知识产权纠纷的可仲裁性

{"title":"知识产权纠纷的可仲裁性","authors":"","doi":"10.59126/v1i3a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intellectual Property Rights disputes are increasing at a gradual rate. Similarly, the means to use arbitration as a commercial dispute resolution mechanism is also increasing. Many liberalized and globalized countries in the world have adopted a pro-arbitration approach when it comes to arbitrability of IPR disputes. However, the judgments given by the Indian courts and their stance towards arbitration of IPR disputes have remained scattered. This paper navigates through the various judicial pronouncements set forth by the courts in India and identifies the dynamic nature of the same. It also recognizes lacuna present in the legislations and precedents regarding the scope of IPR arbitrability. Given the Indian judiciary's recent pro-arbitration stance, there is a strong probability that additional lawsuits originating from IPR agreements would be resolved through arbitration.","PeriodicalId":424180,"journal":{"name":"THE JOURNAL OF UNIQUE LAWS AND STUDENTS","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ARBITRABILITY OF IPR DISPUTES\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.59126/v1i3a1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Intellectual Property Rights disputes are increasing at a gradual rate. Similarly, the means to use arbitration as a commercial dispute resolution mechanism is also increasing. Many liberalized and globalized countries in the world have adopted a pro-arbitration approach when it comes to arbitrability of IPR disputes. However, the judgments given by the Indian courts and their stance towards arbitration of IPR disputes have remained scattered. This paper navigates through the various judicial pronouncements set forth by the courts in India and identifies the dynamic nature of the same. It also recognizes lacuna present in the legislations and precedents regarding the scope of IPR arbitrability. Given the Indian judiciary's recent pro-arbitration stance, there is a strong probability that additional lawsuits originating from IPR agreements would be resolved through arbitration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THE JOURNAL OF UNIQUE LAWS AND STUDENTS\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THE JOURNAL OF UNIQUE LAWS AND STUDENTS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59126/v1i3a1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE JOURNAL OF UNIQUE LAWS AND STUDENTS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59126/v1i3a1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

知识产权纠纷逐步增多。同样,利用仲裁作为商事纠纷解决机制的手段也在增加。世界上许多自由化、全球化的国家在知识产权争议的可仲裁性问题上都采取了亲仲裁的方式。然而,印度法院对知识产权纠纷仲裁的判决和立场仍然比较分散。本文通过印度法院提出的各种司法公告进行导航,并确定其动态性质。它还承认在知识产权可仲裁范围方面存在的立法和先例的空白。考虑到印度司法机构最近支持仲裁的立场,很有可能会有更多源自知识产权协议的诉讼通过仲裁解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ARBITRABILITY OF IPR DISPUTES
Intellectual Property Rights disputes are increasing at a gradual rate. Similarly, the means to use arbitration as a commercial dispute resolution mechanism is also increasing. Many liberalized and globalized countries in the world have adopted a pro-arbitration approach when it comes to arbitrability of IPR disputes. However, the judgments given by the Indian courts and their stance towards arbitration of IPR disputes have remained scattered. This paper navigates through the various judicial pronouncements set forth by the courts in India and identifies the dynamic nature of the same. It also recognizes lacuna present in the legislations and precedents regarding the scope of IPR arbitrability. Given the Indian judiciary's recent pro-arbitration stance, there is a strong probability that additional lawsuits originating from IPR agreements would be resolved through arbitration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信