategy implementation effort. The one positive element related to strategy execution is that most firms seem to have an effective strategic measurement and reporting process.\n\n\nPractical implications\nOrganizations that can execute their strategies increase the likelihood of realizing the full potential of their plans. However, the study’s main finding is that effective strategy execution is severely lacking. Strategists need to become more foresighted, with a much greater focus on implementation.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nAlthough the value of effective strategy execution has been well documented for over five-decades in both academic and management practice literature, new research has found that most strategists are still short-sighted, viewing strategy as primarily planning with a limited focus on implementation.\n","PeriodicalId":169963,"journal":{"name":"Strategy & Leadership","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The strategist’s view needs to extend beyond planning to execution\",\"authors\":\"T. Galpin\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/sl-04-2023-0038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe Oxford Strategy Insights Project was designed to assess the current approaches, aims, and focus of strategists across industries and geographies.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe project received input from 167 executives and managers across twenty-six industries, spanning over thirty countries, regarding their firm’s strategy process.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe biggest gap highlighted by the Oxford Strategy Insights Project is effective strategy execution. An overwhelming majority of respondents indicated that their organization’s strategy execution efforts are ineffective and slow, with accelerated implementation being the exception rather than the norm. In line with these findings, few firms appear to be applying the best practice of establishing an implementation management infrastructure including a “Program Manager” tasked to manage and coordinate the firm’s strategy implementation effort. The one positive element related to strategy execution is that most firms seem to have an effective strategic measurement and reporting process.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nOrganizations that can execute their strategies increase the likelihood of realizing the full potential of their plans. However, the study’s main finding is that effective strategy execution is severely lacking. Strategists need to become more foresighted, with a much greater focus on implementation.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nAlthough the value of effective strategy execution has been well documented for over five-decades in both academic and management practice literature, new research has found that most strategists are still short-sighted, viewing strategy as primarily planning with a limited focus on implementation.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":169963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strategy & Leadership\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strategy & Leadership\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/sl-04-2023-0038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategy & Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sl-04-2023-0038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牛津战略洞察项目旨在评估不同行业和地区战略家当前的方法、目标和重点。设计/方法/方法该项目收到了来自30多个国家的26个行业的167名高管和经理关于其公司战略流程的意见。牛津战略洞察项目强调的最大差距是有效的战略执行。绝大多数受访者表示,他们组织的战略执行工作效率低下且缓慢,加速实施是例外,而不是常态。与这些发现一致,很少有公司似乎在应用建立实施管理基础设施的最佳实践,包括负责管理和协调公司战略实施工作的“项目经理”。与战略执行相关的一个积极因素是,大多数公司似乎都有一个有效的战略衡量和报告过程。实际意义能够执行其战略的组织增加了实现其计划全部潜力的可能性。然而,该研究的主要发现是严重缺乏有效的战略执行。战略家需要变得更有远见,更注重实施。原创性/价值尽管50多年来,在学术和管理实践文献中,有效战略执行的价值已经得到了充分的证明,但新的研究发现,大多数战略家仍然目光短浅,将战略主要视为规划,而对实施的关注有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The strategist’s view needs to extend beyond planning to execution
Purpose The Oxford Strategy Insights Project was designed to assess the current approaches, aims, and focus of strategists across industries and geographies. Design/methodology/approach The project received input from 167 executives and managers across twenty-six industries, spanning over thirty countries, regarding their firm’s strategy process. Findings The biggest gap highlighted by the Oxford Strategy Insights Project is effective strategy execution. An overwhelming majority of respondents indicated that their organization’s strategy execution efforts are ineffective and slow, with accelerated implementation being the exception rather than the norm. In line with these findings, few firms appear to be applying the best practice of establishing an implementation management infrastructure including a “Program Manager” tasked to manage and coordinate the firm’s strategy implementation effort. The one positive element related to strategy execution is that most firms seem to have an effective strategic measurement and reporting process. Practical implications Organizations that can execute their strategies increase the likelihood of realizing the full potential of their plans. However, the study’s main finding is that effective strategy execution is severely lacking. Strategists need to become more foresighted, with a much greater focus on implementation. Originality/value Although the value of effective strategy execution has been well documented for over five-decades in both academic and management practice literature, new research has found that most strategists are still short-sighted, viewing strategy as primarily planning with a limited focus on implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信