新闻传播中的用户偏好算法推荐机制分析

Shang Cao
{"title":"新闻传播中的用户偏好算法推荐机制分析","authors":"Shang Cao","doi":"10.32996/jcsts.2023.5.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the continuous improvement of algorithm technology, the field of news communication has also ushered in a transformation from traditional media to self-media, from self-media to algorithmic media, and from the center of the transmitter to the center of the recipient. The news algorithm recommendation mechanism can effectively meet the preferences and needs of users, maximize the cohesion between media and users, and ensure that the number of customers will not be lost in business operations. However, the news algorithm recommendation mechanism also has many problems of its own. This article analyzes it from the following multiple angles. First of all, starting from the theory of agenda setting in the field of news communication, it can be concluded that agenda setting under the news algorithm recommendation mechanism is partially invalid, but the mainstream media can still take on the role of replacement. Secondly, it analyzes the two aspects of information rights and privacy rights from the perspective of law and interprets the legal effect of news algorithm recommendation from two different normative paths. Finally, through sociological discussion of technology ethics, it is necessary to establish a more unified social norm to deal with various ethical crises that technology may bring.","PeriodicalId":417206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of User Preference Algorithm Recommendation Mechanism in News Communication\",\"authors\":\"Shang Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.32996/jcsts.2023.5.1.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the continuous improvement of algorithm technology, the field of news communication has also ushered in a transformation from traditional media to self-media, from self-media to algorithmic media, and from the center of the transmitter to the center of the recipient. The news algorithm recommendation mechanism can effectively meet the preferences and needs of users, maximize the cohesion between media and users, and ensure that the number of customers will not be lost in business operations. However, the news algorithm recommendation mechanism also has many problems of its own. This article analyzes it from the following multiple angles. First of all, starting from the theory of agenda setting in the field of news communication, it can be concluded that agenda setting under the news algorithm recommendation mechanism is partially invalid, but the mainstream media can still take on the role of replacement. Secondly, it analyzes the two aspects of information rights and privacy rights from the perspective of law and interprets the legal effect of news algorithm recommendation from two different normative paths. Finally, through sociological discussion of technology ethics, it is necessary to establish a more unified social norm to deal with various ethical crises that technology may bring.\",\"PeriodicalId\":417206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2023.5.1.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2023.5.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着算法技术的不断完善,新闻传播领域也迎来了从传统媒体到自媒体、从自媒体到算法媒体、从传播者为中心到接受者为中心的转变。新闻算法推荐机制可以有效满足用户的偏好和需求,最大限度地实现媒体与用户之间的凝聚力,保证在商业运营中不流失客户数量。但是,新闻算法推荐机制本身也存在很多问题。本文从以下几个角度对其进行分析。首先,从新闻传播领域的议程设置理论出发,可以得出新闻算法推荐机制下的议程设置部分无效,但主流媒体仍然可以承担替代作用。其次,从法律角度对信息权和隐私权两个方面进行分析,从两条不同的规范路径解读新闻算法推荐的法律效果。最后,通过对技术伦理的社会学探讨,需要建立更加统一的社会规范来应对技术可能带来的各种伦理危机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of User Preference Algorithm Recommendation Mechanism in News Communication
With the continuous improvement of algorithm technology, the field of news communication has also ushered in a transformation from traditional media to self-media, from self-media to algorithmic media, and from the center of the transmitter to the center of the recipient. The news algorithm recommendation mechanism can effectively meet the preferences and needs of users, maximize the cohesion between media and users, and ensure that the number of customers will not be lost in business operations. However, the news algorithm recommendation mechanism also has many problems of its own. This article analyzes it from the following multiple angles. First of all, starting from the theory of agenda setting in the field of news communication, it can be concluded that agenda setting under the news algorithm recommendation mechanism is partially invalid, but the mainstream media can still take on the role of replacement. Secondly, it analyzes the two aspects of information rights and privacy rights from the perspective of law and interprets the legal effect of news algorithm recommendation from two different normative paths. Finally, through sociological discussion of technology ethics, it is necessary to establish a more unified social norm to deal with various ethical crises that technology may bring.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信