诗歌是有毒确定性的解毒剂

Matthew S. Kershaw
{"title":"诗歌是有毒确定性的解毒剂","authors":"Matthew S. Kershaw","doi":"10.6017/lv.v9i2.11127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In examining the discursive environment surrounding the Great War (1914-1918), one finds a familiar reduction of reality into flat and mutually exclusive binaries written in what Robert Graves called \"Newspaper Language.\" In this article, I suggest such discursive flattening to be both unproductive and dehumanizing, employing the term \"toxic certainty\" to refer to language used by a given partisan over and against the perceived other, where the rhetorical force of an assertion is taken to be the proof of that assertion. To counter dehumanizing discourse both in and out of the pulpit, I suggest a remedy in an alternate reading of James 1:22, where preachers can aspire to be \"poets of the word,\" rather than just self-deceiving hearers. This idea is developed through an examination of the poetic efforts to humanize the full reality of the Great War undertaken by Wilfred Owen and Siegfried Sassoon.","PeriodicalId":109688,"journal":{"name":"Lumen et Vita","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poetry as Antidote to Toxic Certainty\",\"authors\":\"Matthew S. Kershaw\",\"doi\":\"10.6017/lv.v9i2.11127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In examining the discursive environment surrounding the Great War (1914-1918), one finds a familiar reduction of reality into flat and mutually exclusive binaries written in what Robert Graves called \\\"Newspaper Language.\\\" In this article, I suggest such discursive flattening to be both unproductive and dehumanizing, employing the term \\\"toxic certainty\\\" to refer to language used by a given partisan over and against the perceived other, where the rhetorical force of an assertion is taken to be the proof of that assertion. To counter dehumanizing discourse both in and out of the pulpit, I suggest a remedy in an alternate reading of James 1:22, where preachers can aspire to be \\\"poets of the word,\\\" rather than just self-deceiving hearers. This idea is developed through an examination of the poetic efforts to humanize the full reality of the Great War undertaken by Wilfred Owen and Siegfried Sassoon.\",\"PeriodicalId\":109688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lumen et Vita\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lumen et Vita\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6017/lv.v9i2.11127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lumen et Vita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6017/lv.v9i2.11127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在考察围绕一战(1914-1918)的话语环境时,人们发现一种熟悉的将现实简化为罗伯特·格雷夫斯称之为“报纸语言”的扁平和相互排斥的二元。在这篇文章中,我认为这种话语扁平化是无效的和非人性化的,使用“有毒的确定性”一词来指代特定党派对感知到的他人使用的语言,其中断言的修辞力量被认为是该断言的证据。为了对抗讲坛内外的非人性化话语,我在雅各书1:22的另一种解读中提出了一种补救办法,在那里,传道人可以渴望成为“话语的诗人”,而不仅仅是自欺欺人的听众。这一观点是通过对威尔弗雷德·欧文和齐格弗里德·沙逊为使一战的全部现实人性化所做的诗歌努力的考察而发展起来的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Poetry as Antidote to Toxic Certainty
In examining the discursive environment surrounding the Great War (1914-1918), one finds a familiar reduction of reality into flat and mutually exclusive binaries written in what Robert Graves called "Newspaper Language." In this article, I suggest such discursive flattening to be both unproductive and dehumanizing, employing the term "toxic certainty" to refer to language used by a given partisan over and against the perceived other, where the rhetorical force of an assertion is taken to be the proof of that assertion. To counter dehumanizing discourse both in and out of the pulpit, I suggest a remedy in an alternate reading of James 1:22, where preachers can aspire to be "poets of the word," rather than just self-deceiving hearers. This idea is developed through an examination of the poetic efforts to humanize the full reality of the Great War undertaken by Wilfred Owen and Siegfried Sassoon.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信