在Apache Storm上通过聚类和排名发现有影响力的Twitter作者

Christina Saravanos, G. Drakopoulos, Andreas Kanavos, E. Kafeza, C. Makris
{"title":"在Apache Storm上通过聚类和排名发现有影响力的Twitter作者","authors":"Christina Saravanos, G. Drakopoulos, Andreas Kanavos, E. Kafeza, C. Makris","doi":"10.1109/IISA52424.2021.9555528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays several millions of people are throughout the day active, while hundreds of new accounts are created daily on social media. Thousands of short-length posts or tweets are posted on Twitter, a popular micro-blogging platform by a vast variety of authors and thus creating a widely diverse social content. The emerged diversity not only does indicate a remarkable strength, but also reveals a certain kind of difficulty when attempting to find Twitter’s authoritative and influencing authors. This work introduces a two-step algorithmic approach for discovering these authors. A set of metrics and features are, firstly, extracted from the social network e.g. friends and followers and the content of the tweets written by the author are extracted. Then, Twitter’s most authoritative authors are discovered by employing two distinct approaches, one which relies on probabilistic while the other applies fuzzy clustering. In particular, the former, initially, employs the Gaussian Mixture Model to identify the most authoritative authors and then introduces a novel ranking technique which relies on computing the cumulative Gaussian distribution of the extracted metrics and features. On the other hand, the latter combines the Gaussian Mixture Model with fuzzy c-means and subsequently the derived authors are ranked via the Borda count technique. The results indicate that the second scheme was able to find more authoritative authors in the benchmark dataset. Both approaches were designed, implemented, and executed on a local cluster of the Apache Storm framework, a cloud-based platform which supports streaming data and real-time scenarios.","PeriodicalId":437496,"journal":{"name":"2021 12th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discovering Influential Twitter Authors Via Clustering And Ranking On Apache Storm\",\"authors\":\"Christina Saravanos, G. Drakopoulos, Andreas Kanavos, E. Kafeza, C. Makris\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IISA52424.2021.9555528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nowadays several millions of people are throughout the day active, while hundreds of new accounts are created daily on social media. Thousands of short-length posts or tweets are posted on Twitter, a popular micro-blogging platform by a vast variety of authors and thus creating a widely diverse social content. The emerged diversity not only does indicate a remarkable strength, but also reveals a certain kind of difficulty when attempting to find Twitter’s authoritative and influencing authors. This work introduces a two-step algorithmic approach for discovering these authors. A set of metrics and features are, firstly, extracted from the social network e.g. friends and followers and the content of the tweets written by the author are extracted. Then, Twitter’s most authoritative authors are discovered by employing two distinct approaches, one which relies on probabilistic while the other applies fuzzy clustering. In particular, the former, initially, employs the Gaussian Mixture Model to identify the most authoritative authors and then introduces a novel ranking technique which relies on computing the cumulative Gaussian distribution of the extracted metrics and features. On the other hand, the latter combines the Gaussian Mixture Model with fuzzy c-means and subsequently the derived authors are ranked via the Borda count technique. The results indicate that the second scheme was able to find more authoritative authors in the benchmark dataset. Both approaches were designed, implemented, and executed on a local cluster of the Apache Storm framework, a cloud-based platform which supports streaming data and real-time scenarios.\",\"PeriodicalId\":437496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 12th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 12th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IISA52424.2021.9555528\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 12th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IISA52424.2021.9555528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,每天都有数百万人活跃在社交媒体上,同时每天都有数百个新账户被创建。在Twitter这个流行的微博平台上,成千上万的短文或推文由各种各样的作者发布,从而创造了广泛多样的社交内容。这种多样性的出现不仅表明了一种显著的力量,也揭示了在试图寻找Twitter的权威和影响力的作者时的某种困难。这项工作介绍了发现这些作者的两步算法方法。首先,从社交网络中提取一组指标和特征,例如朋友和追随者,并提取作者所写的推文内容。然后,通过采用两种不同的方法发现Twitter最权威的作者,一种依赖于概率,另一种应用模糊聚类。其中,前者首先采用高斯混合模型来识别最权威的作者,然后引入了一种新的排名技术,该技术依赖于计算提取的度量和特征的累积高斯分布。另一方面,后者将高斯混合模型与模糊c均值相结合,随后通过Borda计数技术对导出的作者进行排名。结果表明,第二种方案能够在基准数据集中找到更多的权威作者。这两种方法都是在Apache Storm框架的本地集群上设计、实现和执行的,这是一个基于云的平台,支持流数据和实时场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discovering Influential Twitter Authors Via Clustering And Ranking On Apache Storm
Nowadays several millions of people are throughout the day active, while hundreds of new accounts are created daily on social media. Thousands of short-length posts or tweets are posted on Twitter, a popular micro-blogging platform by a vast variety of authors and thus creating a widely diverse social content. The emerged diversity not only does indicate a remarkable strength, but also reveals a certain kind of difficulty when attempting to find Twitter’s authoritative and influencing authors. This work introduces a two-step algorithmic approach for discovering these authors. A set of metrics and features are, firstly, extracted from the social network e.g. friends and followers and the content of the tweets written by the author are extracted. Then, Twitter’s most authoritative authors are discovered by employing two distinct approaches, one which relies on probabilistic while the other applies fuzzy clustering. In particular, the former, initially, employs the Gaussian Mixture Model to identify the most authoritative authors and then introduces a novel ranking technique which relies on computing the cumulative Gaussian distribution of the extracted metrics and features. On the other hand, the latter combines the Gaussian Mixture Model with fuzzy c-means and subsequently the derived authors are ranked via the Borda count technique. The results indicate that the second scheme was able to find more authoritative authors in the benchmark dataset. Both approaches were designed, implemented, and executed on a local cluster of the Apache Storm framework, a cloud-based platform which supports streaming data and real-time scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信