利用统计建模和机器学习自动解释冲击回波数据

Agnimitra Sengupta, Rahul Torlapati, Hoda Azari, Ilgin Guler, P. Shokouhi
{"title":"利用统计建模和机器学习自动解释冲击回波数据","authors":"Agnimitra Sengupta, Rahul Torlapati, Hoda Azari, Ilgin Guler, P. Shokouhi","doi":"10.32548/rs.2022.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Impact echo (IE) is becoming a standard nondestructive testing (NDT) tool for concrete bridge deck assessment thanks to its simplicity, established reliability and relatively low cost. The recent advances in automated data collection and non-contact measurements [1] [2] are also contributing to IE’s increasing popularity. The new generation of IE test equipment uses robotic platforms allowing faster data collection and larger areal coverage compared to the hand-held devices previously employed. The large volume of collected data presents numerous opportunities but also new challenges. The availability of NDT data facilitates data-driven decision making from IE (and other NDT) data while new approaches are needed to process and interpret ‘big’ NDT data [3] [4]. The former has been addressed for example in our recently published work, where IE data collected during Long Term Bridge Performance (LTBP) program are used to predict condition rating (CR) of concrete bridge decks [5]. This study focuses on the latter, the increasingly urgent need to automatically analyze and interpret IE data using statistical modeling, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL). We present results pertaining to the analyses of LTBP data without ground truth as well as those obtained on laboratory slabs with well-defined embedded defects [6]. The performance of different methods in IE signal classification is compared and discussed. Our findings indicate that the performance of different methods greatly depends on the amount and quality of available ‘labeled’ data (i.e., data tagged with the corresponding ground truth information). Creating standard quality labeled datasets is a critical step in exploiting ML and DL for IE (and other NDT) data analysis and interpretation.","PeriodicalId":367504,"journal":{"name":"ASNT 30th Research Symposium Conference Proceedings","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated Interpretation of Impact Echo Data using Statistical Modeling and Machine Learning\",\"authors\":\"Agnimitra Sengupta, Rahul Torlapati, Hoda Azari, Ilgin Guler, P. Shokouhi\",\"doi\":\"10.32548/rs.2022.028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Impact echo (IE) is becoming a standard nondestructive testing (NDT) tool for concrete bridge deck assessment thanks to its simplicity, established reliability and relatively low cost. The recent advances in automated data collection and non-contact measurements [1] [2] are also contributing to IE’s increasing popularity. The new generation of IE test equipment uses robotic platforms allowing faster data collection and larger areal coverage compared to the hand-held devices previously employed. The large volume of collected data presents numerous opportunities but also new challenges. The availability of NDT data facilitates data-driven decision making from IE (and other NDT) data while new approaches are needed to process and interpret ‘big’ NDT data [3] [4]. The former has been addressed for example in our recently published work, where IE data collected during Long Term Bridge Performance (LTBP) program are used to predict condition rating (CR) of concrete bridge decks [5]. This study focuses on the latter, the increasingly urgent need to automatically analyze and interpret IE data using statistical modeling, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL). We present results pertaining to the analyses of LTBP data without ground truth as well as those obtained on laboratory slabs with well-defined embedded defects [6]. The performance of different methods in IE signal classification is compared and discussed. Our findings indicate that the performance of different methods greatly depends on the amount and quality of available ‘labeled’ data (i.e., data tagged with the corresponding ground truth information). Creating standard quality labeled datasets is a critical step in exploiting ML and DL for IE (and other NDT) data analysis and interpretation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":367504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASNT 30th Research Symposium Conference Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASNT 30th Research Symposium Conference Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32548/rs.2022.028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASNT 30th Research Symposium Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32548/rs.2022.028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

冲击回波(IE)由于其简单、可靠和相对低廉的成本,正成为混凝土桥面评估的标准无损检测(NDT)工具。自动化数据收集和非接触式测量的最新进展[1][2]也促进了IE的日益普及。新一代IE测试设备使用机器人平台,与之前使用的手持设备相比,可以更快地收集数据,覆盖更大的区域。收集的大量数据提供了许多机会,但也带来了新的挑战。无损检测数据的可用性有助于从IE(和其他无损检测)数据中进行数据驱动的决策,同时需要新的方法来处理和解释“大”无损检测数据[3][4]。前者已经在我们最近发表的工作中得到了解决,例如,在长期桥梁性能(LTBP)计划中收集的IE数据用于预测混凝土桥面的状态等级(CR)[5]。本研究的重点是后者,越来越迫切需要使用统计建模、机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)来自动分析和解释IE数据。我们给出的结果与没有地面真值的LTBP数据分析有关,也与在具有明确定义的嵌入式缺陷的实验室板上获得的结果有关[6]。对不同的IE信号分类方法的性能进行了比较和讨论。我们的研究结果表明,不同方法的性能在很大程度上取决于可用的“标记”数据的数量和质量(即用相应的基础真值信息标记的数据)。创建标准质量的标记数据集是利用ML和DL进行IE(和其他无损检测)数据分析和解释的关键步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automated Interpretation of Impact Echo Data using Statistical Modeling and Machine Learning
Impact echo (IE) is becoming a standard nondestructive testing (NDT) tool for concrete bridge deck assessment thanks to its simplicity, established reliability and relatively low cost. The recent advances in automated data collection and non-contact measurements [1] [2] are also contributing to IE’s increasing popularity. The new generation of IE test equipment uses robotic platforms allowing faster data collection and larger areal coverage compared to the hand-held devices previously employed. The large volume of collected data presents numerous opportunities but also new challenges. The availability of NDT data facilitates data-driven decision making from IE (and other NDT) data while new approaches are needed to process and interpret ‘big’ NDT data [3] [4]. The former has been addressed for example in our recently published work, where IE data collected during Long Term Bridge Performance (LTBP) program are used to predict condition rating (CR) of concrete bridge decks [5]. This study focuses on the latter, the increasingly urgent need to automatically analyze and interpret IE data using statistical modeling, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL). We present results pertaining to the analyses of LTBP data without ground truth as well as those obtained on laboratory slabs with well-defined embedded defects [6]. The performance of different methods in IE signal classification is compared and discussed. Our findings indicate that the performance of different methods greatly depends on the amount and quality of available ‘labeled’ data (i.e., data tagged with the corresponding ground truth information). Creating standard quality labeled datasets is a critical step in exploiting ML and DL for IE (and other NDT) data analysis and interpretation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信