法律责任的性质和实现形式

Aleksandrs Baikovs
{"title":"法律责任的性质和实现形式","authors":"Aleksandrs Baikovs","doi":"10.17770/ACJ.V4I85.4015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on the research of one of the fundamental institutions of law – legal liability, the role and importance of which in the current period of formation of the rule of law in Latvia is constantly increasing. However, many issues of legal liability are still under discussion. In recent years the problem of liability mainly out of legal problem, turned into a problem of interdisciplinary nature. The generic notion, in relation to legal liability, is social responsibility. The evolution of views on the nature of legal liability has resulted in the emergence of the concept of positive legal liability. The initial methodological premise of the research of legal liability is to address to the issue of social responsibility, since the general characteristics and forms of realization inherent in social responsibility, inevitably find their expression both: in legal responsibility and its individual types. Traditionally, legal liability is limited by its interpretation as liability for the past, i.e. negative liability. At the same time, attention is drawn to the diversity of views and interpretations of supporters of this approach. However, in recent decades, there has been a growing body of research on positive (prospective) responsibility, whose proponents are also diverse. Moreover, in science it is suggested, that responsibility can be extremely positive, along with which, the protection of violated subjective rights and interests protected by law, is provided by measures of state coercion. http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/acj.v4i85.4015 Legal liability is considered in the article as an holistic phenomenon, dialectical unity of responsibility for past actions (retrospective responsibility) and responsibility for present and future behavior (positive, prospective responsibility), which develops and is implemented in a voluntary or compulsory form in regulatory legal relations. Legal liability is characterized by a number of specific features. Among them: (1) legal liability is based on legal norms, that give it certainty and general compulsion; (2) state guarantee; (3) provision of state coercion or persuasion; (4) legal liability as a necessary consequence has the approval or conviction, encouragement or punishment; (5) legal liability is implemented in the procedural form, provided for by law; (6) essentially, legal liability is a uniform, but it is exercised in two different forms. The theories and concepts of legal liability, presented in the scientific literature were critically analyzed in the article and on this basis its concept is being formulated, the specific features inherent in legal liability are being identified, its unity and the presence of various forms of implementation are being alleged.","PeriodicalId":190864,"journal":{"name":"Administrative and Criminal Justice","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NATURE AND FORMS OF REALIZATION OF LEGAL LIABILITY\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandrs Baikovs\",\"doi\":\"10.17770/ACJ.V4I85.4015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article focuses on the research of one of the fundamental institutions of law – legal liability, the role and importance of which in the current period of formation of the rule of law in Latvia is constantly increasing. However, many issues of legal liability are still under discussion. In recent years the problem of liability mainly out of legal problem, turned into a problem of interdisciplinary nature. The generic notion, in relation to legal liability, is social responsibility. The evolution of views on the nature of legal liability has resulted in the emergence of the concept of positive legal liability. The initial methodological premise of the research of legal liability is to address to the issue of social responsibility, since the general characteristics and forms of realization inherent in social responsibility, inevitably find their expression both: in legal responsibility and its individual types. Traditionally, legal liability is limited by its interpretation as liability for the past, i.e. negative liability. At the same time, attention is drawn to the diversity of views and interpretations of supporters of this approach. However, in recent decades, there has been a growing body of research on positive (prospective) responsibility, whose proponents are also diverse. Moreover, in science it is suggested, that responsibility can be extremely positive, along with which, the protection of violated subjective rights and interests protected by law, is provided by measures of state coercion. http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/acj.v4i85.4015 Legal liability is considered in the article as an holistic phenomenon, dialectical unity of responsibility for past actions (retrospective responsibility) and responsibility for present and future behavior (positive, prospective