西非文学中的隐喻与奴隶贸易

R. Nathan
{"title":"西非文学中的隐喻与奴隶贸易","authors":"R. Nathan","doi":"10.1080/00083968.2013.829948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"However, the trouble with McCracken’s territorial frame is that questions about imperial geographies and imaginations are left unaddressed. This limitation is especially clear in his discussion of the settler-dominated Central African Federation, where there is little consideration of changing understandings of development in the Colonial Office. Federation revealed that Britain was committed to development in Malawi, but not to Malawi’s future as a political unit. The book’s final section centers on the process of decolonization. In contrast to the eclecticism of previous chapters, this section is principally devoted to a revisionist interpretation of Malawian nationalism. Drawing extensively from recent studies of the Congress Party, McCracken begins by tracing connections between rural protest movements and party-building after World War II. Popular discontent over conservation rules, land shortages, and racial discrimination laid a foundation for a national coalition of educated elites, chiefs, and peasants. Congress leaders juggled populist and constitutionalist strategies, partly by design but mostly as an opportunistic response to simmering rural protests. In the latter chapters, McCracken turns to high politics. With independence looming, Congress focused on the consolidation of political power in the villages, government, and party. Only the party proved difficult, as struggles within the leadership eventually threatened to topple Kamuzu Banda during the 1964 Cabinet Crisis. McCracken insists that intra-party struggles were motivated by political influence rather than ideology. The dominance of Congress, and Kamuzu in particular, is perhaps the most lasting change in a book that emphasizes continuity throughout. A History of Malawi is an essential reference for scholars of Malawi. McCracken’s focus on deep patterns of historical change, together with the thoroughness of the research, makes for a valuable contribution to multiple literatures. There is, however, comparatively little engagement with the wider Africanist historiography. McCracken could have pursued suggestive threads such as squatter movements in a comparative framework (238), or expand his discussion of welfare associations with recent scholarship on colonial intermediaries (235). The book nonetheless lends itself to broader readings. Historians of Malawi undoubtedly will benefit most from McCracken’s comprehensive history, but Africanist historians should take heed of the rich material for transnational or comparative research as well.","PeriodicalId":172027,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of African Studies/ La Revue canadienne des études africaines","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metaphor and the slave trade in West African Literature\",\"authors\":\"R. Nathan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00083968.2013.829948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"However, the trouble with McCracken’s territorial frame is that questions about imperial geographies and imaginations are left unaddressed. This limitation is especially clear in his discussion of the settler-dominated Central African Federation, where there is little consideration of changing understandings of development in the Colonial Office. Federation revealed that Britain was committed to development in Malawi, but not to Malawi’s future as a political unit. The book’s final section centers on the process of decolonization. In contrast to the eclecticism of previous chapters, this section is principally devoted to a revisionist interpretation of Malawian nationalism. Drawing extensively from recent studies of the Congress Party, McCracken begins by tracing connections between rural protest movements and party-building after World War II. Popular discontent over conservation rules, land shortages, and racial discrimination laid a foundation for a national coalition of educated elites, chiefs, and peasants. Congress leaders juggled populist and constitutionalist strategies, partly by design but mostly as an opportunistic response to simmering rural protests. In the latter chapters, McCracken turns to high politics. With independence looming, Congress focused on the consolidation of political power in the villages, government, and party. Only the party proved difficult, as struggles within the leadership eventually threatened to topple Kamuzu Banda during the 1964 Cabinet Crisis. McCracken insists that intra-party struggles were motivated by political influence rather than ideology. The dominance of Congress, and Kamuzu in particular, is perhaps the most lasting change in a book that emphasizes continuity throughout. A