研究登记的结果测量:需要一致的方法

H. Forst, R. Paarlberg
{"title":"研究登记的结果测量:需要一致的方法","authors":"H. Forst, R. Paarlberg","doi":"10.1177/0092861512444030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The definition of outcome measures is the core part of a clinical study protocol and is also key information when posting the protocol and results information from a study on registries like https://doi.org/ClinicalTrials.gov . Unfortunately, there are some differences in terminology and language used in study protocols and study registries. At first glance, these discrepancies might not appear to be that important, but they have the potential to introduce critical inconsistencies. In this article, we give an overview of definitions and issues in this area, report about the harmonization efforts under the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) and Health Level Seven (HL7) initiatives, and provide a SMART principle to improve the definition for outcome measures. For clear communication and interpretation of the study information, we need a common language that harmonizes the terminology between the study protocol and the information posted on different study registries to avoid serious misunderstandings as well as wrong conclusions.","PeriodicalId":391574,"journal":{"name":"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome Measures in Study Registries: The Need for a Consistent Approach\",\"authors\":\"H. Forst, R. Paarlberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0092861512444030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The definition of outcome measures is the core part of a clinical study protocol and is also key information when posting the protocol and results information from a study on registries like https://doi.org/ClinicalTrials.gov . Unfortunately, there are some differences in terminology and language used in study protocols and study registries. At first glance, these discrepancies might not appear to be that important, but they have the potential to introduce critical inconsistencies. In this article, we give an overview of definitions and issues in this area, report about the harmonization efforts under the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) and Health Level Seven (HL7) initiatives, and provide a SMART principle to improve the definition for outcome measures. For clear communication and interpretation of the study information, we need a common language that harmonizes the terminology between the study protocol and the information posted on different study registries to avoid serious misunderstandings as well as wrong conclusions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":391574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0092861512444030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0092861512444030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结果测量的定义是临床研究方案的核心部分,也是在https://doi.org/ClinicalTrials.gov等注册中心发布研究方案和结果信息时的关键信息。不幸的是,在研究方案和研究注册中使用的术语和语言存在一些差异。乍一看,这些差异似乎不那么重要,但它们有可能导致严重的不一致。在本文中,我们概述了该领域的定义和问题,报告了临床数据交换标准联盟(CDISC)和健康级别7 (HL7)倡议下的协调工作,并提供了一个SMART原则来改进结果测量的定义。为了清晰地沟通和解释研究信息,我们需要一种共同的语言来协调研究方案和发布在不同研究注册中心的信息之间的术语,以避免严重的误解和错误的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcome Measures in Study Registries: The Need for a Consistent Approach
The definition of outcome measures is the core part of a clinical study protocol and is also key information when posting the protocol and results information from a study on registries like https://doi.org/ClinicalTrials.gov . Unfortunately, there are some differences in terminology and language used in study protocols and study registries. At first glance, these discrepancies might not appear to be that important, but they have the potential to introduce critical inconsistencies. In this article, we give an overview of definitions and issues in this area, report about the harmonization efforts under the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) and Health Level Seven (HL7) initiatives, and provide a SMART principle to improve the definition for outcome measures. For clear communication and interpretation of the study information, we need a common language that harmonizes the terminology between the study protocol and the information posted on different study registries to avoid serious misunderstandings as well as wrong conclusions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信