跨境破产程序中的衍生工具

F. Garcimartín
{"title":"跨境破产程序中的衍生工具","authors":"F. Garcimartín","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2731772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As regards close-out netting provisions and financial collateral arrangements, one of the main consequences of the recent financial crisis has been the review of the privileged status of these instruments. This paper describes, in general terms, these changes and analyzes the policy underlying them, in particular in relation to the conflict-of-laws dimension. The EU legislation will be used as an example of this relative change of paradigm. Since these changes have been inspired by supranational institutions, the analysis may also be applicable mutatis mutandi to others jurisdictions.","PeriodicalId":313622,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Derivatives in Cross-Border Insolvency Proceedings\",\"authors\":\"F. Garcimartín\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2731772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As regards close-out netting provisions and financial collateral arrangements, one of the main consequences of the recent financial crisis has been the review of the privileged status of these instruments. This paper describes, in general terms, these changes and analyzes the policy underlying them, in particular in relation to the conflict-of-laws dimension. The EU legislation will be used as an example of this relative change of paradigm. Since these changes have been inspired by supranational institutions, the analysis may also be applicable mutatis mutandi to others jurisdictions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":313622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration\",\"volume\":\"119 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2731772\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2731772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

关于结清净额规定和金融担保安排,最近金融危机的主要后果之一是审查了这些工具的特权地位。本文概括地描述了这些变化,并分析了这些变化背后的政策,特别是与法律冲突有关的政策。欧盟立法将被用作范式相对变化的一个例子。由于这些变化是由超国家机构引起的,因此,这种分析也可能在必要时适用于其他司法管辖区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Derivatives in Cross-Border Insolvency Proceedings
As regards close-out netting provisions and financial collateral arrangements, one of the main consequences of the recent financial crisis has been the review of the privileged status of these instruments. This paper describes, in general terms, these changes and analyzes the policy underlying them, in particular in relation to the conflict-of-laws dimension. The EU legislation will be used as an example of this relative change of paradigm. Since these changes have been inspired by supranational institutions, the analysis may also be applicable mutatis mutandi to others jurisdictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信