预加热树脂复合材料与树脂水泥在间接二硅酸锂上的抗剪强度对比

Hafisza Syalsyabila Maghfira, Rahmat Hidayat, Rizki Amalina
{"title":"预加热树脂复合材料与树脂水泥在间接二硅酸锂上的抗剪强度对比","authors":"Hafisza Syalsyabila Maghfira, Rahmat Hidayat, Rizki Amalina","doi":"10.30659/medali.4.2.110-118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The success of fixed dentures is influenced by the cementation procedure. Resin cement is the most commonly used luting materials. In addition to resin cement, there are other types of luting materials, preheated resin composite. Preheating resin composite allow the material to have a low level of viscosity, therefore can be used as luting material. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the comparison of the shear strength cementation of preheated resin composite and resin cement on indirect lithium disilicate. Method: This study is experimental laboratory with post test only control group design. The sample in this study are 12 pieces lithium disilicate with diameter 5.5 mm x 3 mm cemented divided into three groups based on types of luting materials (preheated resin composite microhybrid, preheated nanohybrid, and resin cement). After the cementation procedure, the samples were immersed in artificial saliva at 37ºC for 24 hours. The shear strength test was carried out with a universal testing machine. Data analysis with using One Way ANOVA. Result: The results of the average shear strength of each group were 11.98 MPa for preheated microhybrid, 11.41 MPa for preheated nanohybrid, and 14.22 MPa for resin cement. The results of the One Way ANOVA test showed that there was a significant differences between groups (p value 0.000). Conclusion: There was a significant difference in shear strength between preheated microhybrid, preheated nanohybrid, and resin cement. The highest shear strength was the resin cement group.","PeriodicalId":156596,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Medali","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON OF SHEAR STRENGTH CEMENTATION OF PREHEATED RESIN COMPOSITE AND RESIN CEMENT ON INDIRECT LITHIUM DISILICATE\",\"authors\":\"Hafisza Syalsyabila Maghfira, Rahmat Hidayat, Rizki Amalina\",\"doi\":\"10.30659/medali.4.2.110-118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The success of fixed dentures is influenced by the cementation procedure. Resin cement is the most commonly used luting materials. In addition to resin cement, there are other types of luting materials, preheated resin composite. Preheating resin composite allow the material to have a low level of viscosity, therefore can be used as luting material. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the comparison of the shear strength cementation of preheated resin composite and resin cement on indirect lithium disilicate. Method: This study is experimental laboratory with post test only control group design. The sample in this study are 12 pieces lithium disilicate with diameter 5.5 mm x 3 mm cemented divided into three groups based on types of luting materials (preheated resin composite microhybrid, preheated nanohybrid, and resin cement). After the cementation procedure, the samples were immersed in artificial saliva at 37ºC for 24 hours. The shear strength test was carried out with a universal testing machine. Data analysis with using One Way ANOVA. Result: The results of the average shear strength of each group were 11.98 MPa for preheated microhybrid, 11.41 MPa for preheated nanohybrid, and 14.22 MPa for resin cement. The results of the One Way ANOVA test showed that there was a significant differences between groups (p value 0.000). Conclusion: There was a significant difference in shear strength between preheated microhybrid, preheated nanohybrid, and resin cement. The highest shear strength was the resin cement group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":156596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Medali\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Medali\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30659/medali.4.2.110-118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Medali","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/medali.4.2.110-118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:固定义齿的成功与否与固相过程有关。树脂水泥是最常用的粘结材料。除树脂水泥外,还有其他类型的胶凝材料,预热树脂复合。预热树脂复合可以使材料具有较低的粘度水平,因此可以用作润滑材料。本研究的目的是比较预加热树脂复合材料和树脂水泥在间接二硅酸锂上的抗剪强度。方法:本研究采用单纯后测对照组设计。本研究的样品是直径5.5 mm x 3mm的12块二硅酸锂胶结材料,根据胶结材料的类型(预热树脂复合微杂化、预热纳米杂化和树脂水泥)分为三组。胶结后,将样品在37℃的人工唾液中浸泡24小时。用万能试验机进行了抗剪强度试验。数据分析采用单因素方差分析。结果:各组平均抗剪强度分别为:预热微混合料11.98 MPa、预热纳米混合料11.41 MPa、树脂水泥14.22 MPa。单因素方差分析(One Way ANOVA)结果显示,组间差异显著(p值0.000)。结论:预加热微杂化材料、预加热纳米杂化材料和树脂水泥的抗剪强度存在显著差异。抗剪强度最高的是树脂水泥组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COMPARISON OF SHEAR STRENGTH CEMENTATION OF PREHEATED RESIN COMPOSITE AND RESIN CEMENT ON INDIRECT LITHIUM DISILICATE
Background: The success of fixed dentures is influenced by the cementation procedure. Resin cement is the most commonly used luting materials. In addition to resin cement, there are other types of luting materials, preheated resin composite. Preheating resin composite allow the material to have a low level of viscosity, therefore can be used as luting material. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the comparison of the shear strength cementation of preheated resin composite and resin cement on indirect lithium disilicate. Method: This study is experimental laboratory with post test only control group design. The sample in this study are 12 pieces lithium disilicate with diameter 5.5 mm x 3 mm cemented divided into three groups based on types of luting materials (preheated resin composite microhybrid, preheated nanohybrid, and resin cement). After the cementation procedure, the samples were immersed in artificial saliva at 37ºC for 24 hours. The shear strength test was carried out with a universal testing machine. Data analysis with using One Way ANOVA. Result: The results of the average shear strength of each group were 11.98 MPa for preheated microhybrid, 11.41 MPa for preheated nanohybrid, and 14.22 MPa for resin cement. The results of the One Way ANOVA test showed that there was a significant differences between groups (p value 0.000). Conclusion: There was a significant difference in shear strength between preheated microhybrid, preheated nanohybrid, and resin cement. The highest shear strength was the resin cement group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信