在动态前线管理过程安全风险

Simon Jones, C. Brewer
{"title":"在动态前线管理过程安全风险","authors":"Simon Jones, C. Brewer","doi":"10.2118/191693-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Process safety approaches developed and implemented over the past 20-30 years have enabled us to improve the design basis of our facilities. Yet we still see major incidents occurring at a steady rate. Traditional approaches to risk management may be appropriate as a basis for design, but they are not helpful in operations management where decisions continuously take place that impacts exposure to Major Accident Hazard (MAH) risk.\n A 2017 international survey1 looked into the state of process safety and risk management in the hazardous industries. 70% of survey respondents reported a gap between how process safety management is intended and the reality of operations. Only six percent of respondents indicated their companies were up-to-date on safety critical maintenance. The survey results highlighted that the real world of operations is neither simple nor static and highlighted a gap in organizations’ abilities to develop a single, shared view of the operational reality of risk.\n The current trend towards digitalization of the industry offers companies an opportunity for a clearer understanding of risk to reduce incidents and enhance the journey towards sustainable production and Operational Excellence. So-called \"big data\" and \"edge data\" techniques applied to the streams of data arising from modern facilities holds out the promise of a process safety early warning system that looks at potential signals and trends in facility operations data to make MAH risk exposure visible, prominent and available in real-time.\n A new category of Operational Risk Management (ORM) software tools is emerging which seek to deliver on this promise. This paper shares the approaches adopted by two major international oil industry operators who are leveraging a new approach to process safety and operational risk management to achieve safer, more sustainable operations.","PeriodicalId":441169,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, September 26, 2018","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing Process Safety Risk at the Dynamic Frontline\",\"authors\":\"Simon Jones, C. Brewer\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/191693-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Process safety approaches developed and implemented over the past 20-30 years have enabled us to improve the design basis of our facilities. Yet we still see major incidents occurring at a steady rate. Traditional approaches to risk management may be appropriate as a basis for design, but they are not helpful in operations management where decisions continuously take place that impacts exposure to Major Accident Hazard (MAH) risk.\\n A 2017 international survey1 looked into the state of process safety and risk management in the hazardous industries. 70% of survey respondents reported a gap between how process safety management is intended and the reality of operations. Only six percent of respondents indicated their companies were up-to-date on safety critical maintenance. The survey results highlighted that the real world of operations is neither simple nor static and highlighted a gap in organizations’ abilities to develop a single, shared view of the operational reality of risk.\\n The current trend towards digitalization of the industry offers companies an opportunity for a clearer understanding of risk to reduce incidents and enhance the journey towards sustainable production and Operational Excellence. So-called \\\"big data\\\" and \\\"edge data\\\" techniques applied to the streams of data arising from modern facilities holds out the promise of a process safety early warning system that looks at potential signals and trends in facility operations data to make MAH risk exposure visible, prominent and available in real-time.\\n A new category of Operational Risk Management (ORM) software tools is emerging which seek to deliver on this promise. This paper shares the approaches adopted by two major international oil industry operators who are leveraging a new approach to process safety and operational risk management to achieve safer, more sustainable operations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":441169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, September 26, 2018\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, September 26, 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/191693-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, September 26, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191693-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的20-30年里开发和实施的过程安全方法使我们能够改进我们设施的设计基础。然而,我们仍然看到重大事件在稳步发生。传统的风险管理方法可能适合作为设计的基础,但它们对运营管理没有帮助,因为运营管理中的决策不断发生,会影响重大事故危险(MAH)风险的暴露。2017年的一项国际调查调查了危险行业的过程安全和风险管理状况。70%的受访者表示,过程安全管理的预期与实际操作之间存在差距。只有6%的受访者表示,他们的公司在安全关键维护方面是最新的。调查结果强调,现实世界的运营既不简单也不是静态的,并强调了组织在形成单一的、共享的风险运营现实观点方面的能力差距。当前行业的数字化趋势为公司提供了一个更清晰地了解风险的机会,以减少事故,促进可持续生产和卓越运营。所谓的“大数据”和“边缘数据”技术应用于现代设施产生的数据流,为过程安全预警系统提供了希望,该系统可以查看设施运行数据中的潜在信号和趋势,从而使MAH风险暴露可见、突出和实时可用。一种新的操作风险管理(ORM)软件工具正在出现,它试图实现这一承诺。本文分享了两家主要的国际石油行业运营商采用的方法,他们正在利用一种新的方法来实现过程安全和运营风险管理,以实现更安全、更可持续的运营。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Managing Process Safety Risk at the Dynamic Frontline
Process safety approaches developed and implemented over the past 20-30 years have enabled us to improve the design basis of our facilities. Yet we still see major incidents occurring at a steady rate. Traditional approaches to risk management may be appropriate as a basis for design, but they are not helpful in operations management where decisions continuously take place that impacts exposure to Major Accident Hazard (MAH) risk. A 2017 international survey1 looked into the state of process safety and risk management in the hazardous industries. 70% of survey respondents reported a gap between how process safety management is intended and the reality of operations. Only six percent of respondents indicated their companies were up-to-date on safety critical maintenance. The survey results highlighted that the real world of operations is neither simple nor static and highlighted a gap in organizations’ abilities to develop a single, shared view of the operational reality of risk. The current trend towards digitalization of the industry offers companies an opportunity for a clearer understanding of risk to reduce incidents and enhance the journey towards sustainable production and Operational Excellence. So-called "big data" and "edge data" techniques applied to the streams of data arising from modern facilities holds out the promise of a process safety early warning system that looks at potential signals and trends in facility operations data to make MAH risk exposure visible, prominent and available in real-time. A new category of Operational Risk Management (ORM) software tools is emerging which seek to deliver on this promise. This paper shares the approaches adopted by two major international oil industry operators who are leveraging a new approach to process safety and operational risk management to achieve safer, more sustainable operations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信