安大略省的收入条件融资计划

B. Alarie, D. Duff
{"title":"安大略省的收入条件融资计划","authors":"B. Alarie, D. Duff","doi":"10.3138/9781442680333-030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the positive externalities associated with higher education favour substantial government support, sound arguments also favour student contributions to the costs of post-secondary education, based on both the private benefits obtained and the regressive impact of general subsidies for higher education. At the same time, the central role that higher education performs as a vehicle for social mobility and the general reluctance of private lenders to finance individual investments in higher education suggest that governments also have an important role to play in the area of student assistance - ensuring that higher education is accessible to all students on the basis of merit, irrespective of financial ability. The need for a well-designed student assistance program is more important than ever. Among many proposals for a restructured student aid system, one of the most promising is to replace existing 'mortgage-style' student loads with a financing arrangement involving repayment obligations that depend on the student's income after graduation. To the extent that this 'income-contingent' approach reduces the risk to borrowers with respect to their investments in higher education, it will likely lessen the reluctance that students exhibit with respect to such borrowing. Moreover, where funding covers both the direct costs of higher education as well as living expenses, income-contingent financing programs may enhance accessibility by making higher education effectively free at the point of purchase - offsetting the 'sticker shock' associated with increased tuition fees as well as living costs which generally exceed the direct costs of higher education. Finally, collection through the income tax should reduce the incidence of nonpayment and dramatically lessen the costs of administering student financial aid. This paper proposes an income-contingent financing program (ICFP) for Ontario to replace the current system of mortgage-style loans, automatic debt remission, and interest and debt relief available under the Ontario Student Assistance Program. Part 1 reviews the current system of government-provided student aid in Ontario, providing an essential foundation for our subsequent proposal for an ICFP. Part 2 examines the experience with ICFPs in Australia, New Zealand, Sweden, and the UK, in order to derive lessons relevant to the design of an ICFP for Ontario. Part 3 considers the essential features of an ICFP, canvassing the competing arguments and making specific recommendations informed by our review of the current system in Ontario and the international experience with ICFPs.","PeriodicalId":243835,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Law eJournal","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Income-Contingent Financing Program for Ontario\",\"authors\":\"B. Alarie, D. Duff\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/9781442680333-030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although the positive externalities associated with higher education favour substantial government support, sound arguments also favour student contributions to the costs of post-secondary education, based on both the private benefits obtained and the regressive impact of general subsidies for higher education. At the same time, the central role that higher education performs as a vehicle for social mobility and the general reluctance of private lenders to finance individual investments in higher education suggest that governments also have an important role to play in the area of student assistance - ensuring that higher education is accessible to all students on the basis of merit, irrespective of financial ability. The need for a well-designed student assistance program is more important than ever. Among many proposals for a restructured student aid system, one of the most promising is to replace existing 'mortgage-style' student loads with a financing arrangement involving repayment obligations that depend on the student's income after graduation. To the extent that this 'income-contingent' approach reduces the risk to borrowers with respect to their investments in higher education, it will likely lessen the reluctance that students exhibit with respect to such borrowing. Moreover, where funding covers both the direct costs of higher education as well as living expenses, income-contingent financing programs may enhance accessibility by making higher education effectively free at the point of purchase - offsetting the 'sticker shock' associated with