开发人员需要需求,但他们的项目经理不需要;以及可能超越的霍桑效应

Daniel Isaacs, D. Berry
{"title":"开发人员需要需求,但他们的项目经理不需要;以及可能超越的霍桑效应","authors":"Daniel Isaacs, D. Berry","doi":"10.1109/EmpiRE.2011.6046254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports the results of a case study conducted in July 2010 of one industrial software development project to determine how the project's lack of any explicit requirements gathering process affected the project's development and the product that it produced. The study reveals that the lack of any requirements gathering process apparently led to missing functions in the product, reduced productivity among the project's members, and poor cost estimation. This lack converted a potentially profitable project into a liability. In the end, the project members completed the product, but much time was wasted. A requirements specification could have saved this time. Conducting the case study appears to have resulted in an increased awareness among the study's subjects, i.e., the project's manager and members, that a requirements engineering process was needed. This awareness apparently led to a Hawthorne effect, in which the project manager and members improved their requirements process. The next project conducted by the project manager was begun with an explicit requirements gathering process. This improved process continued through at least the end of July 2011, 12 months after completion of the study.","PeriodicalId":128168,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE 2011)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developers want requirements, but their project manager doesn't; and a possibly transcendent Hawthorne effect\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Isaacs, D. Berry\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EmpiRE.2011.6046254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper reports the results of a case study conducted in July 2010 of one industrial software development project to determine how the project's lack of any explicit requirements gathering process affected the project's development and the product that it produced. The study reveals that the lack of any requirements gathering process apparently led to missing functions in the product, reduced productivity among the project's members, and poor cost estimation. This lack converted a potentially profitable project into a liability. In the end, the project members completed the product, but much time was wasted. A requirements specification could have saved this time. Conducting the case study appears to have resulted in an increased awareness among the study's subjects, i.e., the project's manager and members, that a requirements engineering process was needed. This awareness apparently led to a Hawthorne effect, in which the project manager and members improved their requirements process. The next project conducted by the project manager was begun with an explicit requirements gathering process. This improved process continued through at least the end of July 2011, 12 months after completion of the study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":128168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE 2011)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE 2011)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EmpiRE.2011.6046254\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE 2011)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EmpiRE.2011.6046254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文报告了2010年7月对一个工业软件开发项目进行的案例研究的结果,以确定项目缺乏任何明确的需求收集过程如何影响项目的开发及其产生的产品。研究表明,缺乏任何需求收集过程显然会导致产品中功能的缺失,降低项目成员的生产力,以及糟糕的成本估算。这种缺乏将一个潜在盈利的项目变成了负债。最后,项目成员完成了产品,但是浪费了很多时间。需求规范本可以节省这段时间。进行案例研究似乎导致了研究对象(即项目经理和成员)对需求工程过程的认识的提高。这种意识显然导致了霍桑效应,项目经理和成员改进了他们的需求过程。由项目经理执行的下一个项目以明确的需求收集过程开始。这一改善过程至少持续到2011年7月底,即研究完成12个月后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developers want requirements, but their project manager doesn't; and a possibly transcendent Hawthorne effect
This paper reports the results of a case study conducted in July 2010 of one industrial software development project to determine how the project's lack of any explicit requirements gathering process affected the project's development and the product that it produced. The study reveals that the lack of any requirements gathering process apparently led to missing functions in the product, reduced productivity among the project's members, and poor cost estimation. This lack converted a potentially profitable project into a liability. In the end, the project members completed the product, but much time was wasted. A requirements specification could have saved this time. Conducting the case study appears to have resulted in an increased awareness among the study's subjects, i.e., the project's manager and members, that a requirements engineering process was needed. This awareness apparently led to a Hawthorne effect, in which the project manager and members improved their requirements process. The next project conducted by the project manager was begun with an explicit requirements gathering process. This improved process continued through at least the end of July 2011, 12 months after completion of the study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信