绿色铁路线路选择的鹰鸽博弈研究

Guang-Zhao Zhou, Xiaoping Wu
{"title":"绿色铁路线路选择的鹰鸽博弈研究","authors":"Guang-Zhao Zhou, Xiaoping Wu","doi":"10.1504/IJADS.2017.10006716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we set asymmetric logical frames to simulate the collaborative process, and assume that the two given environmental factors are players. Given the equal strength of the players in the natural state, it is clear that the classical hawk-dove game model does not consider the strength of both sides. Hence, we continue to develop models based on the classical model, considering the effects of asymmetric interaction. Similarly, in model analysis, we introduce value engineering theory to simplify the model. The suitability of the model design is verified through computer simulations. Simulation graphics show that the probability of cooperation between two sides increases with the difference in strength between the two sides. In addition, the lower the unit value of conflict, the higher is the probability of cooperation. In this strategic direction, we can avoid the application and disoriented development of a wide variety of technology strategies.","PeriodicalId":216414,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Appl. Decis. Sci.","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hawk-dove game study on green railway alignment selection\",\"authors\":\"Guang-Zhao Zhou, Xiaoping Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJADS.2017.10006716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, we set asymmetric logical frames to simulate the collaborative process, and assume that the two given environmental factors are players. Given the equal strength of the players in the natural state, it is clear that the classical hawk-dove game model does not consider the strength of both sides. Hence, we continue to develop models based on the classical model, considering the effects of asymmetric interaction. Similarly, in model analysis, we introduce value engineering theory to simplify the model. The suitability of the model design is verified through computer simulations. Simulation graphics show that the probability of cooperation between two sides increases with the difference in strength between the two sides. In addition, the lower the unit value of conflict, the higher is the probability of cooperation. In this strategic direction, we can avoid the application and disoriented development of a wide variety of technology strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":216414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Appl. Decis. Sci.\",\"volume\":\"150 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Appl. Decis. Sci.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJADS.2017.10006716\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Appl. Decis. Sci.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJADS.2017.10006716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,我们设置了非对称的逻辑框架来模拟协作过程,并假设两个给定的环境因素是参与者。鉴于自然状态下参与者的实力相等,很明显,经典的鹰鸽博弈模型没有考虑双方的实力。因此,我们继续在经典模型的基础上发展模型,考虑不对称相互作用的影响。同样,在模型分析中,我们引入了价值工程理论来简化模型。通过计算机仿真验证了模型设计的适用性。仿真图形表明,双方合作的概率随着双方实力的差异而增加。此外,冲突的单位值越低,合作的概率越高。在这个战略方向上,我们可以避免各种各样的技术战略的应用和迷失方向的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hawk-dove game study on green railway alignment selection
In this study, we set asymmetric logical frames to simulate the collaborative process, and assume that the two given environmental factors are players. Given the equal strength of the players in the natural state, it is clear that the classical hawk-dove game model does not consider the strength of both sides. Hence, we continue to develop models based on the classical model, considering the effects of asymmetric interaction. Similarly, in model analysis, we introduce value engineering theory to simplify the model. The suitability of the model design is verified through computer simulations. Simulation graphics show that the probability of cooperation between two sides increases with the difference in strength between the two sides. In addition, the lower the unit value of conflict, the higher is the probability of cooperation. In this strategic direction, we can avoid the application and disoriented development of a wide variety of technology strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信