探讨思维导图在早期设计中作为问题探索工具的作用

Ting-Ju Chen, S. Vyas, Vinayak R. Krishnamurthy
{"title":"探讨思维导图在早期设计中作为问题探索工具的作用","authors":"Ting-Ju Chen, S. Vyas, Vinayak R. Krishnamurthy","doi":"10.1115/detc2021-71750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We present an experiment to study the role of mind-mapping as a tool for design opportunity identification and problem understanding. Our goal is to investigate how the quality of design opportunity statements change with two different techniques, namely, mind-mapping and free writing. Identifying design opportunities is an important step in new product development and little is currently understood in terms of what tools can provide cognitive support for problem clarification. In this work, we focus on mind-mapping as one example of a potential tool for providing such support. Mind-maps are well-known for their ability to enable the exploration of ideas in an unconstrained and structured way. To study their role in helping problem exploration, we conducted a between-subject user study with 28 participants to investigate how information structure and organization affect the exploration of ideas in a given design context. Further, we propose new evaluation metrics to quantitatively assess key elements presented in the design opportunity statements generated after exploring the problem domain. We report on the quantitative results, the exploration behaviors, and the general user feedback about the experience. Finally, we discuss the implications of these findings on design problem identification and future digital mind-mapping tools for exploratory tasks.","PeriodicalId":261968,"journal":{"name":"Volume 6: 33rd International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology (DTM)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating Mind-Mapping as a Tool for Problem Exploration in Early Design\",\"authors\":\"Ting-Ju Chen, S. Vyas, Vinayak R. Krishnamurthy\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/detc2021-71750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We present an experiment to study the role of mind-mapping as a tool for design opportunity identification and problem understanding. Our goal is to investigate how the quality of design opportunity statements change with two different techniques, namely, mind-mapping and free writing. Identifying design opportunities is an important step in new product development and little is currently understood in terms of what tools can provide cognitive support for problem clarification. In this work, we focus on mind-mapping as one example of a potential tool for providing such support. Mind-maps are well-known for their ability to enable the exploration of ideas in an unconstrained and structured way. To study their role in helping problem exploration, we conducted a between-subject user study with 28 participants to investigate how information structure and organization affect the exploration of ideas in a given design context. Further, we propose new evaluation metrics to quantitatively assess key elements presented in the design opportunity statements generated after exploring the problem domain. We report on the quantitative results, the exploration behaviors, and the general user feedback about the experience. Finally, we discuss the implications of these findings on design problem identification and future digital mind-mapping tools for exploratory tasks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":261968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 6: 33rd International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology (DTM)\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 6: 33rd International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology (DTM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2021-71750\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 6: 33rd International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology (DTM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2021-71750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们提出了一个实验来研究思维导图作为设计机会识别和问题理解工具的作用。我们的目标是研究两种不同的技术,即思维导图和自由写作,如何改变设计机会陈述的质量。识别设计机会是新产品开发的重要一步,目前人们对哪些工具可以为问题澄清提供认知支持知之甚少。在这项工作中,我们关注思维导图作为提供这种支持的潜在工具的一个例子。思维导图以其以不受约束和结构化的方式探索想法的能力而闻名。为了研究它们在帮助问题探索中的作用,我们对28名参与者进行了一项主题间用户研究,以调查在给定的设计环境中信息结构和组织如何影响想法的探索。此外,我们提出了新的评估指标,以定量地评估在探索问题域后生成的设计机会声明中呈现的关键元素。我们报告定量结果、探索行为和用户对体验的一般反馈。最后,我们讨论了这些发现对设计问题识别和未来探索性任务的数字思维导图工具的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating Mind-Mapping as a Tool for Problem Exploration in Early Design
We present an experiment to study the role of mind-mapping as a tool for design opportunity identification and problem understanding. Our goal is to investigate how the quality of design opportunity statements change with two different techniques, namely, mind-mapping and free writing. Identifying design opportunities is an important step in new product development and little is currently understood in terms of what tools can provide cognitive support for problem clarification. In this work, we focus on mind-mapping as one example of a potential tool for providing such support. Mind-maps are well-known for their ability to enable the exploration of ideas in an unconstrained and structured way. To study their role in helping problem exploration, we conducted a between-subject user study with 28 participants to investigate how information structure and organization affect the exploration of ideas in a given design context. Further, we propose new evaluation metrics to quantitatively assess key elements presented in the design opportunity statements generated after exploring the problem domain. We report on the quantitative results, the exploration behaviors, and the general user feedback about the experience. Finally, we discuss the implications of these findings on design problem identification and future digital mind-mapping tools for exploratory tasks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信