政治制度的作用是什么?

C. Cordelli
{"title":"政治制度的作用是什么?","authors":"C. Cordelli","doi":"10.23943/PRINCETON/9780691205755.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter rejects the widespread idea that political institutions and private modes of action are ultimately interchangeable means for the pursuit of the independently defined goal of justice. It defends the view that political institutions, including a democratic system of law, are constitutive of justice, rather than merely instrumental to it. It also discusses how claims of justice can be defined and enforced through political institutions in a way that respects both the fundamental status of persons as equal normative authorities and their independence. The chapter opens the possibility that justice is fully compatible with a highly privatized system of governance against the background of a political authority that retains functions of lawmaking and adjudication. It emphasizes the privatization of governance that compromise the very reasons why support authoritative political institutions should be brought about even in the presence of an established public authority.","PeriodicalId":122906,"journal":{"name":"The Privatized State","volume":"9 12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Are Political Institutions For?\",\"authors\":\"C. Cordelli\",\"doi\":\"10.23943/PRINCETON/9780691205755.003.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter rejects the widespread idea that political institutions and private modes of action are ultimately interchangeable means for the pursuit of the independently defined goal of justice. It defends the view that political institutions, including a democratic system of law, are constitutive of justice, rather than merely instrumental to it. It also discusses how claims of justice can be defined and enforced through political institutions in a way that respects both the fundamental status of persons as equal normative authorities and their independence. The chapter opens the possibility that justice is fully compatible with a highly privatized system of governance against the background of a political authority that retains functions of lawmaking and adjudication. It emphasizes the privatization of governance that compromise the very reasons why support authoritative political institutions should be brought about even in the presence of an established public authority.\",\"PeriodicalId\":122906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Privatized State\",\"volume\":\"9 12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Privatized State\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23943/PRINCETON/9780691205755.003.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Privatized State","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23943/PRINCETON/9780691205755.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这一章反对一种普遍的观点,即政治制度和私人行动模式最终是追求独立定义的正义目标的可互换手段。它捍卫的观点是,包括民主法律制度在内的政治制度是正义的组成部分,而不仅仅是正义的工具。它还讨论了如何通过政治机构界定和执行正义的要求,同时尊重个人作为平等规范当局的基本地位及其独立性。本章揭示了一种可能性,即在保留立法和裁决职能的政治权威的背景下,司法与高度私有化的治理制度完全相容。它强调治理的私营化,这种私营化损害了为什么即使在一个既定的公共权威存在的情况下也应该支持权威的政治机构的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What Are Political Institutions For?
This chapter rejects the widespread idea that political institutions and private modes of action are ultimately interchangeable means for the pursuit of the independently defined goal of justice. It defends the view that political institutions, including a democratic system of law, are constitutive of justice, rather than merely instrumental to it. It also discusses how claims of justice can be defined and enforced through political institutions in a way that respects both the fundamental status of persons as equal normative authorities and their independence. The chapter opens the possibility that justice is fully compatible with a highly privatized system of governance against the background of a political authority that retains functions of lawmaking and adjudication. It emphasizes the privatization of governance that compromise the very reasons why support authoritative political institutions should be brought about even in the presence of an established public authority.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信