慢性细菌性前列腺炎的现代治疗方法。

M. Katibov, M. Alibekov
{"title":"慢性细菌性前列腺炎的现代治疗方法。","authors":"M. Katibov, M. Alibekov","doi":"10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-2-130-139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The main treatment option for chronic bacterial prostatitis (CBP) is antimicrobial therapy. However, in connection with the steady increase in resistance to antimicrobial drugs and the high rate of failure in the treatment of such patients, it seems relevant to study new approaches to the treatment of this disease. Materials and methods. The review is based on articles published over the past 10 years (2011-2021) in scientific peer-reviewed journals included in the PubMed databases (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/) and the Scientific Electronic Library Elibrary.ru (https://elibrary.ru/). The search was carried out for the following keywords: «prostatitis», «chronic prostatitis», «chronic bactrial prostatitis», «chronic infectious prostatitis». At the first stage, 477 sources were found that were relevant to the topic of the review, of which 70 articles were selected for the final version of the review. Results. Oral antibiotic therapy remains the mainstay of treatment for CBP. There is a tendency towards an increase in resistance to traditionally used antimicrobial agents (fluoroquinolones, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, etc.). In this regard, the possibilities of alternative antibacterial drugs (fosfomycin, etc.) and other methods of treatment are actively used and are being studied: direct administration of antimicrobial drugs into the prostate gland, chronic oral antibiotic prophylaxis, phage therapy and surgical interventions. An important role in the treatment of CBP is assigned to other pharmacological groups of drugs and non-drug methods of treatment (primarily physiotherapeutic methods). Conclusion. Many therapies that are used in addition to or instead of oral antibiotic therapy still cannot be recommended for use in general clinical practice, since there is currently a lack of sufficient evidence of their effectiveness and safety. Therefore, considering the existing problems of treating such patients, the need to continue studies to assess the possibilities of new promising approaches to the treatment of CBP remains relevant.","PeriodicalId":123040,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and Сlinical Urology","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modern approaches to the treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis.\",\"authors\":\"M. Katibov, M. Alibekov\",\"doi\":\"10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-2-130-139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The main treatment option for chronic bacterial prostatitis (CBP) is antimicrobial therapy. However, in connection with the steady increase in resistance to antimicrobial drugs and the high rate of failure in the treatment of such patients, it seems relevant to study new approaches to the treatment of this disease. Materials and methods. The review is based on articles published over the past 10 years (2011-2021) in scientific peer-reviewed journals included in the PubMed databases (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/) and the Scientific Electronic Library Elibrary.ru (https://elibrary.ru/). The search was carried out for the following keywords: «prostatitis», «chronic prostatitis», «chronic bactrial prostatitis», «chronic infectious prostatitis». At the first stage, 477 sources were found that were relevant to the topic of the review, of which 70 articles were selected for the final version of the review. Results. Oral antibiotic therapy remains the mainstay of treatment for CBP. There is a tendency towards an increase in resistance to traditionally used antimicrobial agents (fluoroquinolones, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, etc.). In this regard, the possibilities of alternative antibacterial drugs (fosfomycin, etc.) and other methods of treatment are actively used and are being studied: direct administration of antimicrobial drugs into the prostate gland, chronic oral antibiotic prophylaxis, phage therapy and surgical interventions. An important role in the treatment of CBP is assigned to other pharmacological groups of drugs and non-drug methods of treatment (primarily physiotherapeutic methods). Conclusion. Many therapies that are used in addition to or instead of oral antibiotic therapy still cannot be recommended for use in general clinical practice, since there is currently a lack of sufficient evidence of their effectiveness and safety. Therefore, considering the existing problems of treating such patients, the need to continue studies to assess the possibilities of new promising approaches to the treatment of CBP remains relevant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental and Сlinical Urology\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental and Сlinical Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-2-130-139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and Сlinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-2-130-139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。慢性细菌性前列腺炎(CBP)的主要治疗选择是抗菌治疗。然而,考虑到对抗菌素药物的耐药性不断增加以及对这类患者的治疗失败率很高,似乎有必要研究治疗这种疾病的新方法。材料和方法。该综述基于过去10年(2011-2021年)发表在PubMed数据库(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/)和科学电子图书馆图书馆.ru (https://elibrary.ru/)中同行评议的科学期刊上的文章。搜索的关键词是:“前列腺炎”、“慢性前列腺炎”、“慢性细菌性前列腺炎”、“慢性感染性前列腺炎”。在第一阶段,共发现与综述主题相关的文献来源477篇,其中70篇入选最终审稿。结果。口服抗生素治疗仍然是CBP的主要治疗方法。对传统使用的抗菌剂(氟喹诺酮类、甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑等)的耐药性有增加的趋势。在这方面,替代抗菌药物(磷霉素等)和其他治疗方法的可能性正在积极使用和研究:直接给药进入前列腺,慢性口服抗生素预防,噬菌体治疗和手术干预。在CBP的治疗中,重要的作用是分配给其他药物药理组和非药物治疗方法(主要是物理治疗方法)。结论。由于目前缺乏足够的证据证明其有效性和安全性,许多用于口服抗生素治疗之外或替代口服抗生素治疗的疗法仍不能推荐用于一般临床实践。因此,考虑到治疗此类患者存在的问题,有必要继续研究以评估治疗CBP的新方法的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modern approaches to the treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis.
Introduction. The main treatment option for chronic bacterial prostatitis (CBP) is antimicrobial therapy. However, in connection with the steady increase in resistance to antimicrobial drugs and the high rate of failure in the treatment of such patients, it seems relevant to study new approaches to the treatment of this disease. Materials and methods. The review is based on articles published over the past 10 years (2011-2021) in scientific peer-reviewed journals included in the PubMed databases (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/) and the Scientific Electronic Library Elibrary.ru (https://elibrary.ru/). The search was carried out for the following keywords: «prostatitis», «chronic prostatitis», «chronic bactrial prostatitis», «chronic infectious prostatitis». At the first stage, 477 sources were found that were relevant to the topic of the review, of which 70 articles were selected for the final version of the review. Results. Oral antibiotic therapy remains the mainstay of treatment for CBP. There is a tendency towards an increase in resistance to traditionally used antimicrobial agents (fluoroquinolones, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, etc.). In this regard, the possibilities of alternative antibacterial drugs (fosfomycin, etc.) and other methods of treatment are actively used and are being studied: direct administration of antimicrobial drugs into the prostate gland, chronic oral antibiotic prophylaxis, phage therapy and surgical interventions. An important role in the treatment of CBP is assigned to other pharmacological groups of drugs and non-drug methods of treatment (primarily physiotherapeutic methods). Conclusion. Many therapies that are used in addition to or instead of oral antibiotic therapy still cannot be recommended for use in general clinical practice, since there is currently a lack of sufficient evidence of their effectiveness and safety. Therefore, considering the existing problems of treating such patients, the need to continue studies to assess the possibilities of new promising approaches to the treatment of CBP remains relevant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信