{"title":"2014年澳大利亚不当得利案","authors":"K. Barker, H. Tait","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3891934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A digest, summary and commentary upon Australian caselaw developments on the law of Unjust Enrichment and Restitution in the year 2014. Includes analysis of the critical High Court decisions in Australian Financial Services and Leasing Pty v Hills [2014] HCA 14 (recognising for the first time a defence of change of position in Australian law); Stewart v Atco Controls Pty Ltd [2014] HCA 15.(on liquidators' liens) and Lavin v Toppi (on co-surety contribution rights). Also considers Edelman J's influential decision in Lampson v Fortesque Metals Group Ltd (No 3) [2014] WASC 162.","PeriodicalId":129207,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unjust Enrichment in Australia 2014\",\"authors\":\"K. Barker, H. Tait\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3891934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A digest, summary and commentary upon Australian caselaw developments on the law of Unjust Enrichment and Restitution in the year 2014. Includes analysis of the critical High Court decisions in Australian Financial Services and Leasing Pty v Hills [2014] HCA 14 (recognising for the first time a defence of change of position in Australian law); Stewart v Atco Controls Pty Ltd [2014] HCA 15.(on liquidators' liens) and Lavin v Toppi (on co-surety contribution rights). Also considers Edelman J's influential decision in Lampson v Fortesque Metals Group Ltd (No 3) [2014] WASC 162.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3891934\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3891934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要、总结和评论2014年澳大利亚关于不当得利和赔偿法的判例法发展。包括对澳大利亚金融服务和租赁公司诉希尔斯案[2014]HCA 14中的关键高等法院判决的分析(首次承认澳大利亚法律中立场变化的辩护);Stewart诉Atco Controls Pty Ltd [2014] HCA 15。(关于清算人留置权)和Lavin诉Toppi(关于共同担保出资权)。还考虑了Edelman J在Lampson v Fortesque Metals Group Ltd (No . 3) [2014] WASC 162的影响。
A digest, summary and commentary upon Australian caselaw developments on the law of Unjust Enrichment and Restitution in the year 2014. Includes analysis of the critical High Court decisions in Australian Financial Services and Leasing Pty v Hills [2014] HCA 14 (recognising for the first time a defence of change of position in Australian law); Stewart v Atco Controls Pty Ltd [2014] HCA 15.(on liquidators' liens) and Lavin v Toppi (on co-surety contribution rights). Also considers Edelman J's influential decision in Lampson v Fortesque Metals Group Ltd (No 3) [2014] WASC 162.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