responsibility), which develops and is implemented in a voluntary or compulsory form in regulatory legal relations. Legal liability is characterized by a number of specific features. Among them: (1) legal liability is based on legal norms, that give it certainty and general compulsion; (2) state guarantee; (3) provision of state coercion or persuasion; (4) legal liability as a necessary consequence has the approval or conviction, encouragement or punishment; (5) legal liability is implemented in the procedural form, provided for by law; (6) essentially, legal liability is a uniform, but it is exercised in two different forms. The theories and concepts of legal liability, presented in the scientific literature were critically analyzed in the article and on this basis its concept is being formulated, the specific features inherent in legal liability are being identified, its unity and the presence of various forms of implementation are being alleged.\",\"PeriodicalId\":190864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administrative and Criminal Justice\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administrative and Criminal Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17770/ACJ.V4I85.4015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative and Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17770/ACJ.V4I85.4015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文重点研究了拉脱维亚最基本的法律制度之一——法律责任制度,在拉脱维亚法治建设的当前阶段,法律责任制度的作用和重要性日益增强。然而,许多法律责任问题仍在讨论中。近年来,责任问题主要脱离了法律问题,变成了一个跨学科的问题。与法律责任相关的一般概念是社会责任。对法律责任性质认识的演变导致了积极法律责任概念的产生。研究法律责任的最初方法论前提是解决社会责任问题,因为社会责任所固有的一般特征和实现形式,不可避免地在法律责任及其个别类型中都有表现。传统上,法律责任受限于对过去责任的解释,即负责任。与此同时,人们注意到这一方法的支持者的观点和解释的多样性。然而,近几十年来,关于积极(预期)责任的研究越来越多,其支持者也各不相同。此外,在科学中,有人提出,责任可以是非常积极的,与此同时,国家强制措施提供了对受法律保护的被侵犯的主观权利和利益的保护。http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/acj.v4i85.4015法律责任是一种整体现象,是对过去行为的责任(溯及性责任)与对现在和未来行为的责任(积极的、前瞻性的责任)的辩证统一,在规范性法律关系中以自愿或强制的形式发展和实施。法律责任具有若干具体特征。其中:(1)法律责任建立在法律规范的基础上,具有确定性和普遍的强制性;(二)国家担保;(三)国家强制、说服的;(四)法律责任作为必然后果得到批准或者定罪、鼓励或者处罚的;(五)法律规定以程序形式履行法律责任的;(6)法律责任本质上是统一的,只是以两种不同的形式行使。本文对科学文献中提出的法律责任的理论和概念进行了批判性分析,并在此基础上制定了法律责任的概念,确定了法律责任固有的具体特征,提出了法律责任的统一性和存在各种执行形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
NATURE AND FORMS OF REALIZATION OF LEGAL LIABILITY
The article focuses on the research of one of the fundamental institutions of law – legal liability, the role and importance of which in the current period of formation of the rule of law in Latvia is constantly increasing. However, many issues of legal liability are still under discussion. In recent years the problem of liability mainly out of legal problem, turned into a problem of interdisciplinary nature. The generic notion, in relation to legal liability, is social responsibility. The evolution of views on the nature of legal liability has resulted in the emergence of the concept of positive legal liability. The initial methodological premise of the research of legal liability is to address to the issue of social responsibility, since the general characteristics and forms of realization inherent in social responsibility, inevitably find their expression both: in legal responsibility and its individual types. Traditionally, legal liability is limited by its interpretation as liability for the past, i.e. negative liability. At the same time, attention is drawn to the diversity of views and interpretations of supporters of this approach. However, in recent decades, there has been a growing body of research on positive (prospective) responsibility, whose proponents are also diverse. Moreover, in science it is suggested, that responsibility can be extremely positive, along with which, the protection of violated subjective rights and interests protected by law, is provided by measures of state coercion. http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/acj.v4i85.4015 Legal liability is considered in the article as an holistic phenomenon, dialectical unity of responsibility for past actions (retrospective responsibility) and responsibility for present and future behavior (positive, prospective responsibility), which develops and is implemented in a voluntary or compulsory form in regulatory legal relations. Legal liability is characterized by a number of specific features. Among them: (1) legal liability is based on legal norms, that give it certainty and general compulsion; (2) state guarantee; (3) provision of state coercion or persuasion; (4) legal liability as a necessary consequence has the approval or conviction, encouragement or punishment; (5) legal liability is implemented in the procedural form, provided for by law; (6) essentially, legal liability is a uniform, but it is exercised in two different forms. The theories and concepts of legal liability, presented in the scientific literature were critically analyzed in the article and on this basis its concept is being formulated, the specific features inherent in legal liability are being identified, its unity and the presence of various forms of implementation are being alleged.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信