低功率摆式波能转换器的最优MPPT策略

M. Carandell, D. Toma, J. Río, M. Gasulla
{"title":"低功率摆式波能转换器的最优MPPT策略","authors":"M. Carandell, D. Toma, J. Río, M. Gasulla","doi":"10.1109/SENSORS47125.2020.9278610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) techniques for low-power pendulum-type Wave Energy Converters were evaluated. A Kinetic Energy Harvester previously designed, together with a Power Management Unit, were tested on a linear shaker to compare three MPPT techniques, the Constant Voltage versus two variants of the Fractional Open Circuit Voltage (FOCV). Results show a 25% improvement on the scavenged energy with one of the proposed FOCV techniques with respect to the other ones.","PeriodicalId":338240,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Sensors","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimum MPPT Strategy for Low-Power Pendulum-Type Wave Energy Converters\",\"authors\":\"M. Carandell, D. Toma, J. Río, M. Gasulla\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SENSORS47125.2020.9278610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) techniques for low-power pendulum-type Wave Energy Converters were evaluated. A Kinetic Energy Harvester previously designed, together with a Power Management Unit, were tested on a linear shaker to compare three MPPT techniques, the Constant Voltage versus two variants of the Fractional Open Circuit Voltage (FOCV). Results show a 25% improvement on the scavenged energy with one of the proposed FOCV techniques with respect to the other ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE Sensors\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE Sensors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SENSORS47125.2020.9278610\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Sensors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SENSORS47125.2020.9278610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

对低功率摆式波能转换器的最大功率点跟踪技术进行了评价。在线性激振器上测试了先前设计的动能收集器和电源管理单元,以比较三种MPPT技术,即恒定电压和两种分数开路电压(FOCV)。结果表明,其中一种FOCV技术的扫能比其他技术提高了25%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimum MPPT Strategy for Low-Power Pendulum-Type Wave Energy Converters
Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) techniques for low-power pendulum-type Wave Energy Converters were evaluated. A Kinetic Energy Harvester previously designed, together with a Power Management Unit, were tested on a linear shaker to compare three MPPT techniques, the Constant Voltage versus two variants of the Fractional Open Circuit Voltage (FOCV). Results show a 25% improvement on the scavenged energy with one of the proposed FOCV techniques with respect to the other ones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信