算法与规则

Amnon Reichman, G. Sartor
{"title":"算法与规则","authors":"Amnon Reichman, G. Sartor","doi":"10.1017/9781108914857.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Algorithms – generally understood as sequences of precise instruction unambiguously specifying how to execute a task or solve a problem – are such a natural ingredient of regulation that some may wonder whether regulation could even be understood without recognising its algorithmic features, and without realising algorithms as a prime subject for regulation. In terms of the algorithmic features of regulation, somewhat simplistically and without suggesting in any way that the algorithmic language captures regulation in its entirety – far from it – algorithms are relevant to the three dimensions of regulation: the regulatory process, the modalities of regulation, and the regulatory approaches (or attitudes). By the regulatory process, we refer to the process that, stylistically, commences with political and economic pressures to find a solution to a certain problem and continues with the formation of policy goals, data gathering, and the mapping of possible regulatory responses to achieve these goals (which ought to include the sub-processes of regulatory impact assessment upon choosing the preferred measure). The chosen measures are translated into regulatory norms and implemented (or enforced), resulting, if all went well, with some improvement of the conditions related to the initial social problem (as can be analysed by a back-end regulatory impact assessment). By regulatory modalities, we mean the set of regulatory measures available to the state (or, more accurately, to state agencies acting as regulators): regulation through (and of) information, permits and licensing, civil, administrative and criminal liability, taxes and subsidies, or insurance schemes. By regulatory approaches, or attitudes, we mean the top-down command and control attitude, performance-based regulation, and themanagerial approach, with the latter two also including co-regulation or private regulation. Algorithms are relevant to all three dimensions of regulation, as they may assist most, if not all, stages of the regulatory process, may inform or even be a component of the regulatory modalities, and may similarly inform and be integrated into the regulatory attitudes. Conversely, algorithms may be the subject matter of regulation.","PeriodicalId":183658,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Challenges in the Algorithmic Society","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Algorithms and Regulation\",\"authors\":\"Amnon Reichman, G. Sartor\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781108914857.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Algorithms – generally understood as sequences of precise instruction unambiguously specifying how to execute a task or solve a problem – are such a natural ingredient of regulation that some may wonder whether regulation could even be understood without recognising its algorithmic features, and without realising algorithms as a prime subject for regulation. In terms of the algorithmic features of regulation, somewhat simplistically and without suggesting in any way that the algorithmic language captures regulation in its entirety – far from it – algorithms are relevant to the three dimensions of regulation: the regulatory process, the modalities of regulation, and the regulatory approaches (or attitudes). By the regulatory process, we refer to the process that, stylistically, commences with political and economic pressures to find a solution to a certain problem and continues with the formation of policy goals, data gathering, and the mapping of possible regulatory responses to achieve these goals (which ought to include the sub-processes of regulatory impact assessment upon choosing the preferred measure). The chosen measures are translated into regulatory norms and implemented (or enforced), resulting, if all went well, with some improvement of the conditions related to the initial social problem (as can be analysed by a back-end regulatory impact assessment). By regulatory modalities, we mean the set of regulatory measures available to the state (or, more accurately, to state agencies acting as regulators): regulation through (and of) information, permits and licensing, civil, administrative and criminal liability, taxes and subsidies, or insurance schemes. By regulatory approaches, or attitudes, we mean the top-down command and control attitude, performance-based regulation, and themanagerial approach, with the latter two also including co-regulation or private regulation. Algorithms are relevant to all three dimensions of regulation, as they may assist most, if not all, stages of the regulatory process, may inform or even be a component of the regulatory modalities, and may similarly inform and be integrated into the regulatory attitudes. Conversely, algorithms may be the subject matter of regulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":183658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Constitutional Challenges in the Algorithmic Society\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Constitutional Challenges in the Algorithmic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914857.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constitutional Challenges in the Algorithmic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914857.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

算法——通常被理解为明确规定如何执行任务或解决问题的精确指令序列——是监管的一个自然组成部分,以至于有些人可能会怀疑,如果不认识到其算法特征,不认识到算法是监管的主要主题,监管是否能被理解。就监管的算法特征而言,算法语言在某种程度上是简单的,并没有以任何方式暗示算法语言完整地捕捉了监管——远非如此——算法与监管的三个维度相关:监管过程、监管模式和监管方法(或态度)。通过监管过程,我们指的是这样一个过程,从风格上讲,从政治和经济压力开始,寻找解决某个问题的办法,然后继续形成政策目标,收集数据,绘制可能的监管反应图,以实现这些目标(这应该包括在选择首选措施时进行监管影响评估的子过程)。所选择的措施被转化为监管规范并实施(或强制执行),结果,如果一切顺利,与最初的社会问题相关的条件会有所改善(可以通过后端监管影响评估进行分析)。通过监管模式,我们指的是国家(或者更准确地说,作为监管机构的国家机构)可用的一套监管措施:通过(和)信息、许可和许可、民事、行政和刑事责任、税收和补贴或保险计划进行监管。通过监管方法或态度,我们指的是自上而下的命令和控制态度,基于绩效的监管和管理方式,后两者还包括共同监管或私人监管。算法与监管的所有三个方面都相关,因为它们可以协助监管过程的大多数阶段(如果不是全部阶段的话),可以为监管模式提供信息,甚至可以成为监管模式的一个组成部分,并且同样可以为监管态度提供信息并将其纳入其中。相反,算法可能是监管的对象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Algorithms and Regulation
Algorithms – generally understood as sequences of precise instruction unambiguously specifying how to execute a task or solve a problem – are such a natural ingredient of regulation that some may wonder whether regulation could even be understood without recognising its algorithmic features, and without realising algorithms as a prime subject for regulation. In terms of the algorithmic features of regulation, somewhat simplistically and without suggesting in any way that the algorithmic language captures regulation in its entirety – far from it – algorithms are relevant to the three dimensions of regulation: the regulatory process, the modalities of regulation, and the regulatory approaches (or attitudes). By the regulatory process, we refer to the process that, stylistically, commences with political and economic pressures to find a solution to a certain problem and continues with the formation of policy goals, data gathering, and the mapping of possible regulatory responses to achieve these goals (which ought to include the sub-processes of regulatory impact assessment upon choosing the preferred measure). The chosen measures are translated into regulatory norms and implemented (or enforced), resulting, if all went well, with some improvement of the conditions related to the initial social problem (as can be analysed by a back-end regulatory impact assessment). By regulatory modalities, we mean the set of regulatory measures available to the state (or, more accurately, to state agencies acting as regulators): regulation through (and of) information, permits and licensing, civil, administrative and criminal liability, taxes and subsidies, or insurance schemes. By regulatory approaches, or attitudes, we mean the top-down command and control attitude, performance-based regulation, and themanagerial approach, with the latter two also including co-regulation or private regulation. Algorithms are relevant to all three dimensions of regulation, as they may assist most, if not all, stages of the regulatory process, may inform or even be a component of the regulatory modalities, and may similarly inform and be integrated into the regulatory attitudes. Conversely, algorithms may be the subject matter of regulation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信