{"title":"乔治·弗雷德里克·福尔摩斯的亚里士多德主义","authors":"Colin D. Pearce","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1365356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I would like to establish the priority of Aristotle in the thought of George Frederick Holmes (1820-1897), the South's leading philosopher of the nineteenth century. Accompanying this aim is the possibility of an improved understanding of the historical \"Mind of the South\" and its particular orientation to the ongoing rise of modern civilization. Holmes copiously presented a firmly articulated \"metaphysics\" in a myriad of articles over a period stretching from the early 1840's until the end of the 1870's. Holmes spent much of his philosophical energy struggling with such then influential moderns as Comte, Spencer and Darwin. But for all that the basis of his thought remained Aristotelian in nature. If it be allowed that Aristotle can make a \"comeback\" under today's conditions perhaps George Frederick Holmes is also entitled to be viewed once again as a \"live option\" given the fundamentally Aristotelian nature of his thought.","PeriodicalId":283935,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Democratic Theory (Topic)","volume":"222 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Aristotelianism of George Frederick Holmes\",\"authors\":\"Colin D. Pearce\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1365356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper I would like to establish the priority of Aristotle in the thought of George Frederick Holmes (1820-1897), the South's leading philosopher of the nineteenth century. Accompanying this aim is the possibility of an improved understanding of the historical \\\"Mind of the South\\\" and its particular orientation to the ongoing rise of modern civilization. Holmes copiously presented a firmly articulated \\\"metaphysics\\\" in a myriad of articles over a period stretching from the early 1840's until the end of the 1870's. Holmes spent much of his philosophical energy struggling with such then influential moderns as Comte, Spencer and Darwin. But for all that the basis of his thought remained Aristotelian in nature. If it be allowed that Aristotle can make a \\\"comeback\\\" under today's conditions perhaps George Frederick Holmes is also entitled to be viewed once again as a \\\"live option\\\" given the fundamentally Aristotelian nature of his thought.\",\"PeriodicalId\":283935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Democratic Theory (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"222 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Democratic Theory (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1365356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Democratic Theory (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1365356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In this paper I would like to establish the priority of Aristotle in the thought of George Frederick Holmes (1820-1897), the South's leading philosopher of the nineteenth century. Accompanying this aim is the possibility of an improved understanding of the historical "Mind of the South" and its particular orientation to the ongoing rise of modern civilization. Holmes copiously presented a firmly articulated "metaphysics" in a myriad of articles over a period stretching from the early 1840's until the end of the 1870's. Holmes spent much of his philosophical energy struggling with such then influential moderns as Comte, Spencer and Darwin. But for all that the basis of his thought remained Aristotelian in nature. If it be allowed that Aristotle can make a "comeback" under today's conditions perhaps George Frederick Holmes is also entitled to be viewed once again as a "live option" given the fundamentally Aristotelian nature of his thought.