{"title":"为逻辑综合编写高效的硬件描述","authors":"L.G. Clonts, D. Bouldin","doi":"10.1109/SECON.1992.202402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several advantages for using a hardware description language for logic synthesis are given along with some example programs. Variations in writing style are shown to have a significant effect on the optimization process used by the synthesizer since one style generally results in a physical layout that consumes only half that of another. Based on these experiences, a structured, object-oriented style that separates control and operations is recommended for the writing of area-efficient hardware descriptions.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":230446,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings IEEE Southeastcon '92","volume":"25 19","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Writing area-efficient hardware descriptions for logic synthesis\",\"authors\":\"L.G. Clonts, D. Bouldin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SECON.1992.202402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several advantages for using a hardware description language for logic synthesis are given along with some example programs. Variations in writing style are shown to have a significant effect on the optimization process used by the synthesizer since one style generally results in a physical layout that consumes only half that of another. Based on these experiences, a structured, object-oriented style that separates control and operations is recommended for the writing of area-efficient hardware descriptions.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":230446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings IEEE Southeastcon '92\",\"volume\":\"25 19\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings IEEE Southeastcon '92\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SECON.1992.202402\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings IEEE Southeastcon '92","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SECON.1992.202402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Writing area-efficient hardware descriptions for logic synthesis
Several advantages for using a hardware description language for logic synthesis are given along with some example programs. Variations in writing style are shown to have a significant effect on the optimization process used by the synthesizer since one style generally results in a physical layout that consumes only half that of another. Based on these experiences, a structured, object-oriented style that separates control and operations is recommended for the writing of area-efficient hardware descriptions.<>