海上自由通行:内陆发展中国家的双边过境和运输协定:利益和瓶颈——以印度和尼泊尔为例

Deepali Fernandes
{"title":"海上自由通行:内陆发展中国家的双边过境和运输协定:利益和瓶颈——以印度和尼泊尔为例","authors":"Deepali Fernandes","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3004789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mongolia and Nepal are both landlocked developing countries with very different economic, trade and development profiles. Despite their dissimilarities, as landlocked countries they face similar transport issues including high transport costs, arising from lack of direct access to the sea, physical distance and administrative burdens associated with double border crossings amongst others. \nThis paper analyses the trade and transport regimes of Mongolia and Nepal to understand common issues in the context of their relationship with key trade and transit partners. For instance while both countries have equal protection of the international legislative and normative frameworks, a key challenge is actualizing “free access to the sea”. \nBased on this analysis the paper seeks to set out policy recommendations for consideration from the trade, transit, trade facilitation and international regulatory framework perspective.","PeriodicalId":307125,"journal":{"name":"Institutional & Transition Economics Policy Paper Series","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Free Access to the Sea: Bilateral Transit and Transportation Agreements of LLDCs: Benefits and Bottlenecks-Case India and Nepal\",\"authors\":\"Deepali Fernandes\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3004789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mongolia and Nepal are both landlocked developing countries with very different economic, trade and development profiles. Despite their dissimilarities, as landlocked countries they face similar transport issues including high transport costs, arising from lack of direct access to the sea, physical distance and administrative burdens associated with double border crossings amongst others. \\nThis paper analyses the trade and transport regimes of Mongolia and Nepal to understand common issues in the context of their relationship with key trade and transit partners. For instance while both countries have equal protection of the international legislative and normative frameworks, a key challenge is actualizing “free access to the sea”. \\nBased on this analysis the paper seeks to set out policy recommendations for consideration from the trade, transit, trade facilitation and international regulatory framework perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":307125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Institutional & Transition Economics Policy Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Institutional & Transition Economics Policy Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3004789\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institutional & Transition Economics Policy Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3004789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

蒙古和尼泊尔都是内陆发展中国家,经济、贸易和发展状况非常不同。尽管它们有不同之处,但作为内陆国家,它们面临着类似的运输问题,包括由于缺乏直接入海口而产生的高运输成本、物理距离和与双重过境有关的行政负担等。本文分析了蒙古和尼泊尔的贸易和运输制度,以了解它们与主要贸易和过境伙伴关系背景下的共同问题。例如,虽然两国都受到国际立法和规范框架的平等保护,但一个关键的挑战是实现“自由进出海洋”。基于这一分析,本文试图从贸易、过境、贸易便利化和国际监管框架的角度提出政策建议供考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Free Access to the Sea: Bilateral Transit and Transportation Agreements of LLDCs: Benefits and Bottlenecks-Case India and Nepal
Mongolia and Nepal are both landlocked developing countries with very different economic, trade and development profiles. Despite their dissimilarities, as landlocked countries they face similar transport issues including high transport costs, arising from lack of direct access to the sea, physical distance and administrative burdens associated with double border crossings amongst others. This paper analyses the trade and transport regimes of Mongolia and Nepal to understand common issues in the context of their relationship with key trade and transit partners. For instance while both countries have equal protection of the international legislative and normative frameworks, a key challenge is actualizing “free access to the sea”. Based on this analysis the paper seeks to set out policy recommendations for consideration from the trade, transit, trade facilitation and international regulatory framework perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信