increased tuition fees as well as living costs which generally exceed the direct costs of higher education. Finally, collection through the income tax should reduce the incidence of nonpayment and dramatically lessen the costs of administering student financial aid. This paper proposes an income-contingent financing program (ICFP) for Ontario to replace the current system of mortgage-style loans, automatic debt remission, and interest and debt relief available under the Ontario Student Assistance Program. Part 1 reviews the current system of government-provided student aid in Ontario, providing an essential foundation for our subsequent proposal for an ICFP. Part 2 examines the experience with ICFPs in Australia, New Zealand, Sweden, and the UK, in order to derive lessons relevant to the design of an ICFP for Ontario. Part 3 considers the essential features of an ICFP, canvassing the competing arguments and making specific recommendations informed by our review of the current system in Ontario and the international experience with ICFPs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442680333-030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442680333-030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

尽管与高等教育相关的积极外部性有利于政府的大力支持,但基于获得的私人利益和对高等教育的一般补贴的倒退影响,合理的论点也有利于学生对高等教育成本的贡献。与此同时,高等教育作为社会流动工具的核心作用,以及私人贷款机构普遍不愿为高等教育的个人投资提供资金,这表明政府在学生援助领域也可以发挥重要作用——确保所有学生都能根据成绩接受高等教育,而不管经济能力如何。对精心设计的学生援助计划的需求比以往任何时候都更加重要。在重组学生援助体系的众多建议中,最有希望的一项是用一种融资安排来取代现有的“抵押贷款式”学生负担,这种安排包括根据学生毕业后的收入来偿还债务。从某种程度上说,这种“视收入而定”的方法降低了借款人在高等教育投资方面的风险,它可能会减少学生对这种借贷表现出的不情愿。此外,如果资金既涵盖了高等教育的直接成本,也涵盖了生活费用,则收入条件融资计划可以通过使高等教育在购买时有效免费来提高可及性,从而抵消与学费增加相关的“价目表冲击”,以及通常超过高等教育直接成本的生活成本。最后,通过征收个人所得税可以减少拖欠的情况,并大大降低管理学生经济援助的成本。本文提出了安大略省的收入条件融资计划(ICFP),以取代目前的抵押贷款式贷款,自动债务减免以及安大略省学生援助计划下的利息和债务减免制度。第1部分回顾了安大略省政府提供的学生援助的现行制度,为我们后续的ICFP提案提供了必要的基础。第2部分考察了澳大利亚、新西兰、瑞典和英国在ICFP方面的经验,以便得出与安大略省ICFP设计相关的教训。第3部分考虑了国际政策方案的基本特征,通过对安大略省现行制度和国际政策方案的国际经验的审查,仔细研究了相互竞争的论点,并提出了具体建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Income-Contingent Financing Program for Ontario
Although the positive externalities associated with higher education favour substantial government support, sound arguments also favour student contributions to the costs of post-secondary education, based on both the private benefits obtained and the regressive impact of general subsidies for higher education. At the same time, the central role that higher education performs as a vehicle for social mobility and the general reluctance of private lenders to finance individual investments in higher education suggest that governments also have an important role to play in the area of student assistance - ensuring that higher education is accessible to all students on the basis of merit, irrespective of financial ability. The need for a well-designed student assistance program is more important than ever. Among many proposals for a restructured student aid system, one of the most promising is to replace existing 'mortgage-style' student loads with a financing arrangement involving repayment obligations that depend on the student's income after graduation. To the extent that this 'income-contingent' approach reduces the risk to borrowers with respect to their investments in higher education, it will likely lessen the reluctance that students exhibit with respect to such borrowing. Moreover, where funding covers both the direct costs of higher education as well as living expenses, income-contingent financing programs may enhance accessibility by making higher education effectively free at the point of purchase - offsetting the 'sticker shock' associated with increased tuition fees as well as living costs which generally exceed the direct costs of higher education. Finally, collection through the income tax should reduce the incidence of nonpayment and dramatically lessen the costs of administering student financial aid. This paper proposes an income-contingent financing program (ICFP) for Ontario to replace the current system of mortgage-style loans, automatic debt remission, and interest and debt relief available under the Ontario Student Assistance Program. Part 1 reviews the current system of government-provided student aid in Ontario, providing an essential foundation for our subsequent proposal for an ICFP. Part 2 examines the experience with ICFPs in Australia, New Zealand, Sweden, and the UK, in order to derive lessons relevant to the design of an ICFP for Ontario. Part 3 considers the essential features of an ICFP, canvassing the competing arguments and making specific recommendations informed by our review of the current system in Ontario and the international experience with ICFPs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信