{"title":"海盗史","authors":"M. Fedorova, P. V. Kempen","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192845702.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Masha Fedorova and Piet Hein van Kempen eschew explorations of the nature of piracy to focus on whether there is some legal basis for an obligation in conventional and customary international law on states to criminalize piracy, concluding that such an obligation is absent. But the main thrust of the chapter is an historical survey which tries to decipher why this is the case.","PeriodicalId":244643,"journal":{"name":"Histories of Transnational Criminal Law","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A History of Maritime Piracy\",\"authors\":\"M. Fedorova, P. V. Kempen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780192845702.003.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Masha Fedorova and Piet Hein van Kempen eschew explorations of the nature of piracy to focus on whether there is some legal basis for an obligation in conventional and customary international law on states to criminalize piracy, concluding that such an obligation is absent. But the main thrust of the chapter is an historical survey which tries to decipher why this is the case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":244643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Histories of Transnational Criminal Law\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Histories of Transnational Criminal Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192845702.003.0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Histories of Transnational Criminal Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192845702.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Masha Fedorova和Piet Hein van Kempen回避了对海盗行为本质的探讨，而将重点放在了在常规和习惯国际法中是否存在一些法律依据，要求各国将海盗行为定为刑事犯罪，并得出结论认为这样的义务是不存在的。但这一章的主旨是一项历史调查，试图解释为什么会出现这种情况。
Masha Fedorova and Piet Hein van Kempen eschew explorations of the nature of piracy to focus on whether there is some legal basis for an obligation in conventional and customary international law on states to criminalize piracy, concluding that such an obligation is absent. But the main thrust of the chapter is an historical survey which tries to decipher why this is the case.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
