{"title":"舰船目标识别的神经网络方法","authors":"M. Inggs, A. Robinson","doi":"10.1109/RADAR.1995.522577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper summarizes current research into the applications of neural networks for radar ship target recognition. Three very different neural architectures are investigated and compared, namely; the feedforward network with backpropagation, Kohonen's (1990) supervised learning vector quantization network, and Simpson's (see IEEE Trans on Neural Networks, vol.3, no.5, p.776-787, 1992) fuzzy min-max neural network. In all cases, preprocessing in the form of the Fourier-modified discrete Mellin transform is used as a means of extracting feature vectors which are insensitive to the aspect angle of the radar. Classification tests are based on both simulated and real data. Classification accuracies of up to 93% are reported.","PeriodicalId":326587,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings International Radar Conference","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neural approaches to ship target recognition\",\"authors\":\"M. Inggs, A. Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RADAR.1995.522577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper summarizes current research into the applications of neural networks for radar ship target recognition. Three very different neural architectures are investigated and compared, namely; the feedforward network with backpropagation, Kohonen's (1990) supervised learning vector quantization network, and Simpson's (see IEEE Trans on Neural Networks, vol.3, no.5, p.776-787, 1992) fuzzy min-max neural network. In all cases, preprocessing in the form of the Fourier-modified discrete Mellin transform is used as a means of extracting feature vectors which are insensitive to the aspect angle of the radar. Classification tests are based on both simulated and real data. Classification accuracies of up to 93% are reported.\",\"PeriodicalId\":326587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings International Radar Conference\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings International Radar Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RADAR.1995.522577\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings International Radar Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RADAR.1995.522577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22
摘要
本文综述了神经网络在雷达舰船目标识别中的应用研究现状。研究和比较了三种非常不同的神经结构,即;具有反向传播的前馈网络,Kohonen(1990)的监督学习矢量量化网络,以及Simpson的(见IEEE Trans on Neural Networks, vol.3, no. 5)。(5)模糊最小-最大神经网络。在所有情况下,以傅里叶修正离散Mellin变换的形式进行预处理,作为提取对雷达向角不敏感的特征向量的手段。分类试验基于模拟数据和真实数据。据报道,分类准确率高达93%。
This paper summarizes current research into the applications of neural networks for radar ship target recognition. Three very different neural architectures are investigated and compared, namely; the feedforward network with backpropagation, Kohonen's (1990) supervised learning vector quantization network, and Simpson's (see IEEE Trans on Neural Networks, vol.3, no.5, p.776-787, 1992) fuzzy min-max neural network. In all cases, preprocessing in the form of the Fourier-modified discrete Mellin transform is used as a means of extracting feature vectors which are insensitive to the aspect angle of the radar. Classification tests are based on both simulated and real data. Classification accuracies of up to 93% are reported.