种植体周围炎:外植体与种植体周围再生

Dumitru Gheorghiev, D. Sirbu, D. Sirbu, Dumitru Nuca, S. Strîșca, Stanislav Eni
{"title":"种植体周围炎:外植体与种植体周围再生","authors":"Dumitru Gheorghiev, D. Sirbu, D. Sirbu, Dumitru Nuca, S. Strîșca, Stanislav Eni","doi":"10.53530/1857-1328.21.59.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peri-implantitis is a complication in implantprosthetic rehabilitation that causes morpho-functional, masticatory and aesthetic disorders. Depending on the severity it can be approached by conservative surgical or radical treatment. The aim of the paper is the comparative analysis of conservative surgical methods (implant preservation) versus radical (explantation). We studied 2 patients who came to the SRL “Omni Dent” clinic with peri-implantitis. Manifestation, treatment and evolution in both patients were compared. Analysis criteria: bone defect extension, soft tissue appearance, tissue regeneration, implant-prosthetic rehabilitation time. In RI patient there were changes in color and appearance of the peri-implant soft tissues (hyperemia, edema, purulent discharge), peri-implant radiolucency on the entire implant surface; in the TM patient there were the same clinical signs but limited to ½ implant length. RI patient underwent explantation with re-implantation in the neighboring region 2.4 after 4 months with prosthesis fixing after another 4 months. Tissue regeneration evolved without complications. In TM patient was decided to keep the implant through curettage, implantoplasty and bone addition. Prosthetic rehabilitation followed later without complications. Timely addressing would prevent the development of complications with implant loss. The insignificant loss of peri-implant tissues can be recovered with the preservation of the implant, in the extended defects the optimal solution is the explantation with the subsequent implantprosthetic rehabilitation.","PeriodicalId":122574,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatological Medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peri-implantitis: explantation versus peri-implant regeneration\",\"authors\":\"Dumitru Gheorghiev, D. Sirbu, D. Sirbu, Dumitru Nuca, S. Strîșca, Stanislav Eni\",\"doi\":\"10.53530/1857-1328.21.59.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Peri-implantitis is a complication in implantprosthetic rehabilitation that causes morpho-functional, masticatory and aesthetic disorders. Depending on the severity it can be approached by conservative surgical or radical treatment. The aim of the paper is the comparative analysis of conservative surgical methods (implant preservation) versus radical (explantation). We studied 2 patients who came to the SRL “Omni Dent” clinic with peri-implantitis. Manifestation, treatment and evolution in both patients were compared. Analysis criteria: bone defect extension, soft tissue appearance, tissue regeneration, implant-prosthetic rehabilitation time. In RI patient there were changes in color and appearance of the peri-implant soft tissues (hyperemia, edema, purulent discharge), peri-implant radiolucency on the entire implant surface; in the TM patient there were the same clinical signs but limited to ½ implant length. RI patient underwent explantation with re-implantation in the neighboring region 2.4 after 4 months with prosthesis fixing after another 4 months. Tissue regeneration evolved without complications. In TM patient was decided to keep the implant through curettage, implantoplasty and bone addition. Prosthetic rehabilitation followed later without complications. Timely addressing would prevent the development of complications with implant loss. The insignificant loss of peri-implant tissues can be recovered with the preservation of the implant, in the extended defects the optimal solution is the explantation with the subsequent implantprosthetic rehabilitation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":122574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stomatological Medicine\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stomatological Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53530/1857-1328.21.59.06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53530/1857-1328.21.59.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

种植体周围炎是种植体康复中的一种并发症,可引起形态功能、咀嚼和审美障碍。根据严重程度,可以采取保守手术或根治性治疗。本文的目的是比较分析保守手术方法(种植体保存)和根治性手术方法(植入术)。我们研究了2例因种植体周围炎来到SRL“Omni Dent”诊所的患者。比较两例患者的表现、治疗及进展情况。分析标准:骨缺损延伸、软组织外观、组织再生、种植体-假体康复时间。RI患者种植体周围软组织的颜色和外观发生变化(充血、水肿、脓性分泌物),整个种植体表面的种植体周围放射率发生变化;TM患者有相同的临床症状,但限于1 / 2种植体长度。RI患者于4个月后行外植体及邻区再植入术,4个月后行假体固定。组织再生进化无并发症。TM患者通过刮除、种植体成形术和骨添加术决定保留种植体。随后进行假肢康复,无并发症。及时处理可以防止种植体丢失并发症的发生。种植体周围组织的轻微损失可以在保留种植体的情况下得到恢复,对于扩展缺陷的最佳解决方案是外植体与随后的种植体康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peri-implantitis: explantation versus peri-implant regeneration
Peri-implantitis is a complication in implantprosthetic rehabilitation that causes morpho-functional, masticatory and aesthetic disorders. Depending on the severity it can be approached by conservative surgical or radical treatment. The aim of the paper is the comparative analysis of conservative surgical methods (implant preservation) versus radical (explantation). We studied 2 patients who came to the SRL “Omni Dent” clinic with peri-implantitis. Manifestation, treatment and evolution in both patients were compared. Analysis criteria: bone defect extension, soft tissue appearance, tissue regeneration, implant-prosthetic rehabilitation time. In RI patient there were changes in color and appearance of the peri-implant soft tissues (hyperemia, edema, purulent discharge), peri-implant radiolucency on the entire implant surface; in the TM patient there were the same clinical signs but limited to ½ implant length. RI patient underwent explantation with re-implantation in the neighboring region 2.4 after 4 months with prosthesis fixing after another 4 months. Tissue regeneration evolved without complications. In TM patient was decided to keep the implant through curettage, implantoplasty and bone addition. Prosthetic rehabilitation followed later without complications. Timely addressing would prevent the development of complications with implant loss. The insignificant loss of peri-implant tissues can be recovered with the preservation of the implant, in the extended defects the optimal solution is the explantation with the subsequent implantprosthetic rehabilitation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信