100岁的拉姆齐法则:将过度生长的树木配对

C. Sanchirico
{"title":"100岁的拉姆齐法则:将过度生长的树木配对","authors":"C. Sanchirico","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3925625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1927 the mathematician Frank Ramsey published a paper on optimal taxation in which he put forward what has come to be known as the “Ramsey rule”. Nearly one hundred years later, Ramsey’s paper remains a go-to reference for normative tax theory in a number of fields, including legal scholarship. This paper reviews the reasoning behind the Ramsey rule and attempts to clear up various points of confusion that have grown up over decades of perfunctory citation. It explains in simple terms what the rule is and how it is derived. It then critically analyzes the rule’s most prevalent interpretations, arguing that these range from uninformative to misleading. An online mathematical appendix is available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3925626.","PeriodicalId":231496,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Law & Economics: Public Law (Topic)","volume":"215 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ramsey Rule at 100: Pairing Back the Overgrowth\",\"authors\":\"C. Sanchirico\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3925625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1927 the mathematician Frank Ramsey published a paper on optimal taxation in which he put forward what has come to be known as the “Ramsey rule”. Nearly one hundred years later, Ramsey’s paper remains a go-to reference for normative tax theory in a number of fields, including legal scholarship. This paper reviews the reasoning behind the Ramsey rule and attempts to clear up various points of confusion that have grown up over decades of perfunctory citation. It explains in simple terms what the rule is and how it is derived. It then critically analyzes the rule’s most prevalent interpretations, arguing that these range from uninformative to misleading. An online mathematical appendix is available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3925626.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Law & Economics: Public Law (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"215 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Law & Economics: Public Law (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3925625\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Law & Economics: Public Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3925625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1927年,数学家弗兰克•拉姆齐(Frank Ramsey)发表了一篇关于最优税收的论文,其中他提出了后来被称为“拉姆齐规则”的理论。近100年后,拉姆齐的论文仍然是许多领域(包括法律学术)规范税收理论的参考。本文回顾了拉姆齐规则背后的推理,并试图澄清在几十年的敷衍引用中产生的各种混淆点。它简单地解释了规则是什么以及它是如何推导出来的。然后,它批判性地分析了该规则最普遍的解释,认为这些解释从缺乏信息到具有误导性。在线数学附录可在https://ssrn.com/abstract=3925626上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Ramsey Rule at 100: Pairing Back the Overgrowth
In 1927 the mathematician Frank Ramsey published a paper on optimal taxation in which he put forward what has come to be known as the “Ramsey rule”. Nearly one hundred years later, Ramsey’s paper remains a go-to reference for normative tax theory in a number of fields, including legal scholarship. This paper reviews the reasoning behind the Ramsey rule and attempts to clear up various points of confusion that have grown up over decades of perfunctory citation. It explains in simple terms what the rule is and how it is derived. It then critically analyzes the rule’s most prevalent interpretations, arguing that these range from uninformative to misleading. An online mathematical appendix is available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3925626.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信