{"title":"《最后一个死难者:沃伦·g·哈丁丑闻遗产的公众记忆》作者:菲利普·g·佩恩(书评)","authors":"Gregory L. Schneider","doi":"10.5860/choice.47-1049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"84 OHIO VALLEY HISTORY into the League of Nations, but on November 25, 1920, she died of a stroke at the age of forty-eight. As a southern woman, Breckinridge shared many of the characteristics of other women leaders of the day, not the least of which was the high price she paid in her personal life to be a social activist. Yet her independent wealth, family support, organizational talent, circle of wealthy friends, membership in a national network of reformers, and ready access to a state newspaper also set her apart from less privileged women and does raise the question of how much success she would have enjoyed in her endeavors without these advantages. For example, in commenting on her leadership methods, Hay suggests that Breckinridge was not a woman without fault. She could be dictatorial in her dealings with others, and at her death several of the organizations she led found they could not function without her, a failure on her part, perhaps, to cultivate the next generation of leaders. Had Hay provided a broader analysis of Breckinridge’s leadership methods and focused less on reconstructing a chronological account of her almost frantic activities over the years, her work would have made a greater contribution to understanding what made a successful progressive reformer. Yet this is a valuable study that should appeal to historians, biographers, and social activists not only for what it reveals about the life of this gifted woman, but also for what it adds to the growing understanding of reform efforts in the South in the early decades of the twentieth century. Breckinridge operated on local and national levels, and her work shows clearly that southerners actively participated in progressive reform, especially as they struggled to create a New South. Janice M. Leone Middle Tennessee State University","PeriodicalId":338407,"journal":{"name":"Ohio Valley History","volume":"171 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dead Last: The Public Memory of Warren G. Harding’s Scandalous Legacy by Phillip G. Payne (review)\",\"authors\":\"Gregory L. Schneider\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.47-1049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"84 OHIO VALLEY HISTORY into the League of Nations, but on November 25, 1920, she died of a stroke at the age of forty-eight. As a southern woman, Breckinridge shared many of the characteristics of other women leaders of the day, not the least of which was the high price she paid in her personal life to be a social activist. Yet her independent wealth, family support, organizational talent, circle of wealthy friends, membership in a national network of reformers, and ready access to a state newspaper also set her apart from less privileged women and does raise the question of how much success she would have enjoyed in her endeavors without these advantages. For example, in commenting on her leadership methods, Hay suggests that Breckinridge was not a woman without fault. She could be dictatorial in her dealings with others, and at her death several of the organizations she led found they could not function without her, a failure on her part, perhaps, to cultivate the next generation of leaders. Had Hay provided a broader analysis of Breckinridge’s leadership methods and focused less on reconstructing a chronological account of her almost frantic activities over the years, her work would have made a greater contribution to understanding what made a successful progressive reformer. Yet this is a valuable study that should appeal to historians, biographers, and social activists not only for what it reveals about the life of this gifted woman, but also for what it adds to the growing understanding of reform efforts in the South in the early decades of the twentieth century. Breckinridge operated on local and national levels, and her work shows clearly that southerners actively participated in progressive reform, especially as they struggled to create a New South. Janice M. Leone Middle Tennessee State University\",\"PeriodicalId\":338407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ohio Valley History\",\"volume\":\"171 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ohio Valley History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.47-1049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ohio Valley History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.47-1049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
但在1920年11月25日,她死于中风,享年48岁。作为一名南方女性,布雷肯里奇拥有当时其他女性领导人的许多特征,其中最重要的是她在个人生活中为成为一名社会活动家付出了高昂的代价。然而,她独立的财富、家庭的支持、组织才能、富有的朋友圈、全国改革家网络的成员资格,以及可以轻易接触到一家国有报纸,这些都使她与地位较低的女性区别开来,并提出了一个问题:如果没有这些优势,她的努力会取得多大的成功?例如,在评论她的领导方法时,海认为布雷肯里奇不是一个没有缺点的女人。她在对待他人时可以独断专行,在她去世时,她领导的几个组织发现,没有她,它们就无法运转,这也许是她培养下一代领导人的失败。如果海对布雷肯里奇的领导方法进行更广泛的分析,而不是把重点放在重建她多年来近乎疯狂的活动上,她的工作可能会对理解是什么造就了一个成功的进步改革者做出更大的贡献。然而,这是一项有价值的研究,应该吸引历史学家、传记作家和社会活动家,不仅因为它揭示了这位才华横溢的女性的生活,还因为它增加了对20世纪初南方改革努力的理解。布雷肯里奇在地方和国家层面开展工作,她的工作清楚地表明南方人积极参与进步改革,特别是在他们努力创建新南方的时候。Janice M. Leone中田纳西州立大学
Dead Last: The Public Memory of Warren G. Harding’s Scandalous Legacy by Phillip G. Payne (review)
84 OHIO VALLEY HISTORY into the League of Nations, but on November 25, 1920, she died of a stroke at the age of forty-eight. As a southern woman, Breckinridge shared many of the characteristics of other women leaders of the day, not the least of which was the high price she paid in her personal life to be a social activist. Yet her independent wealth, family support, organizational talent, circle of wealthy friends, membership in a national network of reformers, and ready access to a state newspaper also set her apart from less privileged women and does raise the question of how much success she would have enjoyed in her endeavors without these advantages. For example, in commenting on her leadership methods, Hay suggests that Breckinridge was not a woman without fault. She could be dictatorial in her dealings with others, and at her death several of the organizations she led found they could not function without her, a failure on her part, perhaps, to cultivate the next generation of leaders. Had Hay provided a broader analysis of Breckinridge’s leadership methods and focused less on reconstructing a chronological account of her almost frantic activities over the years, her work would have made a greater contribution to understanding what made a successful progressive reformer. Yet this is a valuable study that should appeal to historians, biographers, and social activists not only for what it reveals about the life of this gifted woman, but also for what it adds to the growing understanding of reform efforts in the South in the early decades of the twentieth century. Breckinridge operated on local and national levels, and her work shows clearly that southerners actively participated in progressive reform, especially as they struggled to create a New South. Janice M. Leone Middle Tennessee State University