真蒂利的政治理论和法理学:从维多利亚到格劳秀斯的“神学”和“人文主义”观点之间的大辩论

D. Panizza
{"title":"真蒂利的政治理论和法理学:从维多利亚到格劳秀斯的“神学”和“人文主义”观点之间的大辩论","authors":"D. Panizza","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.871754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary: 1) Introduction; 2) War as duel vs. war as execution of justice; 3) Bilateral justice of war vs. invincible ignorance; 4) Pre-emptive self-defence vs. necessary self-defence; 5) The making of peace: restitution-punishment vs. conquest-empire; 6) Civilization vs. barbarism and the common law of mankind; and 7) Conclusion.","PeriodicalId":431450,"journal":{"name":"Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political Theory and Jurisprudence in Gentili's De Iure Belli: The Great Debate between 'Theological' and 'Humanist' Perspectives from Vitoria to Grotius\",\"authors\":\"D. Panizza\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.871754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary: 1) Introduction; 2) War as duel vs. war as execution of justice; 3) Bilateral justice of war vs. invincible ignorance; 4) Pre-emptive self-defence vs. necessary self-defence; 5) The making of peace: restitution-punishment vs. conquest-empire; 6) Civilization vs. barbarism and the common law of mankind; and 7) Conclusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.871754\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.871754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

摘要:1)引言;2)作为决斗的战争与作为正义执行的战争;3)战争的双边正义vs.不可战胜的无知;4)先发制人的自卫与必要的自卫;5)和平的建立:恢复-惩罚vs.征服-帝国;6)文明与野蛮与人类的共同法则;7)结束语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Political Theory and Jurisprudence in Gentili's De Iure Belli: The Great Debate between 'Theological' and 'Humanist' Perspectives from Vitoria to Grotius
Summary: 1) Introduction; 2) War as duel vs. war as execution of justice; 3) Bilateral justice of war vs. invincible ignorance; 4) Pre-emptive self-defence vs. necessary self-defence; 5) The making of peace: restitution-punishment vs. conquest-empire; 6) Civilization vs. barbarism and the common law of mankind; and 7) Conclusion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信