History of Malawi is an essential reference for scholars of Malawi. McCracken’s focus on deep patterns of historical change, together with the thoroughness of the research, makes for a valuable contribution to multiple literatures. There is, however, comparatively little engagement with the wider Africanist historiography. McCracken could have pursued suggestive threads such as squatter movements in a comparative framework (238), or expand his discussion of welfare associations with recent scholarship on colonial intermediaries (235). The book nonetheless lends itself to broader readings. Historians of Malawi undoubtedly will benefit most from McCracken’s comprehensive history, but Africanist historians should take heed of the rich material for transnational or comparative research as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":172027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of African Studies/ La Revue canadienne des études africaines\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of African Studies/ La Revue canadienne des études africaines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00083968.2013.829948\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of African Studies/ La Revue canadienne des études africaines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00083968.2013.829948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

然而,麦克拉肯的领土框架的问题在于,关于帝国地理和想象的问题没有得到解决。这种局限在他对定居者占主导地位的中非联邦的讨论中表现得尤为明显,那里很少考虑改变殖民办事处对发展的理解。联邦透露,英国致力于马拉维的发展,但不是马拉维作为一个政治单位的未来。这本书的最后一部分以非殖民化进程为中心。与前几章的折衷主义不同,本节主要致力于对马拉维民族主义的修正主义解释。麦克拉肯广泛借鉴了最近对国大党的研究,他首先追溯了二战后农村抗议运动与党的建设之间的联系。民众对保护条例、土地短缺和种族歧视的不满为受过教育的精英、酋长和农民组成的全国联盟奠定了基础。国大党领导人在民粹主义和立宪主义策略之间摇摆不定,部分是有意为之,但主要是对酝酿中的农村抗议活动的机会主义回应。在后面的章节中,麦克拉肯转向了高级政治。随着独立的迫近,国会把重点放在巩固村庄、政府和政党的政治权力上。只有党被证明是困难的,因为领导层内部的斗争最终在1964年的内阁危机中威胁要推翻Kamuzu Banda。麦克拉肯坚持认为党内斗争是由政治影响而不是意识形态引起的。国会的主导地位,尤其是Kamuzu的主导地位,可能是这本贯穿始终强调连贯性的书中最持久的变化。《马拉维历史》是研究马拉维的学者必不可少的参考书。麦克拉肯对历史变化的深层模式的关注,以及研究的彻彻性,为多种文献做出了宝贵的贡献。然而,与更广泛的非洲主义史学的接触相对较少。麦克拉肯本可以在一个比较的框架中探索一些暗含性的线索,比如棚户运动(238),或者用最近关于殖民中介的学术研究来扩展他对福利协会的讨论(235)。尽管如此,这本书还是适合更广泛的阅读。毫无疑问,马拉维的历史学家将从麦克拉肯的全面历史中受益最多,但非洲历史学家也应该注意跨国研究或比较研究的丰富材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Metaphor and the slave trade in West African Literature
However, the trouble with McCracken’s territorial frame is that questions about imperial geographies and imaginations are left unaddressed. This limitation is especially clear in his discussion of the settler-dominated Central African Federation, where there is little consideration of changing understandings of development in the Colonial Office. Federation revealed that Britain was committed to development in Malawi, but not to Malawi’s future as a political unit. The book’s final section centers on the process of decolonization. In contrast to the eclecticism of previous chapters, this section is principally devoted to a revisionist interpretation of Malawian nationalism. Drawing extensively from recent studies of the Congress Party, McCracken begins by tracing connections between rural protest movements and party-building after World War II. Popular discontent over conservation rules, land shortages, and racial discrimination laid a foundation for a national coalition of educated elites, chiefs, and peasants. Congress leaders juggled populist and constitutionalist strategies, partly by design but mostly as an opportunistic response to simmering rural protests. In the latter chapters, McCracken turns to high politics. With independence looming, Congress focused on the consolidation of political power in the villages, government, and party. Only the party proved difficult, as struggles within the leadership eventually threatened to topple Kamuzu Banda during the 1964 Cabinet Crisis. McCracken insists that intra-party struggles were motivated by political influence rather than ideology. The dominance of Congress, and Kamuzu in particular, is perhaps the most lasting change in a book that emphasizes continuity throughout. A History of Malawi is an essential reference for scholars of Malawi. McCracken’s focus on deep patterns of historical change, together with the thoroughness of the research, makes for a valuable contribution to multiple literatures. There is, however, comparatively little engagement with the wider Africanist historiography. McCracken could have pursued suggestive threads such as squatter movements in a comparative framework (238), or expand his discussion of welfare associations with recent scholarship on colonial intermediaries (235). The book nonetheless lends itself to broader readings. Historians of Malawi undoubtedly will benefit most from McCracken’s comprehensive history, but Africanist historians should take heed of the rich material for transnational or comparative research as well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信