福柯的自由主义、新自由主义与真实政权谱系

Daniel Luis Cidade Gonçalves
{"title":"福柯的自由主义、新自由主义与真实政权谱系","authors":"Daniel Luis Cidade Gonçalves","doi":"10.18012/arf.v8i2.59388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EnglishThis paper aims to present the main ideas of Foucault presented in his course taught in 1979 at the College de France, entitled The birth of biopolitics. In second place, two antagonistic analyzes of two renowned intellectuals will be examined, namely, The last lesson of Foucault by Geoffroy de Lagasnerie and Y at-il one sujet biopolitique by Frederic Gros. From here, it will be necessary to understand a number of concepts, such as Foucault's rejection of the universals, the genealogy of schemes of veridiction, the logic of strategy and the diagnosis of politics, so that we can understand how, from a single work, it is possible to elaborate two very different analyzes, with such incompatible conclusions. Finally, we seek to elucidate how an understanding of the work from a broader reading, makes it possible to solve the main conflicts brought by the authors. However, we will show that Gros's analysis is more consistent with Foucault's thinking. portuguesEste trabalho tem como objetivo expor as principais ideias de Foucault apresentadas em seu curso ministrado em 1979 no College de France, intitulado O nascimento da biopolitica. Em seguida, duas analises antagonicas de dois renomados intelectuais serao analisadas, a saber, A ultima licao de Foucault de Geoffroy de Lagasnerie e Y a-t-il um sujet biopolitique de Frederic Gros. A partir dai sera necessario compreender uma serie de conceitos, como a recusa foucaultiana dos universais, a genealogia dos regimes veridicionais, a logica da estrategia e o diagnostico da politica, para que possamos entender como, a partir de uma unica obra, e possivel a elaboracao de duas analises tao distintas, com conclusoes tao incompativeis. Por ultimo, buscamos elucidar como uma compreensao da obra a partir de uma leitura mais ampla, e possivel resolver os principais conflitos colocados pelos autores. Mostraremos, por sua vez, que a analise de Gros e mais consistente com o pensamento de Foucault.","PeriodicalId":126658,"journal":{"name":"Aufklärung journal of philosophy","volume":"49 14","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liberalismo, neoliberalismo e a genealogia dos regimes veridicionais em Michel Foucault\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Luis Cidade Gonçalves\",\"doi\":\"10.18012/arf.v8i2.59388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"EnglishThis paper aims to present the main ideas of Foucault presented in his course taught in 1979 at the College de France, entitled The birth of biopolitics. In second place, two antagonistic analyzes of two renowned intellectuals will be examined, namely, The last lesson of Foucault by Geoffroy de Lagasnerie and Y at-il one sujet biopolitique by Frederic Gros. From here, it will be necessary to understand a number of concepts, such as Foucault's rejection of the universals, the genealogy of schemes of veridiction, the logic of strategy and the diagnosis of politics, so that we can understand how, from a single work, it is possible to elaborate two very different analyzes, with such incompatible conclusions. Finally, we seek to elucidate how an understanding of the work from a broader reading, makes it possible to solve the main conflicts brought by the authors. However, we will show that Gros's analysis is more consistent with Foucault's thinking. portuguesEste trabalho tem como objetivo expor as principais ideias de Foucault apresentadas em seu curso ministrado em 1979 no College de France, intitulado O nascimento da biopolitica. Em seguida, duas analises antagonicas de dois renomados intelectuais serao analisadas, a saber, A ultima licao de Foucault de Geoffroy de Lagasnerie e Y a-t-il um sujet biopolitique de Frederic Gros. A partir dai sera necessario compreender uma serie de conceitos, como a recusa foucaultiana dos universais, a genealogia dos regimes veridicionais, a logica da estrategia e o diagnostico da politica, para que possamos entender como, a partir de uma unica obra, e possivel a elaboracao de duas analises tao distintas, com conclusoes tao incompativeis. Por ultimo, buscamos elucidar como uma compreensao da obra a partir de uma leitura mais ampla, e possivel resolver os principais conflitos colocados pelos autores. Mostraremos, por sua vez, que a analise de Gros e mais consistente com o pensamento de Foucault.