苏联技术官僚精英的形成和转变

N. Aleksandr
{"title":"苏联技术官僚精英的形成和转变","authors":"N. Aleksandr","doi":"10.15593/perm.kipf/2018.2.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 1980-s technocratic elite became the main subject of the social order transformation in our country. Most industrial man- agement appeared to be the supporters of the existed social relations’ reforms. The first stage of the so called perestroika (“acceleration”) had the technocratic character. Immediate results of economic reforms of the 1980-s allowed domestic technocrats considerably making their positions strong. The pressure of industrial managers became the most important factor in the fina choice of privatization and ad-justment of the Russian government course at the beginning of the 1990-s. Technocratic bureaucracy also came in between nomencla- ture and “democrats” in the process of new authoritative elites’ formation. In the middle of the 1990-s domestic technocracy definitely cycled came back to the original point in a sense.","PeriodicalId":270607,"journal":{"name":"BULLETIN OF PNRPU. Culture. History. Philosophy. Law","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FORMATION AND TRANSFORMATION OF THE SOVIET TECHNOCRATIC ELITE\",\"authors\":\"N. Aleksandr\",\"doi\":\"10.15593/perm.kipf/2018.2.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the 1980-s technocratic elite became the main subject of the social order transformation in our country. Most industrial man- agement appeared to be the supporters of the existed social relations’ reforms. The first stage of the so called perestroika (“acceleration”) had the technocratic character. Immediate results of economic reforms of the 1980-s allowed domestic technocrats considerably making their positions strong. The pressure of industrial managers became the most important factor in the fina choice of privatization and ad-justment of the Russian government course at the beginning of the 1990-s. Technocratic bureaucracy also came in between nomencla- ture and “democrats” in the process of new authoritative elites’ formation. In the middle of the 1990-s domestic technocracy definitely cycled came back to the original point in a sense.\",\"PeriodicalId\":270607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BULLETIN OF PNRPU. Culture. History. Philosophy. Law\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BULLETIN OF PNRPU. Culture. History. Philosophy. Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15593/perm.kipf/2018.2.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BULLETIN OF PNRPU. Culture. History. Philosophy. Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15593/perm.kipf/2018.2.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

20世纪80年代,技术官僚精英成为我国社会秩序转型的主体。大多数工业管理似乎是现有社会关系改革的支持者。所谓的改革(“加速”)的第一阶段具有技术官僚的特点。20世纪80年代经济改革的直接结果使国内技术官僚的地位大大巩固。20世纪90年代初,产业管理者的压力成为俄罗斯政府最终选择私有化和调整进程的最重要因素。在新权威精英的形成过程中,技术官僚主义也出现在命名文化和“民主主义”之间。在20世纪90年代中期,国内的技术官僚政治在某种意义上又回到了原点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FORMATION AND TRANSFORMATION OF THE SOVIET TECHNOCRATIC ELITE
In the 1980-s technocratic elite became the main subject of the social order transformation in our country. Most industrial man- agement appeared to be the supporters of the existed social relations’ reforms. The first stage of the so called perestroika (“acceleration”) had the technocratic character. Immediate results of economic reforms of the 1980-s allowed domestic technocrats considerably making their positions strong. The pressure of industrial managers became the most important factor in the fina choice of privatization and ad-justment of the Russian government course at the beginning of the 1990-s. Technocratic bureaucracy also came in between nomencla- ture and “democrats” in the process of new authoritative elites’ formation. In the middle of the 1990-s domestic technocracy definitely cycled came back to the original point in a sense.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信