环境影响评估(EIA)程序作为保护环境免受建设/发展危害的工具的有效性的批判性审查

H. Nadir, Ash Ahmed
{"title":"环境影响评估(EIA)程序作为保护环境免受建设/发展危害的工具的有效性的批判性审查","authors":"H. Nadir, Ash Ahmed","doi":"10.47363/jcert/2023(5)143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The developed countries have been doing extraordinary marvels in science, technology and construction with a desire to tame nature coherently. This domination desire has negatively/ irreversibly impacted the environment. However, after generating enormous challenges to nature through uncontrolled developments, the developed countries started endeavouring to save the environment from the devastating impacts of construction projects at the end of the 20th century by incorporating the environmental impact assessment (EIA). EIA is the process of identifying, evaluating, and mitigating development projects' damaging environmental and social effects. In the last 25 years, EIA has developed into a mature system and is an effective tool for assessing, minimising and mitigating severe impacts of development projects on the environment. EIA is only an assessment tool to ascertain the damaging effects of projects on the environment and alternative proposals for their mitigation; however, the final decision rests with political authorities who may consider the EIA report or turn it down in the name of better interests of society/country. Unfortunately, EIA has not proved to be a fully effective process as the developed countries are still undertaking unobstructed/ unopposed mega development projects best conforming to their better interests, and developing countries are still far behind in the apprehension of the necessity of EIA. However, with the UN, USA and EU efforts, more than 120 countries have pledged to exercise EIA to assess development projects before their commencement. In this study, an endeavour has been made to review the necessity/ objectives of EIA, its historical evolutionary process, internationally recognised legal obligations, the stages of the EIA process based on the nature of projects, constraints/ pros and cons of the implementation of EIA process and efficacy of EIA as an intended tool to save the environment from the hazards of mega projects duly supported by three case studies of international projects in USA, Sweden and Pakistan.","PeriodicalId":210581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil Engineering Research & Technology","volume":"145 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Critical Review of the Efficacy of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Process as A Tool Intended to Protect the Environment from Construction/ Development's Hazards\",\"authors\":\"H. Nadir, Ash Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.47363/jcert/2023(5)143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The developed countries have been doing extraordinary marvels in science, technology and construction with a desire to tame nature coherently. This domination desire has negatively/ irreversibly impacted the environment. However, after generating enormous challenges to nature through uncontrolled developments, the developed countries started endeavouring to save the environment from the devastating impacts of construction projects at the end of the 20th century by incorporating the environmental impact assessment (EIA). EIA is the process of identifying, evaluating, and mitigating development projects' damaging environmental and social effects. In the last 25 years, EIA has developed into a mature system and is an effective tool for assessing, minimising and mitigating severe impacts of development projects on the environment. EIA is only an assessment tool to ascertain the damaging effects of projects on the environment and alternative proposals for their mitigation; however, the final decision rests with political authorities who may consider the EIA report or turn it down in the name of better interests of society/country. Unfortunately, EIA has not proved to be a fully effective process as the developed countries are still undertaking unobstructed/ unopposed mega development projects best conforming to their better interests, and developing countries are still far behind in the apprehension of the necessity of EIA. However, with the UN, USA and EU efforts, more than 120 countries have pledged to exercise EIA to assess development projects before their commencement. In this study, an endeavour has been made to review the necessity/ objectives of EIA, its historical evolutionary process, internationally recognised legal obligations, the stages of the EIA process based on the nature of projects, constraints/ pros and cons of the implementation of EIA process and efficacy of EIA as an intended tool to save the environment from the hazards of mega projects duly supported by three case studies of international projects in USA, Sweden and Pakistan.\",\"PeriodicalId\":210581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Civil Engineering Research & Technology\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Civil Engineering Research & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47363/jcert/2023(5)143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil Engineering Research & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47363/jcert/2023(5)143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

发达国家一直在科学、技术和建设方面创造着非凡的奇迹,希望能够连贯地驯服自然。这种支配欲望对环境产生了负面/不可逆转的影响。然而,由于不受控制的发展对自然造成了巨大的挑战,发达国家在20世纪末开始努力通过纳入环境影响评价(EIA)来拯救环境免受建设项目的破坏性影响。环境影响评估是识别、评估和减轻开发项目对环境和社会的破坏性影响的过程。在过去25年,环境影响评估已发展成为一套成熟的制度,是评估、减少及减轻发展项目对环境的严重影响的有效工具。环评只是一项评估工具,用以确定工程项目对环境的破坏性影响,以及减轻影响的替代建议;然而,最终决定取决于政治当局,他们可能会考虑环评报告,也可能会以更好的社会/国家利益的名义拒绝它。不幸的是,由于发达国家仍在进行最符合自身利益的大型开发项目,而发展中国家对环境影响评价的必要性认识还远远落后,环境影响评价并不是一个完全有效的过程。然而,在联合国、美国和欧盟的努力下,已有120多个国家承诺在开发项目开始前进行环境影响评估。本研究以美国、瑞典和巴基斯坦的三个国际项目为例,探讨环评的必要性/目标、历史演变过程、国际公认的法律义务、基于项目性质的环评程序的阶段、实施环评程序的限制/利弊,以及环评作为拯救环境免受大型项目危害的工具的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Critical Review of the Efficacy of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Process as A Tool Intended to Protect the Environment from Construction/ Development's Hazards
The developed countries have been doing extraordinary marvels in science, technology and construction with a desire to tame nature coherently. This domination desire has negatively/ irreversibly impacted the environment. However, after generating enormous challenges to nature through uncontrolled developments, the developed countries started endeavouring to save the environment from the devastating impacts of construction projects at the end of the 20th century by incorporating the environmental impact assessment (EIA). EIA is the process of identifying, evaluating, and mitigating development projects' damaging environmental and social effects. In the last 25 years, EIA has developed into a mature system and is an effective tool for assessing, minimising and mitigating severe impacts of development projects on the environment. EIA is only an assessment tool to ascertain the damaging effects of projects on the environment and alternative proposals for their mitigation; however, the final decision rests with political authorities who may consider the EIA report or turn it down in the name of better interests of society/country. Unfortunately, EIA has not proved to be a fully effective process as the developed countries are still undertaking unobstructed/ unopposed mega development projects best conforming to their better interests, and developing countries are still far behind in the apprehension of the necessity of EIA. However, with the UN, USA and EU efforts, more than 120 countries have pledged to exercise EIA to assess development projects before their commencement. In this study, an endeavour has been made to review the necessity/ objectives of EIA, its historical evolutionary process, internationally recognised legal obligations, the stages of the EIA process based on the nature of projects, constraints/ pros and cons of the implementation of EIA process and efficacy of EIA as an intended tool to save the environment from the hazards of mega projects duly supported by three case studies of international projects in USA, Sweden and Pakistan.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信