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aufklärung journal of philosophy\",\"volume\":\"49 14\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aufklärung journal of philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18012/arf.v8i2.59388\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aufklärung journal of philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18012/arf.v8i2.59388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在介绍福柯1979年在法兰西学院教授的课程《生命政治学的诞生》中提出的主要思想。其次,将考察两位著名知识分子的对立分析,即吉奥弗罗伊·德·拉加斯纳里的《福柯的最后一课》和弗雷德里克·格罗斯的《生命政治》。从这里开始,有必要理解一些概念,比如福柯对共相的拒绝,验证方案的谱系,策略的逻辑和政治的诊断,这样我们就可以理解,从一部作品中,如何有可能阐述两种截然不同的分析,得出如此不相容的结论。最后,我们试图阐明如何从更广泛的阅读理解作品,使解决作者带来的主要冲突成为可能。然而,我们将证明格罗斯的分析更符合福柯的思想。在1979年,在法国学院,在生命政治的基础上,对福柯的主要思想进行了研究。Em seguida, dua注意antagonicas de必须renomados intelectuais serao analisadas,军刀,天涯licao德福柯·德·费德Lagasnerie e Y存嗯我biopolitique de弗雷德里克·格罗斯。一个小组需要一个综合小组,一个小组需要一个综合小组,一个小组需要一个综合小组,一个小组需要一个综合小组,一个小组需要一个综合小组,一个小组需要一个综合小组,一个小组需要一个综合小组,一个小组需要一个综合小组,一个小组需要一个综合小组,一个小组需要一个综合小组,一个小组需要一个综合小组,一个小组需要一个综合小组,一个小组需要一个综合小组,一个小组需要一个综合小组,一个小组需要一个综合小组,一个小组需要一个综合小组,一个小组需要一个综合小组,一个小组需要一个综合小组,一个小组需要一个综合小组,一个小组需要一个综合小组。最后,公共交通系统阐明了公共交通系统的综合性,同时也阐明了公共交通系统的复杂性,以及公共交通系统的复杂性,这是解决公共交通系统与公共交通系统之间主要冲突的可能方法。最重要的是,可怜的可怜的人,正如格洛斯的分析,他对福柯的看法是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Liberalismo, neoliberalismo e a genealogia dos regimes veridicionais em Michel Foucault
EnglishThis paper aims to present the main ideas of Foucault presented in his course taught in 1979 at the College de France, entitled The birth of biopolitics. In second place, two antagonistic analyzes of two renowned intellectuals will be examined, namely, The last lesson of Foucault by Geoffroy de Lagasnerie and Y at-il one sujet biopolitique by Frederic Gros. From here, it will be necessary to understand a number of concepts, such as Foucault's rejection of the universals, the genealogy of schemes of veridiction, the logic of strategy and the diagnosis of politics, so that we can understand how, from a single work, it is possible to elaborate two very different analyzes, with such incompatible conclusions. Finally, we seek to elucidate how an understanding of the work from a broader reading, makes it possible to solve the main conflicts brought by the authors. However, we will show that Gros's analysis is more consistent with Foucault's thinking. portuguesEste trabalho tem como objetivo expor as principais ideias de Foucault apresentadas em seu curso ministrado em 1979 no College de France, intitulado O nascimento da biopolitica. Em seguida, duas analises antagonicas de dois renomados intelectuais serao analisadas, a saber, A ultima licao de Foucault de Geoffroy de Lagasnerie e Y a-t-il um sujet biopolitique de Frederic Gros. A partir dai sera necessario compreender uma serie de conceitos, como a recusa foucaultiana dos universais, a genealogia dos regimes veridicionais, a logica da estrategia e o diagnostico da politica, para que possamos entender como, a partir de uma unica obra, e possivel a elaboracao de duas analises tao distintas, com conclusoes tao incompativeis. Por ultimo, buscamos elucidar como uma compreensao da obra a partir de uma leitura mais ampla, e possivel resolver os principais conflitos colocados pelos autores. Mostraremos, por sua vez, que a analise de Gros e mais consistente com o pensamento de Foucault.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信