{"title":"免疫刺激剂OM-85预防小儿反复上呼吸道感染的经济分析","authors":"R. Ravasio","doi":"10.5301/GRHTA.5000200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the cost of preventing recurrent upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) with a non- specific immunostimulating agent (OM-85) in at-risk children. Methods: A cost consequence analysis was conducted considering three different perspectives: Community, National Health Service and patient. A pre-existing decisional model was used to compare prophylaxis with OM-85 and no prophylaxis. The clinical data was based on the weighted average of the results of nine randomized pla-cebo-controlled trials identified by a Cochrane literature review. Clinical events considered in the model were natural resolution of the infection, onset of complications (acute otitis media, sinusitis, others) and their evolu-tion. Direct and indirect costs incurred by patient, NHS and Community were structured in accordance with the most authoritative guidelines and implemented with current Italian prices and tariffs. Sensibility analyses were performed to evaluate the model robustness. Results: The immunostimulating agent OM-85 achieved savings for 40.30 euro/patient in the perspective of the National Health Service and for 182.99 euro/patient in the community’s perspective. Sensitivity analyses con-firmed the robustness of base scenario results. Conclusions: Non-specific immunotherapy with OM-85 reduces the incidence of URTIs in at-risk children to-gether with savings for the community and NHS.","PeriodicalId":228031,"journal":{"name":"Global and Regional Health Technology Assessment","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic Analysis of the Immunostimulant OM-85 for the Prevention of Paediatric Recurrent Upper Respiratory Tract Infections\",\"authors\":\"R. Ravasio\",\"doi\":\"10.5301/GRHTA.5000200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To evaluate the cost of preventing recurrent upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) with a non- specific immunostimulating agent (OM-85) in at-risk children. Methods: A cost consequence analysis was conducted considering three different perspectives: Community, National Health Service and patient. A pre-existing decisional model was used to compare prophylaxis with OM-85 and no prophylaxis. The clinical data was based on the weighted average of the results of nine randomized pla-cebo-controlled trials identified by a Cochrane literature review. Clinical events considered in the model were natural resolution of the infection, onset of complications (acute otitis media, sinusitis, others) and their evolu-tion. Direct and indirect costs incurred by patient, NHS and Community were structured in accordance with the most authoritative guidelines and implemented with current Italian prices and tariffs. Sensibility analyses were performed to evaluate the model robustness. Results: The immunostimulating agent OM-85 achieved savings for 40.30 euro/patient in the perspective of the National Health Service and for 182.99 euro/patient in the community’s perspective. Sensitivity analyses con-firmed the robustness of base scenario results. Conclusions: Non-specific immunotherapy with OM-85 reduces the incidence of URTIs in at-risk children to-gether with savings for the community and NHS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":228031,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global and Regional Health Technology Assessment\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global and Regional Health Technology Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5301/GRHTA.5000200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global and Regional Health Technology Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5301/GRHTA.5000200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Economic Analysis of the Immunostimulant OM-85 for the Prevention of Paediatric Recurrent Upper Respiratory Tract Infections
Objective: To evaluate the cost of preventing recurrent upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) with a non- specific immunostimulating agent (OM-85) in at-risk children. Methods: A cost consequence analysis was conducted considering three different perspectives: Community, National Health Service and patient. A pre-existing decisional model was used to compare prophylaxis with OM-85 and no prophylaxis. The clinical data was based on the weighted average of the results of nine randomized pla-cebo-controlled trials identified by a Cochrane literature review. Clinical events considered in the model were natural resolution of the infection, onset of complications (acute otitis media, sinusitis, others) and their evolu-tion. Direct and indirect costs incurred by patient, NHS and Community were structured in accordance with the most authoritative guidelines and implemented with current Italian prices and tariffs. Sensibility analyses were performed to evaluate the model robustness. Results: The immunostimulating agent OM-85 achieved savings for 40.30 euro/patient in the perspective of the National Health Service and for 182.99 euro/patient in the community’s perspective. Sensitivity analyses con-firmed the robustness of base scenario results. Conclusions: Non-specific immunotherapy with OM-85 reduces the incidence of URTIs in at-risk children to-gether with savings for the community and NHS.